Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 112

Thread: New Eyesore at Dublin Castle

  1. #1
    Dylan2010
    Guest

    Default New Eyesore at Dublin Castle

    One ugly addition to a very historic part of Dublin City



    http://i.imgur.com/o195cXn.jpg


    An Taisce seeks removal of slab on historic street - RTÉ News


    Dublin City Council has defended its decision to place a concrete slab on one of the capital’s most historic streets.

    The slab, which is intended as a traffic calming measure, has been built beside City Hall, in front of an entrance to Dublin Castle.

    An Taisce got on the case

    Originally Posted by An Taisce

    February 8, 2013

    Re: Legal Complaint – Re: Erection of Concrete Base Structure and No. 3 Flagpoles adjacent to City Hall at Cork Hill, Dublin.

    Dear Mr Worrell,

    Further to our email to Michael Philips City Engineer yesterday and to our telephone conversation this afternoon we thank you for confirming that there has been no consent under Part 8 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001.

    The concrete structure already inserted and proposed flag pole placement is highly injurious to the setting of major protected structures namely the City Hall, main entrance to Dublin Castle and the former Newconem Bank now the Rates Office.

    This is one of the city’s iconic architectural ensembles featuring in a Malton print and State Visit arrivals to Dublin Castle.

    The main pediment of the City Hall has three flag poles and the Rates Office three on the portico. The insertion of flagpoles on this site is unnecessary and unjustified apart from being visually deleterious.

    In addition to this the structure erected is a waste of public money.

    We do not consider any claim that the work is exempt from Part 8 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 consent because of sub threshold cost of the project applies and also because of the location of the works affecting major Protected Structures.

    The claim made by Paul Heffernan Media Relations and Corporate Communications, Dublin City Council, this afternoon that “the structure is to provide more protection to pedestrians on this street. City Hall is on the Dublin walk from Trinity to Kilmainham and the left turn from Parliament St can be very busy, the works therefore provide a traffic calming measure. A part 8 wasn’t necessary”, has no basis.

    Traffic calming has already been achieved by the erection of the line of black bollards half way across Cork Hill and there is no need for an additional structure particularly the large lumpy intrusive concrete structure inserted.

    We request that the concrete base be removed forthwith and that no further works proceed.

    We are also referring the matter to the OPW and Department of Arts Heritage and the Gaeltacht.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ian Lumley

    Built Environment Heritage Officer,
    An Taisce

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member irishpancake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Westmeath enclave of Meath West
    Posts
    17,783
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    That's horrible.......vandals


  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    It really is quite an appalling erection. It's beyond belief - even if you overlook both the lack of planning permission (the most blatant of double standards) and how inappropriate this concrete mess is in this particular location - it is the possibly the most over-engineered traffic redirection solution of all time. Would a 'No left turn' sign and a white line not have done the same job?

    The plastic bollards they recently put there (before the slab) were already ugly and unnecessary, but surely they were doing this job already. What does the slab add? I have crossed the road there hundreds of times without being hit, nearly hit, or even vaguely impeded by cars turning up off Dame St.

    DCC seem intent on slowly eroding every visually appealing, historically interesting or sensibly designed feature left in this city and replacing it with a patchwork of nonsense cobbled together illegally by incompetents.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member Sister Mercedes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    20,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greykettle View Post
    It really is quite an appalling erection.
    It looks like an appalling erection that toppled over.

  5. #5

    Default

    its strange something do with secuirty more then traffic?
    If I ask a question don't just 'like' the post, reply to it. - If I post a lot about a subject I may write a post about it at http://dublinstreams.blogspot.ie/

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member Podolski1.5's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    577
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Looks like an unfinished handball alley or one of those waste glass bays.
    "The rich always betray the poor"- Henry Joy McCracken

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    These people actively hate the heritage of the city.

    By the 1930s, plans were discussed in Éamon de Valera's government to demolish all of Merrion Square, perhaps the most intact of the five squares, on the basis that the houses were "old fashioned" and "un-national". They were only saved by Adolf Hitler's invasion of Poland in 1939 and a general lack of capital and investment; the plans were put on hold in 1939 and forgotten about by 1945.
    At some point the gloves must come off and we face our adversaries.
    We're all Rhodesians now.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irishpancake View Post
    That's horrible.......vandals

    What do you expect from the muck savages that run our city, most do not even live in Dublin, much less come from Dublin. This is yet another example of the so-called executive acting in a manner which further damages the fabric and built architecture of my city. The same clowns who expect us to pay a tax on our homes to maintain their outrageous and undeserved salaries.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member pinemartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Big D
    Posts
    6,698
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    FG and the Labour party have the majority on Dublin City Council. Are these the "these people" you are talking about?

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I was, a few years ago, at a talk given by a heritage officer of one the Dublin Local Authorities and she lamented the fact that for projects under a certain budget the Roads/Engineering Department did not have to consult the Heritage Division on whether the project would impact on nearby architectural or historical monuments etc. In fact, she stated that she suspected that Roads/Engineering Departments would often deliberately break some jobs up into smaller separate projects so as to avoid the hassle of dealing with heritage issues. It is for this reason that historic stone walls or small stone bridges are often replaced without any account taken of their historic value or importance - or large unsightly concrete barriers erected beside important buildings.

Page 1 of 12 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •