Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 53 123451151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 528

Thread: Time for pro-choice campaigners to get equal time in taxpayer-funded schools?

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,996
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Time for pro-choice campaigners to get equal time in taxpayer-funded schools?

    I went to a religious-run school where the anti-choice agenda was pushed harder than actual faith. There was no instruction in catechism, but plentiful encouragement of referring to foetuses as "babies".

    A lot of anti-abortion campaigners pretend that their stance is a non-religious one. This is obviously false when you examine it. Creationists also claim to be non-religious, with the same falsity.

    There are a handful of people who claim to be atheists but also take an anti-choice view. They use this fact to claim that the anti-choice worldview is not religious or faith-based, but in fact compatible with logic and reason. This is false.

    A belief in God or Gods or an afterlife is not in fact necessary for a given belief to be a religious, non-rational one. You don't need to believe in Papal infallibility, Jesus, Moses, Buddha, Allah, the ghosts of your ancestors or the tree spirits to be religious.

    You can be religious without any of these things. To be religious simply means to believe in something independently of evidence. For example, the belief in machine elves is religion without a God: Machine elf - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    It's quite easy to tell a non-religious belief from a religious one. Assume that a given belief is X. The way to tell whether belief in X is religious or secular is as follows:

    Find someone who believes in X.
    Ask him "What evidence will I have to present to you in order to convince you that X is untrue?"
    The believer's response will tell you whether his belief is religious or not.
    If he says "Well, if you can present me with evidence Y, I will abandon my belief in X" then the person is using reason, not faith.
    If he says "There is no evidence that could change my mind on X" then it's religion.

    For X, let's assign the belief that human life begins at conception, rather than the previously universally-held worldwide belief that it begins at birth. Ask any anti-choice person: "What evidence will I have to present to you in order to convince you that life begins at a point subsequent to conception?"

    The answer, of course, is that all scientific inquiry is irrelevant to this person's belief. His views are immune to all currently-existing evidence, and any evidence that scientists will ever produce in the future. He already knows that a conception results in a glob of sixteen cells with no organs or nerves, and he already ignores this fact and calls the glob of cells a baby. Evidence is not a factor in this person's thought process on this issue.

    On this method of analysis (made popular in the 20th century by Karl Popper) anti-abortion dogma is revealed to be a faith and not amenable to logic or evidence. Therefore by banning abortion the religious are forcing their faith on non-believers.

    So it's time for the Irish Choice Network to be given access to the schools to correct the abusive indoctrination of young minds with fair counter-propaganda. Then, once each student has been given an equal dose of pro- and anti-choice propaganda, withdraw all propaganda on the issue.

    But schools must continue to teach the non-equivalence of faith and science. Anti-abortion campaigners will whine that that gives the pro-choice side an advantage, because reality sides with science over religion. I would retort that the human brain's bias toward illogical beliefs gives religion a far more powerful advantage, though.
    Last edited by feargach; 9th December 2012 at 04:32 PM.
    When you see the words "Mises" or "Hayek" in someone's post, just ask yourself: do I really want to ban paper money and go back to gold?

    You have to pity the kind of people who buy into conspiracy theories. I find the following to be the saddest words on the internet: "Re: connection between Bilderberg puppet lady gaga and viral outbreak in ukraine "

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member Cellach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I would disagree. Political campaigning or moral education should have no place in state funded schools. Private non state funded schools should be allowed teach whatever zany idea the parents wish.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member Tea Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    4,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by feargach View Post
    to correct the abusive indoctrination of young minds with fair counter-propaganda.
    Dogma, schools and counter-propaganda. Love it.
    A nation that keeps one eye on the past is wise. A nation that keeps two eyes on the past is blind.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,996
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cellach View Post
    I would disagree. Political campaigning or moral education should have no place in schools.
    What about facts? Do they have a place?

    Does the assertion that life begins at the moment of the creation of a glob of 16 cells have a place there?
    When you see the words "Mises" or "Hayek" in someone's post, just ask yourself: do I really want to ban paper money and go back to gold?

    You have to pity the kind of people who buy into conspiracy theories. I find the following to be the saddest words on the internet: "Re: connection between Bilderberg puppet lady gaga and viral outbreak in ukraine "

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cylon-occupied Caprica
    Posts
    3,658
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    What a ridiculous OP.

    Any attempt to introduce children to the (pretty disturbing) issue of abortion, be it from a pro-life or pro-choice perspective, is grotesque in my book.

    Children are by their nature, innocent. And to them babies are babies, whether in the womb or out, and I think to introduce them to any form of debate over what is and isn't a baby would be ridiculous and scarring.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member mr. jings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    8,063
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I remember in our school in the eighties, in about third or fourth year, a young lay teacher asking the class that if a young teenage girl was pregnant after beng raped by her father, should she be allowed an abortion. More than half of us rasied our hands, and then got treated to a lecture on mortal sin and being ranted out of it by the teacher. Poor show.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,996
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Tubbs View Post
    What a ridiculous OP.

    Any attempt to introduce children to the (pretty disturbing) issue of abortion, be it from a pro-life or pro-choice perspective, is grotesque in my book.

    Children are by their nature, innocent. And to them babies are babies, whether in the womb or out, and I think to introduce them to any form of debate over what is and isn't a baby would be ridiculous and scarring.
    So did your school not include propaganda to the effect that the moment a sperm enters the egg, it's a baby?

    I'm not aware of any schools in Ireland where anti-abortion propaganda is not present.
    When you see the words "Mises" or "Hayek" in someone's post, just ask yourself: do I really want to ban paper money and go back to gold?

    You have to pity the kind of people who buy into conspiracy theories. I find the following to be the saddest words on the internet: "Re: connection between Bilderberg puppet lady gaga and viral outbreak in ukraine "

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    13,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Devilishly clever OP!

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Cellach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by feargach View Post
    What about facts? Do they have a place?

    Does the assertion that life begins at the moment of the creation of a glob of 16 cells have a place there?
    Facts of course always have there place. My point is that I would not approve of publicly funded schools becoming ideological battlegrounds for pro and anti campaigners. I've created a thread before on my disapproval of the religious right secretly propagandising schools. I believe the best solution is to stop this happening in publicly funded schools, rather then allow an equal right for each side of a contentious issue to give their presentations in secondary schools. There is something fundamentally dishonest I my mind about the idea of giving a political presentation to a group of people who aren't even of age to vote.

    http://www.politics.ie/forum/educati...r-schools.html

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cylon-occupied Caprica
    Posts
    3,658
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by feargach View Post
    So did your school not include propaganda to the effect that the moment a sperm enters the egg, it's a baby?
    Oh, you mean "biology". Yeah, I really think we need to stop public money being spent on this sort of hocus pocus....

Page 1 of 53 123451151 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •