Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 72

Thread: Hollywoods latest take on the Easter Rising: Easter Sixteen

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Hollywoods latest take on the Easter Rising: Easter Sixteen

    One of Ireland's foremost historians has warned that a Hollywood take on the 1916 Easter Rising might be exploited by dissident republicans in their campaign against the peace process.

    Easter Sixteen stars Guy Pearce as James Connolly, the Irish Marxist who took part in the rising and was executed at Dublin's Kilmainham jail, and Ian Hart as Thomas Clarke, another key figure in the uprising.

    Paul Bew, a professor of Irish politics and a leading historian, has expressed concern that unless the complexities of the Rising are explained, the simple message that a dedicated minority can use violence will encourage present-day dissidents...

    [Nicola Charles, producer of Easter Sixteen:] "The film is really the prequel to Michael Collins. Our final scene is their opening scene. It's a human interest story and in no way does it glorify violence. It's not about violence and revolution, it's about hope and heroism."

    Charles said the characters in the film such as Connolly "are not essentially rebels, they are ordinary people who didn't want to fight for the King or the Kaiser". She admitted that "European factual purists will rip this film apart completely. We have actors from all over the world. It's a dramatisation. A story about the fight for freedom."
    Baron Bew of Donegore introduces various talking points arguing against a sensationalist or romanticized depiction of historical events. He seems unfamiliar with how Hollywood movies generate money. Something that jumped out was "She also revealed that there were six other scripts floating around Hollywood about the rebellion"- hard to know if this number is unusual.

    New film about Easter Rising 'may give IRA dissidents ammunition' | UK news | The Observer

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pete2 View Post
    Baron Bew of Donegore introduces various talking points arguing against a sensationalist or romanticized depiction of historical events. He seems unfamiliar with how Hollywood movies generate money. Something that jumped out was "She also revealed that there were six other scripts floating around Hollywood about the rebellion"- hard to know if this number is unusual.

    New film about Easter Rising 'may give IRA dissidents ammunition' | UK news | The Observer
    A historian calling for history to be censored and buried. Disgraceful.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I want to see James Nesbitt as Carson and Keeley Hawes as
    Lady Lavery.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    10,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Its always the few who get things done.

    As for:

    "The story of the Rising is the decision by an unelected group of politically motivated to destroy the democratic, leadership of Irish nationalism."

    Like come off it Mr Bew

    - the British Establishment had never recognised our Democratic Rights to determine our own Destiny as a Nation.

    The Leaders of Ireland's 1916 Rising had every right to strike for her freedom.

    If Britain had recognised Ireland's wish to determine her own Destiny then the Rising of 1916 would not have taken place.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Crowley View Post
    A historian calling for history to be censored and buried. Disgraceful.
    I think its the other way around, hes b1tching because he thinks it will not be as multilayered and faceted as it should be.

    He is right of course, but nobody wants to pay to sit through a 5 hour boreathon, they want simple heroics, good versus evil, boy gets girl narrative. They want entertainment. To be honest I wouldn't mind an indepth visual history to be done, where Baron Bew of Donegore was involved, but his political prejudices would need to be declared beforehand.

  6. #6

    Default

    there been surprisingly few films on this issue
    If I ask a question don't just 'like' the post, reply to it. - If I post a lot about a subject I may write a post about it at http://dublinstreams.blogspot.ie/

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catalpa View Post

    If Britain had recognised Ireland's wish to determine her own Destiny then the Rising of 1916 would not have taken place.

    The rising would not have happened but for the undemocratic rebellion by Unionists in ulster.

    This caused a reaction by nationalists forming the Irish volunteers, a section of whom went on to carry out the rising.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    10,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Breadan O'Connor View Post
    The rising would not have happened but for the undemocratic rebellion by Unionists in ulster.

    This caused a reaction by nationalists forming the Irish volunteers, a section of whom went on to carry out the rising.
    Indeed that was the spark that led to 1916 all right.

    How come Mr Bew does not describe the UVF as Undemocratic?

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catalpa View Post
    Indeed that was the spark that led to 1916 all right.

    How come Mr Bew does not describe the UVF as Undemocratic?

    I've noticed revisinists tend to discuss 1916 as if it happened out of nowhere.

    They never put in the context of the powerful and successful rebellion by the Ulster unionists, led by Craig and Carson, which must have hugely dented the credibility of constitutional Nationalism.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I wish they wouldn't even attempt to make a film about this. Nobody in Hollywood has got either the balls or the independence to do it justice. The makers of this film will be poring over it trying to make sure they cut and chop so as not to 'offend' the British (who still think they hold the deeds over how Irish history should be interpreted (and who use people like Bew and Foster to assert their narrative)). In addition there are too many films dealing with the Troubles and the early Twentieth Century conflicts in Ireland.

    What i would like to see are more films made telling the story of how the colonial assault on Ireland originated in the first place (instead of cutting forward to the early twentieth century or the Troubles) but from an independent (ie de-Hollywoodised) perspective, do the Nine Years War, the Norman Invasion or more importantly - do the wars of the 17thC and 1798... Hell there hasn't even been a film made about the so-called famine - an event that had enormous influence on the history of America itself (never mind Ireland), they won't do it because they won't risk annoying the British... but given the interest in Irish history among Non-Irish (and there is a lot) it would be good to give them some background... It could (in the right hands) be powerful and entertaining as well.

Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •