Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 33 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 326

Thread: Loose Change - Final Cut (9/11)

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member SirCharles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    15,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Question Loose Change - Final Cut (9/11)

    I know it is not the latest movie, but the public dispute is still going on.

    Loose Change - Final Cut

    What do you guys think?

    Was it a conspiracy? Was 9/11 an inside job?

    The most interesting question for me is:
    How was it possible that building no. 7 - which was unharmed by air strike - which had shortly before been refurbished, and many storeys had been made bullet and fire proof - which burnt mostly on one side - which had the most of evidence about vanished money and dodgy contracts - collapsed in a same freefall as the Twin Towers into its own ditch like in a very successful controlled demolission?
    P.ie has become a melting pot for fascists and outlandish trolls. Since I got punished for reporting the latter I'm no more posting on this forum. Who owns politics.ie?

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member zippo222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Co. Wexford
    Posts
    3,780
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    They've more room over on Boards.ie than here, for this sort of guff.

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zippo222 View Post

    They've more room over on Boards.ie than here, for this sort of guff.
    You are too polite.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member Oreo Livermore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    754
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Excellent post Sir Charles but there is a huge thread on this already

  5. #5

    Default

    Thanks Sir Charles. Haven't seen the Final Cut yet. Did you see Jason's documentary "Invisible Empire" yet?
    “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.” - Friedrich A. Hayek

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oreo Livermore View Post
    Excellent post Sir Charles but there is a huge thread on this already
    But it would be nice to have a clean one without Conor the Bold contaminating it, despite the fact he converted a lot of posters on the other thread to the 9/11 truth movement with his vile behaviour.
    “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.” - Friedrich A. Hayek

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    i just cant see it as being an inside job
    there are discrepancies but there always are

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saoirsegodeo32 View Post
    i just cant see it as being an inside job
    there are discrepancies but there always are
    Thats what Occam's Razor is for. The official line of events is for the want of a better word, impossible.
    “The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.” - Friedrich A. Hayek

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Oreo Livermore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    754
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saoirsegodeo32 View Post
    i just cant see it as being an inside job
    there are discrepancies but there always are
    Most can't.

    Building 7 was 47 stories high. Even if the first 30 stories crumbled it still would not collapse the top 17. There was no force acting on them until the impact forces on collapse. These while great would not crumble a steel skeleton

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    GCHQ - Cheltenham
    Posts
    3,361
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SirCharles View Post
    I know it is not the latest movie, but the public dispute is still going on.

    Loose Change - Final Cut

    What do you guys think?

    Was it a conspiracy? Was 9/11 an inside job?
    Was it a conspiracy? Yes.

    Was it an inside job? No.

    The most interesting question for me is:
    How was it possible that building no. 7 - which was unharmed by air strike
    Which was unharmed by an Airliner, but had been standing in the path of thousands of tonnes of burning debris from the North Tower collapsing?

    - which had shortly before been refurbished, and many storeys had been made bullet and fire proof -
    1. Bulletproof stops a collapsing building how?
    2. All buildings like that should be to one extent or another 'fire proof' for a given duration of time.

    which burnt mostly on one side
    I suppose this is a step up from not being on fire at all.

    which had the most of evidence about vanished money and dodgy contracts -
    Surely a fire would be good enough? Or does it require an entire building to be collapsed?

    collapsed in a same freefall as the Twin Towers into its own ditch like in a very successful controlled demolission?
    This is quite patently untrue. 7 WTC collapsed very differently to 1 & 2 WTC.

    But questions that must be asked - if 7 WTC was a controlled demolition - does this mean that 1 & 2 WTC were controlled demolitions?

    In short this has been covered in another thread.

Page 1 of 33 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •