Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 33 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 328

Thread: Some Members of the Gay Community are Not Very Consistent when Quoting Research Findings

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Some Members of the Gay Community are Not Very Consistent when Quoting Research Findings

    Recently Colm O’Gorman, on the Late Late Show, criticised gay parenting research research based on the so called ‘Regnerus Study’ ( http://www.utexas.edu/opa/wordpress/...iry-Report.pdf ScienceDirect.com - Social Science Research - Methodological decisions and the evaluation of possible effects of different family structures on children: The new family structures survey (NFSS) ) – in attacking the Regnerus findings he told the audience that the major problem was that there were only 175 lesbian parent, and 73 gay parent cases in the sample.

    However, on Prime Time this week Matt Krivinowsky (?) referred to recent research from Susan Golombok which, according to him, clearly showed that there are no differences in outcomes for children whether that child is raised by hetereosexual, gay or lesbian couples Prime Time - RTÉ Player (from time 16.45 onwards) . The research he referred to is mentioned in this link Children in gay adoptions at no disadvantage - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent . Details about the sample size can be found at Study Says Kids of Gay Parents Are Thriving Just As Well as Heterosexual Counterparts | G Philly

    The study, which chronicles the experience of 130 adoptive families (49 heterosexual, 41 by gay men and 40 by lesbians), showed “markedly more similarities than differences between family types,” says Professor Susan Golombok, director of the Centre for Family Research and co-author of the report
    So some proponents of gay marriage, such as Colm O’Gorman, aggressively rubbish some studies because of their sample size while at the same time deliberately ignoring the same argument with respect other studies on the issue that they quote when actively promoting the case for gay marriage as Matt Krivinowsky (?) did. Is this not blatant hypocrisy?

    The statistical reality is that it is impossible to generalise to any population of interest about outcomes for children from sample sizes of the order of 30/40 in the sub groups looked at. A statistically representative minimum sample size of 300 is needed from each sub group before any defensible generalisations (with stated limitations in conclusion drawing) can be made. Even then, ideally, further replication studies are required from different researchers before a high level of confidence can be placed in the findings.

    Susan Golombok’s research in this area is notorious for making sweeping generalisations about outcomes for children based on what is methodologically very unsound research e.g. Children raised in mother-headed families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers, at early adulthood where she compared 27 heterosexual parenting situations to 20 lesbian parenting situations, and then bizarrely (from a methodological perspective) concluded that “The findings of this study show that children raised by solo heterosexual mothers or lesbian mothers from infancy continue to function well as they enter adulthood (sic)”. Of course all she has sown is that she generalised from a meaningless piece of ‘research’, using two samples of 27 and 20, to the 7,000,000,000 other humans (ignoring aspects such as socio-economic, demographic, ethnic, cultural, educational background factors) on Planet Earth.

    Most of the extant research with respect to gay and lesbian parenting is not unlike that garnered by an opinion pollster who bases his or her opinion on the following research methodology - “I'm off down to the pub tonight to do an opinion poll on the current standing of our political parties and I am going to ask RTE to publicise, without any validation, the results when I have done the analysis on the back of a cigarette pack!” .

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member ger12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    48,228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    O.K.

    Am really looking forward to voting in favor of gay marriage. Landslide I'm predicting.
    At 12 weeks the “clump of cells” toes curl, her mouth makes sucking movements, she has a human face and if you prod the tummy she will move in response

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member dizillusioned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    14,778
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    I suggest the OP'er look at "The New Normal" and lighten up a bit.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member FrankSpeaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tralee
    Posts
    4,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    There's a lot to be said for the fellow who doesn't say it himself. -- Maurice Switzer

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member livingstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    22,765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ppcoyle View Post
    Recently Colm O’Gorman, on the Late Late Show, criticised gay parenting research research based on the so called ‘Regnerus Study’ ( http://www.utexas.edu/opa/wordpress/...iry-Report.pdf ScienceDirect.com - Social Science Research - Methodological decisions and the evaluation of possible effects of different family structures on children: The new family structures survey (NFSS) ) – in attacking the Regnerus findings he told the audience that the major problem was that there were only 175 lesbian parent, and 73 gay parent cases in the sample.
    Actually that's wrong. I don't even remember O'Gorman mentioning the sample size and if he did, it certainly wasn't the focus of his criticism.

    The focus of his criticism was that a study that claimed to be about gay parenting actually studied children of parents who had ever had a homosexual sexual relationship. So when the anti-gay marriage side bandy it about as a reason to oppose stable, same-sex couples raising children, it is ridiculous to use a study that compared stable heterosexual couples with parents who, at some point, had a gay sexual relationship.

    Why? Because the latter group will have included closeted parents, parents who were in prison, parents who had separated - all of which can give rise to disadvantages for kids.

    The sample really wasn't the issue, it was the methodology he was critical of.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member stopdoingstuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    east and west
    Posts
    22,736
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Faoi mhóid bheith saor

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,065
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    petunia

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member Cruimh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    County Londonderry
    Posts
    35,432
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Gays - the new Jooooos.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Twin Towers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Don't most homosexual guys prefer to pursue straight men? Heard that recently and apparently it's true.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member shoneen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,817
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I'm not too worried about the whole gay marriage thing. Hell, welcome aboard, be as miserable as the rest of us

    But it is depressing how supposedly intelligent people are willing to skew results and interpretations to suit their own view. Not sure if hypocrisy is too strong a word. They just don't seem able to see the contradiction. When "they" do it, it's an outrage, but when "we" do it, it's OK.

Page 1 of 33 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •