Yes, agree she obviously was/is vulnerable/susceptible/possibly incapable of either giving or withdrawing consent. Until she met up with her family, later on.
Walking home alone, after a night out (with drink?) at night at 2am in the morning and linking up with a 27 yr old (who was renowned as a drunk) - did she know him?
Did he physically 'drag' her up to the muddy patch?
If so, why didn't the Jury convict him as a rapist?
And, why are you deliberately being misleading/untruthful in implying this man had previous convictions for sexual matters? in the article i read, the man's 'previous convictions' were for drunken behaviour - not sexual assault.