Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Excellent investment management for only a quarter of a percent fee a year

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    13,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Excellent investment management for only a quarter of a percent fee a year

    I read in The Telegraph last week that pension fund investors are belatedly finding out after many years that management fees of their investment managers have soaked up about half of the investment returns in their pension fund. That shows that even intelligent people with money to invest failed to pay attention to compound interest lessons in primary school and didn't understand their investment advisers' percentage take in fee systems.

    About thirty years ago,the solution to high active manager fees was invented-index funds in the US,known as index tracker funds in the UK,that weigh investments to follow the same weighting of shares in popular indexes such as the Dow Jones or the Footsie. Oddly,they outperform managed funds for two reasons-their wide diversification across a broad index of shares picks up high returns available on small to middle size companies that most active fund managers haven't time to research;and their selection of shares through computerised software that tracks particular indexes is a very low cost business model that allows very low discounted management fees. The leader in low cost index funds and a more recent variation of them known as Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) is Vanguard in the US. It happens to have Irish domiciled funds charging extremely low fees https://www.vanguard.co.uk/uk/mvc/in...s/etf#fundstab
    For all I know, there may be many other funds offering similarly low fees.

    Index tracking works best in broadly diversified stock market indices,unlike the bank dominated Irish market in the past. The more that active managers influence prices,the less an index tracker fund loses from overpriced shares and it gets a free ride on investment research costs.In developing markets,there is evidence that managed funds do better than market indices when typical lack of research results in mispriced shares,giving an advantage to research-based share selection.
    Last edited by patslatt; 11th January 2013 at 12:25 PM.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member ruserious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    In the Bunker...Returning Fire!
    Posts
    29,323
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Boycott the "Irish" Sun rag.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member bonkers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruserious View Post
    It's even worse than that, this poster is actually Walter Mitty. Beware.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    13,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bonkers View Post
    It's even worse than that, this poster is actually Walter Mitty. Beware.
    Troll

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    D4
    Posts
    232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Index tracking is like flying on auto pilot so instead of seasoned pilots you fly by computer it is a lot cheaper but only works to outperform human management in large stock parts of developed efficient markets where human investigation and reasoning is cancelled out by the sheer volume and quality of research on PLCs instantly available to all participants. Hence tracking the S&P 500 or or Govt Bonds makes oodles of sense.

    But it becomes a distinct disadvantage for just about everything else, natural resources, small and mid cap stocks, emerging markets, corporate bonds, hedge funds, private equity, property, metal miners, etc.

    Finally the type of stupid calculation promulgated by the poorly informed that reports the impact of management fees versus an entirely free system is a pure distraction. If you want to reduce costs, then simplify pensions. The market is a labyrinth of dumb rules that "experts" are needed to translate. Then with one simplified pension scheme for all, centralise admin functions and streamline advice on line giving punters the choice of mega funds with tiny fees managed by say the NTMA and higher cost boutique fund managers specialising in tranches of the market. But this idea that there is a silver bullet with "cheapest is best" written on it is wilfully dangerous BS that regularly appears in newspapers next to the article on how to save money on electricity by turning down the heat.

    (Oops meant to add as a very recent and practical example of flying auto-pilot, the patently dangerous model promoted constantly by Burgess to invest in shares purely and exclusively by buying the ISEQ, despite it's 40% bank content at peak, highly concentrated nature and containing no stock big enough to make the Eurostoxx 50. Anyone following Burgess index tracking only mantra lost a fortune, as he did with a million in AIB shares).
    Last edited by Pissyknickers; 9th January 2013 at 08:22 AM.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member daveL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by patslatt View Post
    I read in The Telegraph last week that pension fund investors are belatedly finding out after many years that management fees of their investment managers have soaked up about half of the investment returns in their pension fund. That shows that even intelligent people with money to invest failed to pay attention to compound interest lessons in primary school and didn't understand their investment advisers' percentage take in fee systems.

    About thirty years ago,the solution to high active manager fees was invented-index funds in the US,known as index tracker funds in the UK,that weigh investments to follow the same weighting of shares in popular indexes such as the Dow Jones or the Footsie. Oddly,they outperform managed funds for two reasons-their wide diversification across a broad index of shares picks up high returns available on small to middle size companies that most active fund managers haven't time to research;and their selection of shares through computerised software that tracks particular indexes is a very low cost business model that allows very low discounted management fees. The leader in low cost index funds and a more recent variation of them known as Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) is Vanguard in the US. It happens to have Irish domiciled funds charging extremely low fees https://www.vanguard.co.uk/uk/mvc/in...s/etf#fundstab
    For all I know, there may be many other funds offering similarly low fees.
    You have the oddest posting style... Is it a question? A statement? An essay? A commentary? ???

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member greengoose2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Planet Enda, Tír na nÓg
    Posts
    25,433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daveL View Post
    You have the oddest posting style... Is it a question? A statement? An essay? A commentary? ???
    No, it's superposter.


  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member Howya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Lass' sie nach Irland kommen
    Posts
    1,686
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    There are reports that suggest that approx 60% of actively managed funds under perform the market
    Approx. 60% of Funds UNDER-PERFORM Broad Market Indices So Is Investing Success Just Luck? | munKNEE.com

    So the real skill is either picking ETF's or picking one of the better fund managers (past performance is no guarantee of future performance).
    “Still paying, still to owe. Eternal woe! ” ― Paradise Lost, John Milton

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Longford
    Posts
    5,095
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Howya View Post
    There are reports that suggest that approx 60% of actively managed funds under perform the market
    Approx. 60% of Funds UNDER-PERFORM Broad Market Indices So Is Investing Success Just Luck? | munKNEE.com

    So the real skill is either picking ETF's or picking one of the better fund managers (past performance is no guarantee of future performance).
    Wasn,t there an experiment run some time ago whereby a monkey throwing darts at a board outperformed half of the so called investment experts, and, presumably the monkey didn't charge a fee, maybe a few bananas.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member bonkers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by patslatt View Post
    Troll
    No. Just calling you out.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •