Follow @PoliticsIE
 
 
 
Page 1 of 32 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 311

Thread: Little Catholic Belgium was worse than the Nazis

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Aontas Sóvéideach na hÉireann
    Posts
    13,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Little Catholic Belgium was worse than the Nazis

    As Vincent Brown pointed out in last weeks Sunday Business Post, John Redmond sent thousands of Irish men to their deaths to defend one of the worst criminal regimes in the history of the world. King Leopold 2 of Belgium turned the whole of the Congo region - an area as big as all Europe to Moscow, into one massive death camp. In the craze for rubber the Belgians would go into an African village, kidnap the women and force the men to go out serching for rubber before they could get their loved ones back. While in captivity the Belgian soldiers would gang rape the pretty young girls. Belgian soldiers forced African young men to kill or rape their own mothers and sisters. Villages which refused to co-operate were simply exterminated as a lesson to other villages. The black soldiers who were issued ammunition where forced to return one human hand as evidence that they used the bullets on killing Africans and not hunting game. Often, the soldiers would simply cut a hand off living people to make up for bullets. Its estimated that the Belgian terror took ten million lives. This is only a brief example of the catalog of horror. Joseph Conrad is thought to have based his Kurtz character on a head hunting Belgian officer called Léon Rom in the Congo. He liked to decorate his gardens with the heads of his African victims. Adam Hochschild fills over 300 pages of his book "King Leopold's Ghost" with a catalog of horror from the Belgian Congo.

    All this was known, thanks to the work of Roger Casement, among others, at the time that John Redmond was peddling the lie that Irish people should give their lives to defend "Little Catholic Belgium." How sick that so many Irish peole died to defend what could never be defended. And how sick that some today try to present their wasted lives as something we should be proud of. The Irish soldiers of the British Army were victims of Imperialism, just as much as those ten million Africans butchered by Leopold 2 and his henchmen.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    776
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Did Redmond want Belgium free so that it could continue to rule the Congo?

    Did Irishmen join the British Army because they wanted the people of the Congo to suffer?

    Did the actions of the Belgian government in the Congo vitiate the right of the people of Belgium to self-determination?

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Aontas Sóvéideach na hÉireann
    Posts
    13,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinage
    Did Redmond want Belgium free so that it could continue to rule the Congo?

    Did Irishmen join the British Army because they wanted the people of the Congo to suffer?

    Did the actions of the Belgian government in the Congo vitiate the right of the people of Belgium to self-determination?

    Would the Germans have treated the people of the Congo better or worse had they won the war and taken over Belgium's colonies?
    Would you give your life to defend such horror?

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Member Catalpa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    10,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinage
    Did Redmond want Belgium free so that it could continue to rule the Congo?

    Did Irishmen join the British Army because they wanted the people of the Congo to suffer?

    Did the actions of the Belgian government in the Congo vitiate the right of the people of Belgium to self-determination?

    Would the Germans have treated the people of the Congo better or worse had they won the war and taken over Belgium's colonies?
    Did not the 2nd Reich rule over the neighbouring States of Rwanda and Burundi + Tanganiyka prior to WWI ?

    I don't know how they fared in the first two but they managed to raise an effective force of locally recruited Askaris in the latter who proved to brave and loyal fighters on the side of Germany.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Szczecin, Poland
    Posts
    435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Re: Little Catholic Belgium was worse than the Nazis

    Quote Originally Posted by Cael
    Belgian soldiers forced African young men to kill or rape their own mothers and sisters.
    Can you provide a rational explanation as to why they would have done this :

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member farnaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Swords
    Posts
    1,913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Leopold II ruled the Congo as a personal kingdom, not on behalf of the Belgian people. He died in 1909, unpopular/detested, after the horrors you mention were carried out, a year after this kingdom was taken from him by the Belgian parliament, and 5 years before WWI.

    So Irish soldiers were not defending that particular despicable regime, nor are the Belgian people as a whole to be condemned as nazis. None of which denies the fact WWI was a war of imperialist nations, thus all tainted with evil from our perspective - but to link John Redmond to tolerating genocide in the Congo is stretching it.
    I stand with two thousand years of darkness and bafflement and hunger behind me... and I couldn't give a ha'penny jizz for your internet-assembled philosophy. Evil Vicar

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Aontas Sóvéideach na hÉireann
    Posts
    13,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Re: Little Catholic Belgium was worse than the Nazis

    Quote Originally Posted by pogo
    Quote Originally Posted by Cael
    Belgian soldiers forced African young men to kill or rape their own mothers and sisters.
    Can you provide a rational explanation as to why they would have done this :
    No I cant. I think when people become so steeped in horror as the Belgians became in the Congo, then horror becomes a kind of pornography - each time you need something more horrific than the last.

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Member Munion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Dublin West
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Cael one man does not represent a country. The Belgians hated Leopold II.

    The Congo was that mad mans own private playground, a sick & twisted one at that.

    Lizzy Windsor might be into a bit of kinky leather fetishism but that doesn't mean the entire population of the UK is into S&M!
    Freedom, Tolerance & Equality of Opportunity

    Economic Left/Right: -1.25
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Aontas Sóvéideach na hÉireann
    Posts
    13,343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by farnaby
    Leopold II ruled the Congo as a personal kingdom, not on behalf of the Belgian people. He died in 1909, unpopular/detested, after the horrors you mention were carried out, a year after this kingdom was taken from him by the Belgian parliament, and 5 years before WWI.

    So Irish soldiers were not defending that particular despicable regime, nor are the Belgian people as a whole to be condemned as nazis. None of which denies the fact WWI was a war of imperialist nations, thus all tainted with evil from our perspective - but to link John Redmond to tolerating genocide in the Congo is stretching it.
    And the Belgians were still forcing villagers to collect rubber in 1948. It was a huge intrest free loan from the Belgian government which made Leopold's reign of terror possible in the first place. Leopold spent his ill gotten gains on blood drenched buildings and monuments littered all over Belgium. Many Belgian companies and individuals made their fortunes on African tears and blood. Im not saying that all Belgian individuals were murderers and torturers - but the Belgian state was up to its neck in the blood and severed limbs.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by badinage
    Would the Germans have treated the people of the Congo better or worse had they won the war and taken over Belgium's colonies?
    Who knows? Did anyone expect Hitler to emerge?

    Redmonds intentions and the implications of them, in this regard, were as blind and inward looking as the rest of the 'World of Empire' that was Europe, as were most around the entire sick WWI milieau.

    So while its incongrous its not unsurprising that the link to the Congo -or any of the other participants sick little adventures in hidden hot climates- failed to be obvious at the time. Afterall Casement probably had no Lancet...

    It is obvious now of course in the periods pro-war recruitment advertising, and it's worth a mention by Browne as there's many modern day historians who want to wish away the down sides of empire.

    Makes me think...I wonder what people will think of games such 'America’s Army' when the American empire goes the way of the Belgians?


    Vincent Browne had an article on Casement and the Congo during the summer.
    Another flawed brave hero

    This reminds me of a truly harrowing documentary on what went on in the Congo, repeated on BBC4 recently titled "White King, Red Rubber, Black Death"*. I think it said the estimate of deaths could be as high as 30 million.
    It's about time a 'Shindlers List' equivalent was made about this. The effects must ripple through to the present day.

    *
    King Leopold's legacy of DR Congo violence
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3516965.stm

    "White King, Red Rubber, Black Death"
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0404551/

Page 1 of 32 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •