Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Getting deeper into NAMA Wonderland

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member Dreaded_Estate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Getting deeper into NAMA Wonderland

    True Economics: Economics 24/07/2009: getting deeper into NAMA Wonderland

    Another very good piece from Constantin Gurdgiev

    NAMA is a quagmire that is only getting bigger the longer we are looking at it. The latest reports now claim that the NAMA remit will be extended to cover foreign banks operating here, suggesting that cross-collateralised loans and holdings will be facing embarrassingly lengthy legal challenges otherwise. Of course, it was never the original Government intent to share the spoils of a taxpayer-paid bailout to prop up foreign banks. But hey, if sharing the trough is what it takes to rob the taxpayers, then our Government has no problem with this.

    A revealing research note from Davy published today says it all: "From an equity investor’s point of view, an examinership process for a big developer such as Carroll would be preferable to
    receivership/liquidation. The banks concerned would still have to take a write-down, but it offers the developer the prospect of survival and provides the banks with an opportunity to get back the remainder of their money. Having said that, it would obviously be preferable if these
    actions stopped altogether, allowing NAMA to proceed unobstructed.[Read: the spoils will be richer if the lawyers stayed away from the feeding corale.] It is important to understand that examinerships are likely to occur only where developers are forced into a corner such as we have seen recently with ACC. Voluntary examinership is unlikely given that any successful restructuring of debt does not cancel a developer's personal guarantee to the lender (which many of them have)."

    Now, examinerships are also possible, of course, if the developers are insolvent and have cash flow problems. But Davy would not mention that small tid-bit because they are fully aware that majority of the troubled developers are, in collusion with the banks, restructured. Anticipation of NAMA has also made many of them, undoubtedly, transfer all liquid assets to the shelters where no NAMA can touch them. So all of this implies two things:

    1. The idea that NAMA will pursue vigorously non-performing developers is bonkers - there will be nothing to pursue comes 18 months since NAMA or the banks rescue (depending on how smart a given developer was) was first rumored. By the time NAMA is operative, there will be nothing left that is held in the name of each one of these developers that has any chance of ever being liquified.
    2. The question as to whether this amazing delay in rolling out NAMA was knowingly applied by the Government to allow an escape clause for some loans holders. This is, of course, a speculation, but as any student of undergraduate economics knows, if you want to prevent people from taking preventative actions, any policy change should be unaticipated. Of course, as always, there is an alternative, but equally unpleasant, explanation as to why the Government chose to announce well in advance its desire to set up NAMA - the explanation of a panic response to a perceived crisis.

    So do tell me now, how can Minister Lenihan claim that, based on the information he has seen,
    it was "not inevitable" that NAMA would result in the state taking majority ownership of AIB and BofI. How? Well, this can be possible if and only if either

    1. the haircuts applied to the NAMA purchases are deep enough to compensate for the cost of bonds, plus the impairment rate on loans transferred. Do the math - at 5% over 15 years coupon, applied to a purchase yielding 3% in revenue - 26% (not factoring in any inflation), the latter is anyone's guess, but judging by NIB, ACC, Nationwide etc examples, should be around 20-30%. Do the math, or
    2. post-NAMA recapitalization of the banks will be done as a give-away of taxpayers money, while the banks post-default 'liability' on assets that Mr Lenihan was so keen to promote as a 'safeguard' for the taxpayers only few months ago will be nill.

    Again, take you pick, but either the Government is aiming to be reckless with our money or deceitful.

    Oh, and another thing - the new talk about NAMA liabilities being off the state balance sheet. This is kind of what Messrs Leniham and Cowman assumed will happen with the banks guarantees, until the international observers and analysts got a wind of it. Ditto with NAMA. Last week's decision by Eurostat, titled The statistical recording of public interventions to support financial institutions and financial markets during the financial crisis does allow for the possibility for Minister Leniham to hide NAMA liabilities off the front ledger of his Government. In particular, Eurostat's Section 8: Classification of certain new bodies allows the state to separately account for a funded entity "where ...the identification of an institutional unit in the national accounts requires that the body has "autonomy of decision" in respect of its principle function and either keeps a complete set of accounts or it would be possible and meaningful, from both an economic and legal viewpoint to compile a set of accounts if they were required". Now, if Cowen/Lenihan due can convince the readily convinceable EU Commission that NAMA undertaking has nothing to do with the General Government and has its own life and management. Never mind that the same taxpayers paying for Messr Lenihan and Cowen wages and their spending plans under the General Government expenditure will be underwriting NAMA. The charade of 'low debt Ireland' will then go on unperturbed.

    In other words, if Lenihan is successful, some €60bn of bonds might be called something other than the official Irish Government debt. This is pure farce, but hey, may be as the taxpayers we can go on strike and tell Mr Lenihan to pay for NAMA out of its own pocket - afterall, it will be fully autonomous from the Government and therefore from us, the taxpayers?

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote from halfway thru the post: This is kind of what Messrs Leniham and Cowman assumed will happen with the banks guarantees
    Sly reference to the farmer's protests or just a Freudian slip?

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Another take (courtesy of the guys on Property Pin) on what's really going on.


    Politics.ie: The Real NAMA scam? Follow the money...
    “A healthy social life is found only, when in the mirror of each soul the whole community finds its reflection, and when in the whole community the virtue of each one is living” R. Steiner

  4. #4

    Default

    Apart from facetious spelling quibbles it remains that Constanin Gurdgiev
    and Brian Lucey have been the most effective critics of the FF response to the banking crises. As far as I recall Lucey was guesstimating the cost of the bank rescues at 25 billion back in September last year; well before any other commentator was prepared to stick the neck out and give a figure.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member spidermom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Unhappy

    Possible very politically niave post coming...you have been warned...does anyone else think the delay in Nama legislation..and the "now we are going to publish it online...so everyone can discuss it"...is this really the gov hoping that the Sh!t hits the fan and they will not be the ones left with the history of this for a generation!!!...are they cowards....cunning ...or just stupid.....?


    The more I learn of this the more concerned I get...this one pile of bad stuff coming down the line(economy speak....don't ya know!!!)
    When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity.

    ALBERT EINSTEIN

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member cyberianpan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wherever I can see
    Posts
    16,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spidermom View Post
    Possible very politically niave post coming...you have been warned...does anyone else think the delay in Nama legislation..and the "now we are going to publish it online...so everyone can discuss it"...is this really the gov hoping that the Sh!t hits the fan and they will not be the ones left with the history of this for a generation!!!...are they cowards....cunning ...or just stupid.....?


    The more I learn of this the more concerned I get...this one pile of bad stuff coming down the line(economy speak....don't ya know!!!)
    Delay?
    I'm not sure there's much of a one... they said end July ... and it will make end July

    Online for open debate:
    Hmmmmmmm, FG & Lab will rubbish it anyway ... I suspect the aim is to pick up a few economists ... when folks see the deal with pricing (especially the way they plan to put the risk back on the banks) they'll realise it is nationalisation ... wonder will they hold their tongues ?

    cYp
    "Yawn , am I alive yet ?"

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think Spidermom it boils down to this... a beautiful line I heard from a commnetator today, in reference to the rising anger amongst the populace to the Mc Carthy report.. but which will very soon become the response to everything else which arises.. including NAMA...

    He said.. if the cuts proposed in the Mc Carthy report are implemented, the country will go down in flames.. but.. if the cuts proposed in the Mc Carthy report are not implemented.. the country will go down in flames...

    a bit like Bart Simpsons saying.. you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't....

    Permanent TSB's actions showed today, in full view of the populace, that banks do, what banks do.. make money, no matter who gets caught under the wheels... they have to do so.. by law.. its an imperative to act with fiduciary responsibility... so, they hiked rates

    AIB and BOI will follow suit shortly... when this happens, people will finally.. suddenly... wake up to what NAMA will really mean... and then... well, the lads at work are laughing at me when I say it.. but I'm more and more convinced as every day goes by... well then, it's time to stock up on tinned food and bullets

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spidermom View Post
    Possible very politically niave post coming...you have been warned...does anyone else think the delay in Nama legislation..and the "now we are going to publish it online...so everyone can discuss it"...is this really the gov hoping that the Sh!t hits the fan and they will not be the ones left with the history of this for a generation!!!...are they cowards....cunning ...or just stupid.....?


    The more I learn of this the more concerned I get...this one pile of bad stuff coming down the line(economy speak....don't ya know!!!)
    I don't think they have taken a deliberate decision to delay it. It was crisis mode and firefighting since the guarantee last September. After that it was very much a case of 'where do we go from here?" Remember that they didn't originally want to nationalise Anglo but were forced to in the end as the scale of the disaster became apparent. Also you had a huge collapse in AIB and BOI share prices at the end of January this year. Its obvious in retropect that Lenihan and co. were always that bit behind the ball instead of actualy directing events. Its complex stuff and until they they got some kind of handle on what was going on in other countries they weren't going to push on too fast. Looking back at the the first quarter of the year you had the crisis of interest rates on gov. borrowing as well.
    I'd criticise Lenny and co. for pretty much everything but I can't see how they could have moved any faster on NAMA legislation.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member spidermom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyberianpan View Post
    Delay?
    I'm not sure there's much of a one... they said end July ... and it will make end July

    Online for open debate:
    Hmmmmmmm, FG & Lab will rubbish it anyway ... I suspect the aim is to pick up a few economists ... when folks see the deal with pricing (especially the way they plan to put the risk back on the banks) they'll realise it is nationalisation ... wonder will they hold their tongues ?

    cYp


    Said I was niave...but the banking sh1te hit when......12 (almost) full months ago...what do we have...the guarantees....thats it!!..if they knew that the Nama legislation would be ready 10 days after the Dail finished...well sure hang on boyos...and we'll get it done and let them started...they have a majority afterall...they could have pushed it through..let the Nama merchants get on with it over the silly season..and job done...but no..the delay...the debate...the controversy continues....during quiet time...very un-Irish-parliamentary conduct????
    When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity.

    ALBERT EINSTEIN

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Royalty toxic avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    19,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    We're about to fail as an independent entity, aren't we? The next decade is going to be the late 1950s multiplied...

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •