Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Income Tax Rates V Cuts to Carers & Respite Care

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member peter barrins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Income Tax Rates V Cuts to Carers & Respite Care

    I have just been listening to Paschal Donohoe and Maureen O'Sullivan on the RTE1 'This Week' programme.
    Last edited by peter barrins; 2nd February 2018 at 07:24 AM.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member making waves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    18,588
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    The really interesting thing from that programme was that car retailers selling high-end cars have booming sales - why - because the rich are being protected while working class people are being hammered by austerity. The richest 10% of the population have seen their income INCREASE year on year since 2008 and they are using the money to buy beamers, jags and 4-wheel-drive gas-guzzlers.
    Separate Church and State

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kildare, but really from Cork
    Posts
    8,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by making waves View Post
    The really interesting thing from that programme was that car retailers selling high-end cars have booming sales - why - because the rich are being protected while working class people are being hammered by austerity. The richest 10% of the population have seen their income INCREASE year on year since 2008 and they are using the money to buy beamers, jags and 4-wheel-drive gas-guzzlers.
    Thats because finance is so cheap, a new Audi 4 will cost you €349 per month.

    If we were paying the same tax as we were in 2008 we would have €1600 more per month in net income, than we have now.

    So stop talking shyte, any increases that we have is due to hard work, not less taxation.

    Finally the A4 is simply superb.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member Frank Galton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Meath in exile.
    Posts
    1,366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Colm McCarthy -- hardly a loony left denizen:

    The Achilles tendon in budgetary strategy remains the TUPs, the three unwise promises made before the election. These were to protect public service pay rates, social welfare payments and to eschew increases in the two rates of income tax. A one per cent increase in the 20 per cent rate and in the 41 per cent rate would deliver almost €700m in a full year, create unbridled outrage for about a week and would have yielded 25 times the cash from the controversial cut in the respite allowance for carers. If you enter the ring with your hands tied behind your back, you can expect to ship a lot of punishment.
    Colm McCarthy: Budget overshoot is on cards as is a dreaded second bailout - Analysis, Opinion - Independent.ie
    The Daily Mail -- the world's biggest cut-and-paste operation.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kildare, but really from Cork
    Posts
    8,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Galton View Post
    In other words tax the working masses more, in favour of so called poor....

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member making waves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    18,588
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bob3367 View Post
    Thats because finance is so cheap, a new Audi 4 will cost you €349 per month.

    If we were paying the same tax as we were in 2008 we would have €1600 more per month in net income, than we have now.

    So stop talking shyte, any increases that we have is due to hard work, not less taxation.
    FACT - the richest 10% of the population have seen their income INCREASE year-on-year since the beginning of the economic collapse.
    FACT - the remaining 90% of the population have seen their income DECREASE year-on-year since the beginning of the economic collapse.

    Why - because the 90% are being forced to pay the gambling debts of the richest 10% while the richest 10% pay ******************************-all extra in tax and instead show off by spending (a small amount of) it on big cars etc. I am one of the people you constantly attack on here as being an 'overpaid, lazy' public servant - I drive a 12 year old car and will not be getting another one until it falls apart (then it will be the cheapest thing possible that goes).

    The 'hard work' that the rich are engaged in is cutting jobs and cutting wages so their profits increase - with the mantra 'don't waste the opportunites of a good recession' to screw working people - and they are being faciliated by the government they have bank-rolled who preach about the dangers of increasing taxes on the rich while cutting respite grants and welfare for OAPs.

    The government in this country are implementing a policy of welfare for the richest 10% (who are hiding all their wealth in the Caymens) and austerity for everyone else. Don't expect the 90% to continue bending over and taking it up the rear end from the likes of you.
    Separate Church and State

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cylon-occupied Caprica
    Posts
    3,658
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Why is it always a choice between tax hikes and cuts to the "vulnerable"?

    Why is it never a choice between cutting 1) public sector pay and benefits or 2) undeserving social welfare recipients and cuts to the vulnerable?

    Socialists want the vulnerable to be protected. Just as long as it doesn't in any way affect their public sector or scroungers voting base.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cylon-occupied Caprica
    Posts
    3,658
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by making waves View Post
    FACT - the richest 10% of the population have seen their income INCREASE year-on-year since the beginning of the economic collapse.
    FACT - the remaining 90% of the population have seen their income DECREASE year-on-year since the beginning of the economic collapse.
    And what of ALL the available evidence (ESRI, OECD, Dept of Finance) which shows that the richest have paid by far the most in proportion to their income in new taxes since the recession began?

    They produce actual evidence showing this, not just political slogans.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Analyzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland - without forgiveness, there is dysfunctionality.
    Posts
    46,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter barrins View Post
    I have just been listening to Paschal Donohoe and Maureen O'Sullivan on the RTE1 'This Week' programme. Again, Paschal trots out the line that increasing rates of income tax will increase "the cost of creating a job" in Ireland. This is a fallacy and it is disingenuous and one that various TD's and Ministers regularly resort to in defence of refusing to impose pain on the better off - themselves included. The presenter, of course, didn't challenge Paschal's feeble assertion.

    I have worked in various sectors, including the multinational one and employers do not give a toss about income tax rates - there is no cost to them. In the late nineties and early noughties income tax rates were significantly higher than they are today (top rate 48%), yet there was strong inward investment, high levels of job creation, economic growth and there was immigration - people were coming to Ireland to work!

    I don't believe that most people in the 41% tax band would have had an issue with an additional 1 or 2% if it meant that carers and those being cared for, particularly children, had a dignified and less difficult existence. To suggest otherwise is, to be quite frank, convenient rot.

    This budget is shameful and there is no other word for it. Any right-minded citizen could only be ashamed of the cuts to child benefit, respite grants and carers - the MOST vulnerable in our society - people who, day in day out, lovingly give of themselves to care for others. If they refused to do so, the cost to the State would be much greater. Cuts to Child Benefit expose the recent Children's Referendum for the cynical cod that is was.

    Meanwhile, at Leinster House, TDs like Pashcal and Maureen get €1,000 per month for clocking in at work, are paid €92,000 per annum and a raft of other expenses - not forgetting, of course, the large pensions entitlements. To stand before people who have been savaged and are suffering must require a deficit of conscience or a high level of brazeness - or both.
    The whole essence of this OP is disingeuous.

    Tax on a wage in the mid 30s (which is average in Ireland) is at 52% not 41%. After that people get taxed 23% VAT on providing for themselves. The provider of goods and services also has to push up his pricing to make up for the demands of local authorities who are demanding local authority rates at punitive levels. (and this is reducing employment of women).

    Maybe you are earning so much money that you are completely oblivious to all of this.

    A better comparison would be "cost of sending Big Fill on another junket versus cost of reducing certain services".

    Or cost of paying union fat cats in quango jobs fund versus cost of scaling back services.

    "Willfull waste makes woeful want".
    Coveney's ambition is the be Ireland's next EU Commissar and Ireland will pay a price as he builds his CV to position himself sufficiently loyal to the nEU empire.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    4,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Tubbs View Post
    Why is it always a choice between tax hikes and cuts to the "vulnerable"?

    Why is it never a choice between cutting 1) public sector pay and benefits or 2) undeserving social welfare recipients and cuts to the vulnerable?

    Socialists want the vulnerable to be protected. Just as long as it doesn't in any way affect their public sector or scroungers voting base.



    Jaysus! who let the shaggin ff dogs out today!

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •