Is it really fair that sdcc dont have to have a properly regulated criteria for social housing? I know Ivana Bacik brought this up in the senate last year, but somehow they seem to be able continue to "cherry pick" allocations.
I have a real bee in my bonnet about this, as a mother of two Autistic chidren who has been on the list for 6 years, with no forseeable end in sight. They have been collating their 2010 list since last November???????????
The medical criteria is a joke also. An un-named General practitioner (not a specialist!) comes in once a month, looks at any medical information submitted, then without asking you to attend for an examination, or referral to specialist in required medical field, he/she informs the allocation board, that the application is accepted or denied. So far i have been turned down 4 times,With NO explaination, now i dont know how disabled you have to be but im guessing something is rotten in this particular council.
I have no recourse left as they do not accept
a) social workers reccomendations
b) Input, letters ect from T.D.s Because of the Work to rule!!!
Jesus the excuses go on and on, in a country that is heaving with empty properties these clowns are up to something sinister in my opinion. I know i am not alone in this mire, so im hoping someone might have experience of this with sdcc or any other council.
I am a Divorced woman who is a full time carer for my children and i wish i did not have to depend on the social housing scheme, but going out to work is impossible unfortunately for me in my situation.