Why are the Democrats in general and President Obama in particular so opposed to tort reform? This is an area that has been associated with healthcare costs for a long time. Medical professionals are plagued with astronomically high premiums because of lawsuits encouraged by lawyers. It seems as if the Democrats are overly protective of the attorneys who are major contributers to their coffers. When a law professor is the head of your party it becomes more complicated. It is estimated, by the way, that tort reform would result in a saving of $54 in deficit spending and significantly more in overall savings. The savings would not have been huge in comparison the the whole plan but would have saved families at least a thousand dollars. Now that healthcare looks as if it will be shelved it is time to emphasize that tort reform must not be shelved with it.

It probably because the poor Medical professionals (who in reality are mostly very wealthy and well insured) would to reform it so that even if they committed gross misconduct you still could not get a penny in comparison!!!!!!

Well, medical professionals have the highest premiums pretty much everywhere. They deal in life and death. However, I am not against the idea. What are the proposals?

__________________
"......... we must sometimes listen to those who, consumed with zeal, have scant judgment or balance. To such ones the modern world is nothing but betrayal and ruin.........We feel bound to disagree with these prophets of doom who are forever forecasting calamity -- as though the world's end were imminent."

Hate to disappoint you but medical professionals in the US are not phenomeonally wealthy. In fact they are paid a pittance compared to our Consultants and unlike our Consultants there are fewer opportunities to rise to the senior most levels. And they don't get to these levels anywhere as soon as our doctors do.

The few who do are well-rewarded, but being a doctor in the US is no light burden.

__________________
Doo-DAH! Doo-DAH! (Foghorn J. Leghorn)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

There you are wrong. Some areas are undeserved by professionals. People are no longer willing to work in OBGYN for example because of the high instances of malpractice suits. General practice has also been hit. Most people who do remain in this area are earning nowhere near what people think. It is harder to get insurance if you are an OBGYN doc than if you are the Archdiocese of Dublin.

Much of the legal stuff is Greek to me. It is hard to find anything concrete and what I do find relates to years ago (Tort Reform). It will be on the agenda as Obama goes to Republicans to negotiate a revised healthcare bill.

From what I know regarding OBGYN if there is a problem and you are the Doctor "it is your fault" irrespective of whether it is or not. There is always someone to blame, it's just a matter of making sure it is the person who can pay out the most money!

__________________
Doo-DAH! Doo-DAH! (Foghorn J. Leghorn)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Exactly, herself used to work in OBGYN but no longer does. Everyone wants and expects a perfect baby if there are complications (and no one wishes for that, then it is the doctor's fault and the lawyers are only too willing to make them pay while they get their percentage.

Ok maybe i was wrong about the wealthy bit however the rest still stands Medical professionals (who in reality are well insured) want to reform it so that even if they committed gross misconduct you still could not get a penny in comparison and they have lobbist out there now trying to make it a reality!!!!!!

More of this "you are either with us or against us" totalitarian nonsense.

Yet another proof of the reality that the Republicrats are shills for the military industrial complex (Eisenhower's words)

Obama Administration: Critics Are Aiding Al Qaeda