Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: The US 'snitch' system of justice

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member seabhcan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    14,309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default The US 'snitch' system of justice

    In the US, sentences are mandatory of many crimes. This means if the prosecutor accuses you of a crime carrying 25 years, the judge cannot take any other factors into account - he must jail you for 25 years.

    The only 'out' is to help incriminate other people. If a police officer forces or tricks someone into committing a crime, thats entrapment and the case is thrown out. If the police officer forces someone else to entrap a 3rd person - thats ok.

    The story of John Horner is very interesting. He was talked into sharing prescription drugs with a friend who couldn't afford them - and was then arrested for drug dealing. The friend had, it turned out, been arrested and threatened with 25 years unless he incriminated others. John was offered the same deal. Find 5 more people who can be arrested for drugs offences and see your sentence reduced.

    BBC News - The trouble with using police informants in the US

    Under the deal he signed with prosecutors, he agreed to plead guilty. But if he helped make prosecutable cases against five other people on drug-trafficking charges - charges carrying 25-year minimum terms - his own sentence could be reduced from 25 years to 10.

    That choice - put crudely, do the time or snitch - is one faced by thousands of Americans every year.
    Then there is the case of 23 year old Rachel Hoffman who was arrested, threatened with 5 years in jail, and then sent out on the street with a wire and no training and a mission to track down drug dealers. She was dead a few hours later - murdered by a drug dealer who quickly found the wire.

    Mad system - hopefully it will never arrive on these shores. But it explains part of how the US manages to jail 1% of its entire population.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member Kevin Parlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    10,202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I read the link. What a horrible and sad story. I think perhaps where you have the likes of sherrifs being elected rather than appointed and the sherrif reporting to a mayor, an intense degree of populism is brought into things and there is a tendency to police by numbers. Like a "Todd Stelzer Snr as sherrif increased convictions for drug trafficking by 18% last year!" type of environment.

    Europe sentences too lightly IMO. The States do it too heavily. I think Australia gets it about right (though we have police corruption issues here too).
    "It is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them." - Thomas Sowell

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    11,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    If they really wanted to stop the illegal drugs trade, they'd go after the places where the big money goes through.

    ''According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the
    money produced by drug trafficking throughout the world reached $460 billion in
    1993, of which the U.S. received $260 billion, which is circulated through its financial system, as contraband, and through other ways. Colombia, as a producer-exporter, gets only $5 to $7 billion, or 2 to 3% of what remains in the U.S. The big business is, therefore, in that country.''
    Apolinar Biaz-Callejas, "Violence in Colombia, its History," Latin America News Update (Chicago, IL), Vol. 10, No. 12, December 1994, pp. 19-20
    The world is a very puzzling place. If you're not willing to be puzzled, you just become a replica of someone else's mind.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    11,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Parlon View Post
    Europe sentences too lightly IMO. The States do it too heavily. I think Australia gets it about right (though we have police corruption issues here too).
    Prevention is better than cure.
    The world is a very puzzling place. If you're not willing to be puzzled, you just become a replica of someone else's mind.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    11,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    And if they really wanted to reduce the reoffending rate they wouldn't have removed the Pell grants.
    Think if you were in that situation.
    Young black male living in the ghetto, with little to no solid employment opportunity, reduced education grants to help you and welfare from the government which isn't enough. What else are they gonna do but sell drugs?
    The world is a very puzzling place. If you're not willing to be puzzled, you just become a replica of someone else's mind.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member 'orebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    In corrigible
    Posts
    20,289
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Parlon View Post
    I read the link. What a horrible and sad story. I think perhaps where you have the likes of sherrifs being elected rather than appointed and the sherrif reporting to a mayor, an intense degree of populism is brought into things and there is a tendency to police by numbers. Like a "Todd Stelzer Snr as sherrif increased convictions for drug trafficking by 18% last year!" type of environment.

    Europe sentences too lightly IMO. The States do it too heavily. I think Australia gets it about right (though we have police corruption issues here too).
    It's not just at county or state level. The feds do it too.
    I remember seeing a documentary about a young Deadhead who was approached by some undercover feds, who knew he liked to dose, to sell them some acid at a Grateful Dead show. He told them he wasn't a dealer and couldn't help them. He was approached by them again at the next stop (Deadheads tended to follow the band from one venue to the next for as many shows as they could afford throughout a tour) and again told them he wasn't a dealer and couldn't help them.
    He was approached by the same guys 5 or 6 times at different shows in different cities with the same result. The last time he was approached his VW van had broken down and he was stranded so he told the guys he might be able to sort something. Bear in mind that LSD was the drug of choice at Dead shows and was readily available to anyone in the know.
    He organised someone to get him a batch and met the guys in a motel room whereupon he was promptly busted and received the 10 year mandatory minimum in a federal penitentiary.
    Scary stuff as at the time I had been to see a bunch of Dead shows and had actually met this guy. He used to sell grilled cheese sandwiches from the back of his camper after the show for gas money to the next gig.
    "It is important therefore that I clarify to the House that in the first instance there are significant monies within Anglo-Irish to take the strain of loan losses arising over the next three or four years, before State support is engaged." Brian Lenihan 15/01/09

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by james5001 View Post
    If they really wanted to stop the illegal drugs trade, they'd go after the places where the big money goes through.

    ''According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the
    money produced by drug trafficking throughout the world reached $460 billion in
    1993, of which the U.S. received $260 billion, which is circulated through its financial system, as contraband, and through other ways. Colombia, as a producer-exporter, gets only $5 to $7 billion, or 2 to 3% of what remains in the U.S. The big business is, therefore, in that country.''
    Apolinar Biaz-Callejas, "Violence in Colombia, its History," Latin America News Update (Chicago, IL), Vol. 10, No. 12, December 1994, pp. 19-20
    It is the one that I always wonder is where all that drug money gets laundered. Even if the values of what is claimed to be traded are even 40% of what it is estimated* to be it is still a hell of a lot of money requiring laundering.

    *Note I never pay a lot of heed to values estimated by law enforcement agencies as they would tend to ignore prudence and go for the higher valuation. This isn't an indictment of these law enforcement agencies, it is merely human nature to pick the highest possible figure when saying "look how well I did" when making this seizure of drugs.
    "If we can but prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy." - Thomas Jefferson

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member james5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    11,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tea Party Patriot View Post
    It is the one that I always wonder is where all that drug money gets laundered. Even if the values of what is claimed to be traded are even 40% of what it is estimated* to be it is still a hell of a lot of money requiring laundering.

    *Note I never pay a lot of heed to values estimated by law enforcement agencies as they would tend to ignore prudence and go for the higher valuation. This isn't an indictment of these law enforcement agencies, it is merely human nature to pick the highest possible figure when saying "look how well I did" when making this seizure of drugs.
    Regarding the Note part you're right. But this is from the OECD.
    Regarding your bold point- That's the key point. The more money one makes the harder it is to launder. If you ever watched breaking bad it shows that. Massive institutions are laundering this money. Household names.

    Is the system still in place where banks have to inform the FEDS if a cash deposit of more than $10,000 dollars is made? According to what I have read, the Republicans de-regulated this system in the 80's (so much for the drugs war), but was it ever re-introduced?
    The world is a very puzzling place. If you're not willing to be puzzled, you just become a replica of someone else's mind.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Oh I thought that we also had a State sponsored system of secret snitching on social welfare "cheats" (in the moral parlance of the touts ) in this country too - what's the official figure now something like 28,000 of the scum living amongst us

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seabhcan View Post
    In the US, sentences are mandatory of many crimes. This means if the prosecutor accuses you of a crime carrying 25 years, the judge cannot take any other factors into account - he must jail you for 25 years.

    The only 'out' is to help incriminate other people. If a police officer forces or tricks someone into committing a crime, thats entrapment and the case is thrown out. If the police officer forces someone else to entrap a 3rd person - thats ok.

    The story of John Horner is very interesting. He was talked into sharing prescription drugs with a friend who couldn't afford them - and was then arrested for drug dealing. The friend had, it turned out, been arrested and threatened with 25 years unless he incriminated others. John was offered the same deal. Find 5 more people who can be arrested for drugs offences and see your sentence reduced.

    BBC News - The trouble with using police informants in the US



    Then there is the case of 23 year old Rachel Hoffman who was arrested, threatened with 5 years in jail, and then sent out on the street with a wire and no training and a mission to track down drug dealers. She was dead a few hours later - murdered by a drug dealer who quickly found the wire.

    Mad system - hopefully it will never arrive on these shores. But it explains part of how the US manages to jail 1% of its entire population.
    That's why if called to jury duty, I go gladly, and I will not convict for minor offences, minor drug offence? You're walking. Americans need to know about the jury system and its power, it is the last defense against tyranny.

    | Fully Informed Jury Association

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •