Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 82

Thread: The strength of the IRA 1963-1969

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member diy01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    3,013
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default The strength of the IRA 1963-1969

    It's been awhile since I read J. Bowyer Bell's book 'The Secret Army: The IRA 1916-1979' which covers the period in question.

    What sort of state was the IRA in when violence erupted in the North in August 1969? Was it mostly filled with diehard veterans from the 30s, 40s and 50s like Joe Cahill, Seán Keenan, Ruairí Ó Brádaigh and John Joe McGirl etc? Had its numbers increased as a result of the clashes in 1968 and January of 69 (Burntollet)?

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that the IRA had a total of about 50 active volunteers in all of Belfast in '69. Could comparisons be drawn between the Continuity IRA of today and the Irish Republican Army in 1968 or 69? Speaking strictly in terms of numerical strength and influence (or irrelevance) here...

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    IRA numerical strength increased substantially throughout the '60s according to various sources. Richard English puts the number of volunteers in 1966 at 1,000 compared to some 600 in 1962. Substantial growth was apparently achieved in Belfast.

    By 1972, according to Ed Maloney volunteer numbers had risen to between 1,500 and 2,000. This was probably the high point. After that numbers dramatically decreased or were deliberately decreased. Maloney wrote in 1980 that:

    "A joint RUC/British Army assessment last winter put the IRA's strength throughout the North of Ireland at around the 300 mark with perhaps as many as 3,000 active sympathisers providing safe houses , transport etc ."
    Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I wonder how the Official/Provo split would have affected the IRA at the
    end of this period?

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    expect much to be answered in this new book, is meant to cover OIRA from 56 onwards

    The Lost Revolution: The Story of the Official IRA and the Workers' Party (Paperback)
    by Brian Hanley (Author), Scott Millar (Author)

    Is up on amazon now but not out to autumn

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Joe Cahill was not in the IRA for most of this period.

    The IRA at the time was growing, but it was also changing, taking on a more political focus, though training with weapons etc did continue. People were being directed primarily towards joining Sinn Féin and getting involved in social and economic agitations, such as the Housing Action Committees, the fish-ins etc. We can overestimate the growth though. An internal report a few years before 1969 said that in many places the movement didn't exist.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Inchicore
    Posts
    671
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    The IRA at that time were few in number, had very few guns and had mostly given up the idea of armed actions. In 1969 when Nationalists areas were under attack from Loyalists groups like the UVF, RUC and B Specials Nationalists spat at the IRA and painted IRA I Ran Away on walls because they had no protection.
    SMASH THE NAMA REPUBLIC GET OUT AND PROTEST

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    10,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diy01 View Post
    It's been awhile since I read J. Bowyer Bell's book 'The Secret Army: The IRA 1916-1979' which covers the period in question.

    What sort of state was the IRA in when violence erupted in the North in August 1969? Was it mostly filled with diehard veterans from the 30s, 40s and 50s like Joe Cahill, Seán Keenan, Ruairí Ó Brádaigh and John Joe McGirl etc? Had its numbers increased as a result of the clashes in 1968 and January of 69 (Burntollet)?

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that the IRA had a total of about 50 active volunteers in all of Belfast in '69. Could comparisons be drawn between the Continuity IRA of today and the Irish Republican Army in 1968 or 69? Speaking strictly in terms of numerical strength and influence (or irrelevance) here...
    Ruairí Ó Brádaigh and John Joe McGirl were in the Midlands not the North.

    The IRA had a few hundred members in the 60s but never did much.

    I think it was a lack of weapons rather than potential numbers that hindered them + as now (2009) a template upon which to base a campaign with any realistic base of popular support.

    But things changed then & they might well do again...

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Numbers isn't the issue, nor weapons. You will always get them if the time is right. The questions are aims, allies, strategy, tactics and ideology.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    10,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cactusflower View Post
    Numbers isn't the issue, nor weapons. You will always get them if the time is right. The questions are aims, allies, strategy, tactics and ideology.
    Their ideology under Goulding went a bit wonky too!

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member b.a. baracus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Breaking out of a high security stockade
    Posts
    2,222
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cactusflower View Post
    Numbers isn't the issue, nor weapons. You will always get them if the time is right. The questions are aims, allies, strategy, tactics and ideology.
    Absolutely. It was not a question of a lack of arms or personnel. Following the border campaign and through the 1960's the IRA moved far to the left and adopted a whole new philosophy under a heavily Dublin based leadership. This change meant their chosen method of advancing their objectives moved further away from armed struggle. Hence the later split.
    Last edited by b.a. baracus; 19th August 2009 at 08:26 PM.
    I ain't gettin' on no plane

Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •