Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Planning ahead - How to run a referendum next time.

  1. #1
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Planning ahead - How to run a referendum next time.

    Changing our Constitution can only happen by agreement of the people by way of referendum.

    As the Supreme Court said on Thursday:

    "The people adopted the Constitution 75 years ago. The Constitution belongs to the people and may be amended only by the people in a Referendum. It is this democratic process which is protected by the McKenna principles. Public funding should not be used in a Referendum to espouse a particular point of view."

    If you want a great short primer on why change requires direct public approval check out the historical presentation by High Court Judge Gerard Hogan at this site Constitution Project @ UCC | Constitution Project is an interdisciplinary research cluster at UCC. You will need to roll down the page past four other items before you get to the heading 'The Referendum Process'. There is the video clip and it is really worth viewing to understand why in 1937 it was decided to keep the power to change the Constitution in the hands of the entire electorate and not give it to elected representatives.

    The other clip to view there directly on point is UCC Constitutional Law lecturer Dr Maria Cahill. Her account of the Courts upholding that principle under severe pressure is excellent, and again concise.

    40 minutes tops and then if you really want some reading material check out the gold standard for running a referendum here:

    Code of good practice on Referendums adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 19th meeting (Venice, 16 December 2006) and the Venice Commission.

    The Venice Commission Code is mentioned in the concise 500 word Supreme Court ruling in the McCrystal case, which is here: http://supremecourt.ie/Judgments.nsf...8?OpenDocument.

    4. The McKenna principles may be found in the several judgments in that case. These principles, which are not in dispute, are consistent with standards recognised both nationally and internationally for a Referendum process, such as the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Code for Good Practice on Referendums, adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 19th Meeting (Venice, 16 December, 2006) and the Venice Commission at its 70th Plenary Session (Venice, 16 – 17 March, 2007).
    We will face other proposals for change. 70 percent of the electorate feeling so alienated from the process that they abstain from voting is neither inevitable nor healthy.

    We might try a better approach next time. The blueprint is there. Instead of following it, successive governments have been caught trying to subvert it.
    Last edited by He3; 11th November 2012 at 07:17 PM.
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member Mountaintop's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Caught between the moon and New York City
    Posts
    1,256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Thought 'run' was missing an 'i' in the thread title....then I realised the Government hadn't written it.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountaintop View Post
    Thought 'run' was missing an 'i' in the thread title....then I realised the Government hadn't written it.
    We have an unbeatable record in ruining referendums all right.

    It need not continue.
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    1. Give every household in the country a copy of the Constitution.
    2. Only amend if it is necessary (eg legislate for marriage equality first).
    3. Fund both sides equally
    4. Referendum commission should articulate reasons to vote yes and no
    5. Hold the referendum on a Friday (highlighting that supplemental registration can occur up to 15 days before the poll).
    6. Platitudes by politicians should be avoided.
    7. Scaremongering should be corrected by referendum commission.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    4,504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    try start with electing a government who know their ars.e from their elbow...

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Con Gallagher View Post
    1. Give every household in the country a copy of the Constitution.
    2. Only amend if it is necessary (eg legislate for marriage equality first).
    3. Fund both sides equally
    4. Referendum commission should articulate reasons to vote yes and no
    5. Hold the referendum on a Friday (highlighting that supplemental registration can occur up to 15 days before the poll).
    6. Platitudes by politicians should be avoided.
    7. Scaremongering should be corrected by referendum commission.
    Those are all good proposals. Number 6 will be ignored.

    The Referendum Commission should be given a minimum three month lead in time.
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member Half Nelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    21,552
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    It's pointless laying down laws and rules for the conduct of referendums when governments can and do breach those rules, even after voting has begun.
    We know that FG&Lab Governments are not worried about breaching SC orders because they have done so on two or more occasions.

    The missing factor is 'accountability'.
    Misappropriation or theft of exchequer funds should be a criminal offence and we have a constitutional office that is charged with guarding those funds but so far that office seems to be far more concerned with tackling those without power.
    The latest crackdown began after the Comptroller and Auditor General warned "more frequent" fraud surveys were necessary
    .

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,241
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Con Gallagher View Post
    4. Referendum commission should articulate reasons to vote yes and no
    7. Scaremongering should be corrected by referendum commission.
    What would be nice would be if the Referendum Commission would answer fact based questions.

    Answers to those questions could then be considered if the SC every has to make decisions on the amendment. Not binding, but if there was ambiguity, then weight could be given to how the people were advised.

    Ofc, it creates incentives to ask questions in a way that the truth is misleading.

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Has any Government Minister shown any sign in public of having read the Venice Commission document?

    Afaik the angry political party reaction from the usual suspects has made no mention of that internationally agreed set of standards - which I think Ireland is signed up to.
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member sondagefaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    15,105
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    There's been a proposal on twitter also that the Referendum Commission act as a fact-checker for the claims made by both sides. I think it has done that to a very limited extent, but it wouldn't be a bad idea to make that an explicit part of its remit. It would also be useful if the media were then obliged to ensure that the Referendum Commission's findings were voiced everytime a claim was made by either side.

    For example, if somebody on one side made a claim during a TV debate, which the Referendum Commission had found to be false, then the moderator would have to intervene and state clearly that the Referendum Commmission had found this claim to be false.

    Hopefully, it would quickly remove the more outlandish claims that are made during campaigns.
    Mark Murray.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •