Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Confirmed: global warming zealots hate people

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member rhonda15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    under the sun
    Posts
    3,544
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Confirmed: global warming zealots hate people

    Iíve always suspected this. There can be only one logical conclusion to the anthropogenic global warming campaign: eliminate human beings. Or, at least, reduce to a minimum their number on the planet.

    Have you had the sneaking suspicion that climate change activists were seeking to suppress every possible life-enhancing human activity from a long hot bath to a long-haul flight to an exotic destination? Have you ever had the sense that they would actually prefer it if you just ceased to occupy space on the earth, using up Ė as you do Ė its precious resources to facilitate your own pestilential selfish existence? That, if they could, they would at least manage to deter you from reproducing? Well, here it is: this report from the LSE says it all.

    Confirmed: global warming zealots hate people – Telegraph Blogs


    'Contraception cheapest way to combat climate change'
    Contraception is almost five times cheaper as a means of preventing climate change than conventional green technologies, according to research by the London School of Economics.

    'Contraception cheapest way to combat climate change' - Telegraph

    No surprise the George Soros funded and supported uber-elitest London School of Economics authored this study.
    "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'' ~ J. Edgar Hoover http://tiny.cc/b2jo9

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55,716
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    How do you conclude that sensible population control equates to hating people?

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member rhonda15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    under the sun
    Posts
    3,544
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    How do you conclude that sensible population control equates to hating people?
    because it is well known that many of these guys are eugenicists and love China's population policy and would like to see it introduced everywhere. You think they're gonna stop there?
    "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.'' ~ J. Edgar Hoover http://tiny.cc/b2jo9

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    55,716
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhonda15 View Post
    because it is well known that many of these guys are eugenicists and love China's population policy and would like to see it introduced everywhere. You think they're gonna stop there?
    It's well known that the planet is heading for serious over-population and we are the only species doing the over-populating. We need to learn that simple lesson and start doing something about it - instead of attacking the messengers

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member farnaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Swords
    Posts
    1,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhonda15 View Post
    Iíve always suspected this. There can be only one logical conclusion to the anthropogenic global warming campaign: eliminate human beings. Or, at least, reduce to a minimum their number on the planet.

    Have you had the sneaking suspicion that climate change activists were seeking to suppress every possible life-enhancing human activity from a long hot bath to a long-haul flight to an exotic destination?
    On the contrary, a reduced global population would actually increase the perception of each individual's value and the potential for each individual to do those life-affirming things without destroying the basis of all aspects of human life as climate change may threaten. I've always preferred being one 5 millionth of the Irish nation compared with less than one billionth of the Chinese nation, for example. Environmentalists uniformly believe that current global population growth is unsustainable or rather downright destructive, and provided population reduction is not coercive it is a desireable outcome. What's wrong with increasing sexual education, contraception, family planning? You might find some enviro-nutjobs who believe in less co-operative methods of population reduction but you can lump those with genocidal or fundamentalist fanatics and move on (quickly).

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member Malboury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by farnaby View Post
    On the contrary, a reduced global population would actually increase the perception of each individual's value and the potential for each individual to do those life-affirming things without destroying the basis of all aspects of human life as climate change may threaten. I've always preferred being one 5 millionth of the Irish nation compared with less than one billionth of the Chinese nation, for example. Environmentalists uniformly believe that current global population growth is unsustainable or rather downright destructive, and provided population reduction is not coercive it is a desireable outcome. What's wrong with increasing sexual education, contraception, family planning? You might find some enviro-nutjobs who believe in less co-operative methods of population reduction but you can lump those with genocidal or fundamentalist fanatics and move on (quickly).
    All cogent points covered there. Good post.

    Rhonda, out of interest, how many humans do you want to see on Earth? Surely there must be an upper limit to how many you want living here? Personally, I think 12 billion or so's probably a good upper limit, though we should probably cut back until we have the infrastructure and resources to support them.

    Now if you want to start moving people off planet, I'm all for that. A Solar system of 30 billion humans would be fine; it just when we all cluster into one limited gravity well that the problems start. ;-)

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member evercloserunion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Some of the stuff on this website lately is serious cack.
    To live honestly, to hurt no one, to give every one his due.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member owedtojoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NW of Dublin - Co. Meath
    Posts
    43,105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    If I want to read what the Daily Telegraph is saying about global warming, I will buy the newspaper.

    However, I know that newspaper generally publishes only lies and half-truths on that topic, like the screed of that arch-idiot James Delingpole.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...change-denial#

    So if someone is so lame-ass and stuck for subject matter as to use the Telegraph as a starting point for a discussion, then count me out. I have better things to do.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    12,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Jaysus, not another paranoid thread by Rhonda15 based on something in a rapid right wing UK newspaper.

    Maybe we need a forum called "the Bin" for the endless conspiracy theory diarrhoea Rhonda and others come out with!
    "In [Ireland] a wife is regarded as a chattel, just as a thoroughbred mare or cow." Mr Justice Butler in the Irish courts. 'Traditional Marriage' in the 1970s.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bandit Country
    Posts
    197
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Leaving all the ad hominum rubbish aside, there is an important question here- if it is the case that population reduction will combat climate change, should this be done by coercive means? How far can one legitimately go to control population?
    If once the people become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions.

    Thomas Jefferson

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •