Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 18 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 173

Thread: 1641 Rebellion whats the truth

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member An Gilladaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gort Na Cloca Mora
    Posts
    4,312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default 1641 Rebellion whats the truth

    A grant of £334,000 has being given to University language experts to look over thousands accounts following the 1641 rebellion to see what was propaganda and what was fact


    BBC News - 1641 massacre accounts examined

    http://1641.eneclann.ie/viewdepositi...pages=2&page=2
    Last edited by An Gilladaker; 4th March 2010 at 06:35 PM.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member cb1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Here is an interview from NEAR90FM with Dr. Micheál Ó Siocrú of TCD about the 1641 Rebellion.

    Internet Archive: Free Download: Interview with Dr. Micheal O'Siochru

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member former wesleyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    25,464
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    To be debated on DRIVETIME now.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member kerdasi amaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    M.O. BÁC
    Posts
    4,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Could paid agent provocateurs have been used to incite events? If so, who would benefit?
    Last edited by kerdasi amaq; 4th March 2010 at 09:09 PM.
    We have got as much as we are going to get out of Europe; it is, now, time to leave!
    EUROPA CONVENTUS DELENDA EST!...Whistle out the marching tune.....27

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Default Genocide?

    Now, now we’ll teach the shameless Scot to purge his thieving maw,
    Now, now the Court will fall to pray, for Justice is the Law,
    Now shall the Undertaker square, for once, his loose accounts,
    We’ll strike, brave boys, a fair amount from all his false amounts.

    Come, trample down their robber rule, and smite its venal spawn,
    Their foreign laws, their foreign church, their ermine and their lawn,
    With all the specious fry of fraud that robbed us of our own;
    And plant our ancient laws again, beneath our lineal throne.


    These verses are in the voice of a 1641 Ulster Catholic rebel, speaking after a massacre of 3000 (it is claimed) uninvolved and innocent Catholic men, women and children at Islandmagee, near Larne, Co. Antrim, and while the 1641 rebels’ retaliatory massacre of Protestants was in progress. Catholic clerics sheltered Protestants to protect them from rebel vengeance. The speaker continues:

    Pity! No, no, you dare not, Priest – not you, our Father, dare
    Preach to us now that Godless creed – the murderer’s blood to spare;
    To spare his blood, while tombless still our slaughtered kin implore
    “Graves and revenge” from Guibin-Cliffs and Carraic’s bloody shore!

    They banned our faith, they banned our lives, they trod us into earth,
    Until our very patience stirred their bitter hearts to mirth;
    Even this great flame which wraps them now, not we, but they, have bred,
    Yes, this is their own work, and now THEIR WORK BE ON THEIR HEAD.

    An Orange song commemorates this event, commemorates Belfast Lough “running red with Papist blood” at Carrickfergus. The poem above, called “The Muster of the North”, was written by Charles Gavan Duffy, a future Member of Parliament at Westminster, and future Premier of the State of Victoria in Australia..

    In stating the rebel case two centuries after the 1641 events, “Young Ireland” leader Duffy was not advocating a replay of 1641. He was explaining that genocide was what was afoot. It’s just that the British settler movement was much better at it than anybody else over the centuries.

    Cyril Falls (The Birth of Ulster, 1936) wrote a history of the Plantation from a pro-Planter perspective. He said that he could not understand why the native Irish regarded Cromwell as the greatest enemy, as Sir Arthur Chichester committed infinitely worse atrocities in the early 1600’s, clearing the way for the settlers. Cyril Falls acknowledged that the natives suffered. He compared the Ulster indigenous to the American Indians, his position being, in effect, that “you can’t make an omelette [the Plantation] without breaking eggs”.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member An Gilladaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gort Na Cloca Mora
    Posts
    4,312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kerdasi amaq View Post
    Could paid agent provocateurs have been used to incite events? If so, who would benefit?

    Perhaps its been done to undermine the groups that peddle the massacre stories


    DEMOCRACY AND POLITICS

  7. #7

    Default

    Two forregin aul monarchs, in battle did join,
    each wanting his head, on the back of our coins,
    if the irish had sense we'd of drowned both in the Boyne,
    And Partition thrown into the ocean!

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    These verses are in the voice of a 1641 Ulster Catholic rebel, speaking after a massacre of 3000 (it is claimed) uninvolved and innocent Catholic men, women and children at Islandmagee, near Larne, Co. Antrim, and while the 1641 rebels’ retaliatory massacre of Protestants was in progress. Catholic clerics sheltered Protestants to protect them from rebel vengeance. The speaker continues:
    Indeed, there had been dozens of massacres on this scale in Ireland from around 1550-1660 and the massacres in Ireland (but especially in Ulster) against Catholics continued throughout the duration of this war in Ireland, just as they had preceded it. Eoghan Roe O'Neill went on to hang some of those involved in 1641, was this a political move - to secure a more easier alliance with others in Ireland? Maybe a gesture motivated by a fear of planter 'retaliations' in Ulster (not wanting to see ethnic bloodshed continue on the scale it was at - he himself remarked on the magnitude of the suffering in Ulster when he landed in Ireland)?

    Cyril Falls (The Birth of Ulster, 1936) wrote a history of the Plantation from a pro-Planter perspective. He said that he could not understand why the native Irish regarded Cromwell as the greatest enemy, as Sir Arthur Chichester committed infinitely worse atrocities in the early 1600’s, clearing the way for the settlers. Cyril Falls acknowledged that the natives suffered. He compared the Ulster indigenous to the American Indians, his position being, in effect, that “you can’t make an omelette [the Plantation] without breaking eggs”.
    He has a point in a sense, Elisabeth's privateers and those of the other Tudor rulers were more animalistic in the level of violence they brought - slaughtering people and sticking their heads on pikes, burning Catholics alive and so forth without hesitation, Cromwell's crimes (though they did involve savagery and massacres too) often took the form of policies and evils codified in 'law', it was different measures for different times - the Tudors found and intact Gaelic civilisation which they felt they had to unmake using extreme violence, Cromwell had already conquered a country already largely controlled by forces with loyalty to Britain (the Confederation of Kilkenny was not exactly an independence movement) so the country had already been softened enough that the laws and policies could just be changed and the screws turned that way.

    Perhaps its been done to undermine the groups that peddle the massacre stories
    The site states that the numbers of dead and the severity of the atrocities was actually multiplied by pamphleteers at the time into hundreds of thousands to give Cromwell in England the propaganda he needed to justify the severity of the destruction he wrought when he invaded.. this is not in dispute, just the depositions that were received, so i think this project is merely to see if it was exaggerated closer to the source too.

    The British unified the Scots and the English in spirit through mutual animosity towards the Irish Catholic, this was part of the reason why anti-Catholic sentiment had for centuries been carefully nurtured in Britain - beyond all reason (~not something so trivial and petty as hatred or bigotry but a best laid plan~), Protestantism was the main glue holding England, Scotland, Wales and the Pro-British element in Ireland together. The idea of the massacre of Scots in the North and the perceived 'avenging' of this by the English warlord must have played a significant role in that in the 17thC, Unifying Scotland to England was always a more important goal for Westminster as they shared the same island and so it gave them security to be one land united, if you ask me this is the real reason why James I preferred that Scots be used to plant Ireland (he was also the first unified Anglo-Scottish King, plans to achieve unification had been long in planning - going back to the early 16thC), he knew the divisions that could be exploited between Irish and Scottish people and how this would benefit England and their dream of British unification, consider that only 3 centuries earlier Scotland in an alliance with France (then England's enemy) had even landed troops in Ireland in alliance with the Gael to expel the English presence. James had the most diabolical long term plans, in the end the Stuarts were only tools though and the line was thrown away when it had served it's purpose.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member Casualbets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,636
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I'm of the opinion that the massacres that did occur were the result of local groups taking the opportunity to exact vengeance in an uprising that due to its geographical distribution and the fact that its original leaders weren't (as far as I know) militarily trained had at the first fairly little central co-ordination and didn't until owen roe o'neill joined them. I don't believe it was a policy of the leaders per se. I'll admit a smidgin of personal interest as I'm descended from Phelim O'Neill.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Casualbets View Post
    I'm of the opinion that the massacres that did occur were the result of local groups taking the opportunity to exact vengeance in an uprising that due to its geographical distribution and the fact that its original leaders weren't (as far as I know) militarily trained had at the first fairly little central co-ordination and didn't until owen roe o'neill joined them. I don't believe it was a policy of the leaders per se. I'll admit a smidgin of personal interest as I'm descended from Phelim O'Neill.
    you might like this then

    Welcome to The Association of O'Neill Clan Website

    me too

Page 1 of 18 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •