Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 83

Thread: The Reason JFK Jr was Murdered

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member Destiny's Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Milan & Cork
    Posts
    2,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default The Reason JFK Jr was Murdered

    Two documentary films can be seen on the web on Google Video

    1. JFKII

    2. The Assassination of JFK Jr


    These are very important documentaries and are produced by a guy called John Hankey.

    His website is www.jfkii.com

    John Hankey sent an e mail out to all on his contact database recently and it was posted on the net at: http://www.rense.com/general78/reas.htm

    Its a series of e mails between himself and another guy who makes claims on why JFK Jr was taken out. The evidence sent to John Hankey may be a fabrication but you may judge for yourselves.

    John Hankey is a hero for the great work he has done in exposing the complete disinformation on the death of JFK Jr.

    Many on this site are openly hostile to me posting this type of topic. But one thing you can't deny: assassinations have always been part of the political landscape. It is my belief they haven't gone away and are still part of it today. You've just got to have the acute senses to pick it up. Or as others call it, paranoia.



    JFK Jr would have been running for election about now or perhaps back in 2004.

    He would have ruined a lot of plans for Bush, the military machine and perhaps a certain lady in waiting.

    Im not saying Bill had anything to do with it, but it happened on his watch and the coverup came from the Pentagon. JFK Jr had published an uncomplimentary article on Bill's past in his publication GEORGE . Like his publication on The Mossad's involvement in the assassination of Yitzak Rabine, JFK Jr was perhaps too dangerous for the establishment to tolerate.
    Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
    Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But Conscience asks the question - is it right?
    And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular;but one must take it simply because it is right. -MLK

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member Destiny's Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Milan & Cork
    Posts
    2,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    There is even something else about JFK Jr. which is worth noting.

    In one of the first issues of George magazine, published in 1996, there appeared an article entitled, "The Quigley Cult," written by Scott McLemee. The headline read, "What do President Bill Clinton and the militias have in common? They both revere the weird theories of the late Carroll Quigley."

    Quigley was a highly regarded professor of history who taught a course in Western Civilization at Georgetown University which Bill Clinton took in the school year of 1964-65, a year after the assassination of President Kennedy. That was about the same time that Quigley had finished writing his massive tome on contemporary history, "Tragedy and Hope," which was published by Macmillan in 1966.

    We probably would not be talking about that 1,300-page book today if it weren't for one paragraph that appears on page 950. Quigley wrote:

    There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

    What Quigley was alluding to was the secret plan, concocted by Cecil Rhodes, to achieve world peace by creating a world government, controlled by the Anglo-Saxons, powerful enough to impose its political will on the rest of mankind. This was to be achieved by creating a secret society on the order of the Society of Jesus that would gain control of the wealth of the world, gain control of the British and American governments, and recruit its future leaders through the Rhodes Scholarships. Rhodes figured that the plan would take about 200 years to achieve its ultimate goal.
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=16178


    Is this the One World Government conspiracists are talking about?

    The one which Bush Sr in 1990 talked about "A New World Order"

    And repeated by Gordon Brown recently which can bee seen here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0

    Bill Clinton was on Tubridy this morning talking about his new book Giving. Bill was excited by his new role as world peacemaker. Was Bill an anointed candidate a long time before he ran for the Presidency?
    Who knows. At least the man has a brain of his own.

    PS
    His book Giving does have a somewhat lurid connotation in the context of a sexual act performed by Monica. No doubt the pun is there for a purpose.
    Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
    Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But Conscience asks the question - is it right?
    And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular;but one must take it simply because it is right. -MLK

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member soubresauts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,967
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    It's funny how pejorative the term "conspiracy theorist" is. Anyone who suggests that Oswald didn't act alone in the JFK assassination is labeled a "conspiracy theorist" and is dismissed in a hostile way by many people. However, if you go on the evidence, you must conclude that it's likely that Oswald didn't act alone; in other words, you're putting forward a theory that there was a conspiracy. We don't know for sure, but we can see that certain things are more likely than other things.

    So, I'm asserting that it's likely that there was a conspiracy behind the JFK assassination. There's a fair bit of evidence that there was a conspiracy behind the Robert Kennedy assassination too, and that some of the same people were involved (as in the JFK killing).

    I know almost nothing about the death of John Kennedy Junior. Is there any solid evidence of a conspiracy? It does seem likely that all sorts of people wanted him dead.
    15 Jan 2001 -- Fine Gael pledged to end fluoridation because of "serious health concerns".

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Lee Harvey Oswald. Where are you when your country needs you?
    "If the Germans land in Ireland they will be welcomed as liberators".

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    34,384
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    The House Select Committee on Assassinations found that Oswald didn't work along and that he couldn't have fired the third of the four shots fired at the Presidents car.

    The Warren Report found that Oswald had worked alone and also that only three shots were fired.

    So there are two official reports on what happened.
    Happiness is a dry martini and a good woman … or a bad woman.
    –George Burns

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member Destiny's Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Milan & Cork
    Posts
    2,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Soubresauts,

    Just watch the Video on google Video.

    You'll be shocked by what you see.

    JFKii and The Assassination of JFK Jr do go hand in hand.

    As for RFK, well the Coroner who did the autopsy said the gunpowder residue at THE BACK of RFKs head, meant the shot had to have been fired within a few inches of RFKs head.

    Sirhan Sirhan the supposed assassin, didnt know why he would have wanted to kill RFK and was standing IN FRONT of RFK when he raised his gun. RFKs assassination was like a magicians sleight of hand ie watch the guy holding the gun at the front as a bullet is put through the back of RFKs brain.

    JFK Jrs death was sold as Jr being a wreckless pilot spoilt rich kid who deserved to die. Its was a pity though he had to kill his nice wife and sister in law etc etc.

    You may download these JFK videos for free at:

    http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
    Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
    Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But Conscience asks the question - is it right?
    And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular;but one must take it simply because it is right. -MLK

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    For Christ's sake, if you want to write threads about conspiracy theories, go to a conspiracy theory website. This is not a conspiracy theory website. It is a politics website. At this stage your nutty threads are just making a laughing stock of this site. Sooner or later the mods will begin to get as tough on this cr*p as they have done on other stuff and ban it from the site.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Insider2007
    For Christ's sake, if you want to write threads about conspiracy theories, go to a conspiracy theory website. This is not a conspiracy theory website. It is a politics website. At this stage your nutty threads are just making a laughing stock of this site. Sooner or later the mods will begin to get as tough on this cr*p as they have done on other stuff and ban it from the site.
    Did you consider it ?
    Redacted.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Insider2007
    For Christ's sake, if you want to write threads about conspiracy theories, go to a conspiracy theory website. This is not a conspiracy theory website. It is a politics website. At this stage your nutty threads are just making a laughing stock of this site. Sooner or later the mods will begin to get as tough on this cr*p as they have done on other stuff and ban it from the site.
    Bravo old boy.
    We wouldn't want people to question the status que, now would we?.
    The square root of the golden ratio times pi is close to 4, this product is 3.996168.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    above you
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Insider2007
    For Christ's sake, if you want to write threads about conspiracy theories, go to a conspiracy theory website. This is not a conspiracy theory website. It is a politics website. At this stage your nutty threads are just making a laughing stock of this site. Sooner or later the mods will begin to get as tough on this cr*p as they have done on other stuff and ban it from the site.
    Speak for yourself, I find these threads valuable and I've been contributing to this forum for longer than you.

    Who appointed you the moderator of what is and isn't allowed here?

    You're not really the liberal progressive you like to think, are you, Insider?
    We can turn the world around
    We can turn the earth's revolution
    We have the power
    People have the power ...

Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •