Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Regional Discussion > Northern Ireland

Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Politics.ie but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Joining Politics.ie is completely free. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

The beginning of the end of the GFA

This is a discussion on The beginning of the end of the GFA within the Northern Ireland forums, part of the Regional Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by IrishConservative okay i am a little off the beaten track here but clearly statements like, "All people ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Tiernanator's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishConservative View Post
okay i am a little off the beaten track here but clearly statements like,

"All people should be entitled to full social, economic and cultural equality." Mary Lou McDonald (Sinn Féin Vice President)

are as much a reason for the people of northern ireland to be disenchanted with local politics. And considering the majority of ireland really dont care for a untied ireland, along with the continuing realisation that the north would only destroy what sh*ty economy we have left in ireland, is it not surprising people would be less interested in all the boll*x that seems to flow out of the north.
Not helpful and a trifle predictable IrishConservative. Do you think we haven't heard this type of boll*x before.
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #62 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Pat Mc Larnon's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Belfast
Posts: 1,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth.ie View Post
This is a failure of the negotiating teams in the All Party Talks.
A referendum based on the majority of a statelet you don't even recognise is only shelving the problem for another day. The referendum should go ahead with or without British consent. They should be persuaded to take part, and International pressure should be laid,Republicans for their part should cease violence to accomodate a peaceful referendum, but if they refuse to take part they will be denying democracy to the vast majority of the Irish people.
Partition affects both sides of the border. Solutions to partition must involve both sides of the border. The Unionist minority cannot stop democratic constitutional change. Nationalist failure to negotiate, and British failure to lay a strong hand on Unionists condemned us all to decades more of the Status Quo.

The very essence of 'all party talks' is that other parties do have a say in what can and cannot be discussed. The British being the current administrators for that part of Ireland thus have the final say in what can feasibly be discussed. Their power relative to that of Irish Republicans makes that an unfortunate truth.

We will all agree on the artifical democratic majority given to unionists at partition but that is a legacy that we have to deal with in the here and now and it is a legacy that no Britsh government is going to turn its' back on. The IRA campaign post 1969 is testament to that.

The idea that we can hold a referendum on this island without the full co-operation of the British with some, as of yet, ungarnered International pressure is pie in the sky stuff.

The staus quo need not be a reality if sufficient political pressure is applied. The 6 counties is unrecognisable from what it once was and I certainly believe more changes can be made through the current political process, laboured and slow moving though that may be. I do have faith in republican policies (throughout all parties) to the extent that enough of those who currently favour Westminster rule can be persuaded to the merits of a UI.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Default

Right the country cant afford to run the 26th counties let alone adding on another 6.

We will be a united ireland eventually.Its inevitable.But at a time when we as one people decide not an the whim of 300 extremists.The only difference between RIRA and the Taliban is their religion.Both are terrorists.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tír Eoghain
Posts: 1,559
Default

A leading Sinn Féin member told me, at the time of the GFA, that you could barely put a hair between the decision to sign up or not to sign up... it was so close.

The British and the DUP have been swinging and dangling and laughing on that hair for 10 years. Like the Anglo-Irish Agreement, the GFA is getting dustier and dustier... it has failed to deliver the hopes for change the nationalist community felt at the time. At some point, Sinn Féin will feel this in elections... but not yet.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dún na nGall
Posts: 1,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seánod View Post
A leading Sinn Féin member told me, at the time of the GFA, that you could barely put a hair between the decision to sign up or not to sign up... it was so close.

The British and the DUP have been swinging and dangling and laughing on that hair for 10 years. Like the Anglo-Irish Agreement, the GFA is getting dustier and dustier... it has failed to deliver the hopes for change the nationalist community felt at the time. At some point, Sinn Féin will feel this in elections... but not yet.

There is the problem. The Nationalist community hasn't gotten anything from this agreement or since. Sure there is McG in Stormont and that is all.
__________________
"I don't know whether the world is run by smart men who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain

Remember the Drumboe Martyrs -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
mutley's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Mc Larnon View Post
The very essence of 'all party talks' is that other parties do have a say in what can and cannot be discussed. The British being the current administrators for that part of Ireland thus have the final say in what can feasibly be discussed. Their power relative to that of Irish Republicans makes that an unfortunate truth.

We will all agree on the artifical democratic majority given to unionists at partition but that is a legacy that we have to deal with in the here and now and it is a legacy that no Britsh government is going to turn its' back on. The IRA campaign post 1969 is testament to that.

The idea that we can hold a referendum on this island without the full co-operation of the British with some, as of yet, ungarnered International pressure is pie in the sky stuff.

The staus quo need not be a reality if sufficient political pressure is applied. The 6 counties is unrecognisable from what it once was and I certainly believe more changes can be made through the current political process, laboured and slow moving though that may be. I do have faith in republican policies (throughout all parties) to the extent that enough of those who currently favour Westminster rule can be persuaded to the merits of a UI.
Who needs to apply the political pressure - if its Sinn Fein you aren't applying enough, If its the brits - the chances of that will be even less when the tories get into power
And I haven't seen any evidence of this persuasion to the pro westminster group - talk is cheap, and the DUP are running rings round Sinn Fein
__________________
...
"Our culture is so individualistic that even the word 'we' is spelt with two I's"

LOL

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


For Ball, not Man playing

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiernanator View Post
It is very hard at the moment being a republican who rejects violence but nevertheless agrees with much of the analysis of people like Truth.ie and Amach na Casca. While I accept the wishes of the people and support the GFA as an imperfect stopgap I do concede that those republicans that reject it have quite a sound historical analysis to back their claims.

However I just don't know how the can even think about supporting another armed campaign. It won't work. After 9/11 the governments of the west especially are committed to suppressing what the call "terror". Any dissent will be quashed not only by the reactionary forces in Ireland and the UK but worldwide. Peaceful opposition to the GFA is not only justifiable but very understandable. A return to the hell that we have come from will not be permitted by either the nationalist/republican people or indeed the reactionaries/state forces. Please think again if you are supporting armed struggle or trying to get other people to support it.
Thats a fair and reasonable assessment. Maybe Factual will take note and learn theres more to being a party hack (if he actually is one, and not some sort of wind up) than blindlingly agreeing with every single detail and word coming out of the party leaderships mouths, and all aspects of every agreement ever struck since the beginning of time.

Personally I believe the way forward is for SF to engage with dissidents and take on board some of their concerns as much as they can. This would go a long way towards diffusing the tensions that are currently built up. Ignoring all of the dissidents concerns, and any more McGuinness style 'traitor' comments uttered will be extremely counterproductive and will only serve to make the intra republican rift even wider.
__________________
“As well might you leave the fairies to plough your land or the idle winds to sow it, as sit down and wait for freedom.” - Thomas Davis
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Pat Mc Larnon's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Belfast
Posts: 1,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mutley View Post
Who needs to apply the political pressure - if its Sinn Fein you aren't applying enough, If its the brits - the chances of that will be even less when the tories get into power
And I haven't seen any evidence of this persuasion to the pro westminster group - talk is cheap, and the DUP are running rings round Sinn Fein
The political pressure needs to be applied by all those parties who believe in a UI. In theory at least this applies to all the parties in the 26 counties. As it is they have shown unwillingness to get involved in the UI debate to any great extent. in that regard it is indeed left to SF. That being the case is it not more prudent to support the efforts of the party rather than be the hurler in the ditch with nothing realisitc to offer?
SF has a UI as the central core of party strategy, thus it is considerably more than cheap talk.
You are of course entitled to your opinion on the DUP.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
mutley's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Mc Larnon View Post
The political pressure needs to be applied by all those parties who believe in a UI. In theory at least this applies to all the parties in the 26 counties. As it is they have shown unwillingness to get involved in the UI debate to any great extent. in that regard it is indeed left to SF. That being the case is it not more prudent to support the efforts of the party rather than be the hurler in the ditch with nothing realisitc to offer?
SF has a UI as the central core of party strategy, thus it is considerably more than cheap talk.
You are of course entitled to your opinion on the DUP.
There is nothing new about the Irish Parties apathy towards a united Ireland.

I don't doubt that Sinn Fein is commited to a United Ireland, I said that talk of persuasion to pro Westminster people was cheap and I haven't seen any evidence of this persuasion.

I want a United Ireland, I'm happy enough to wait until the majority in the 6 counties favours this, I don't support violence. As an average joe I don't really have anything realistic to offer with regards to a united ireland, except my vote - but why should i support Sinn Fein?
What has the party done for the people who voted for them in West Belfast - its a highly deprived area by all accounts with anti social behaviour at an all time high, the same could be said for Lurgan/Craigavon
In the course of the parties strategy to persue a united Ireland they have neglected the people who voted for them and their needs. It is this neglect that easily leads to youths with nothing only time on their hands, to support a dissident campaign - because there is absolutely nothing else on offer for them.
__________________
...
"Our culture is so individualistic that even the word 'we' is spelt with two I's"

LOL

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


For Ball, not Man playing

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 5,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiernanator View Post
HanleyS if there was no threat of violence the majority of people in the republic would gladly welcome the north. Maybe not at this time because of the worldwide recession,they probably couldn't afford the north now but just after the GFA there was an awful lot of goodwill towards the north and towards the idea of agreed unification. Partition is not good for Ireland. If you lived like I do on the border you would see how ridiculous the whole thing is.

I am not fixed on the idea of a unitary state but I do feel that northern nationalists have an absolute right to be part of the Irish body politic. This right has been half-heartedly guaranteed by the GFA but I think over time and with a lot of goodwill there could be a consolidation of the rights of northern nationalists as full Irish citizens. I hold an Irish passport and am therefore an Irish citizen, yet I have no real say in the body politic of my country. I do not resent or resist the rights of northern unionists to maintain strong links with Britain but I seek to have my rights as an Irish citizen recognised.

I think in essence these rights which have already been guaranteed by GFA need to be strengthened and this may move the political agenda forward. Issues like the Irish Language Act while appearing unimportant to outsiders are symbols that respect for both cultures in the north is real and ongoing. Blocking tactics by some unionists make it so easy for anti-GFA militarists within republicanism to say that nothing has changed.

Just one last point. Over the past number of years I and others have felt that we are being pressurised to conform to the status of being northern Irish and supporting the statelet of northern Ireland. While I will do or say nothing that will see it collapse by violent means I have no interest in it's continuance as a viable state. I long for it's demise and pray for the day it does not exist. No one can make me feel British or quasi-British northern Irish. I feel Irish. I am Irish.
The fact is that regardless of the threat of violence it would mean forcing a majority of people in the region against their will to come under the jurisdiction of the Irish state. Withstanding that, there is the continued threat of violence because if the Irish state did that then they would have abnadoned the principle of democracy and resorted to a form of gerrymandering. I personally don't believe that the majority of the people on the island of Ireland would support the abandonment of democracy, introducing a form of gerrymandering and handing the unionist majority a mandate for themselves abandoning democracy.

I fully agree with your points that you should have the right to be Irish citizen like those south/west of the border. This shouldn't however mean that those that wish to identify themselves as British should be forced to also be Irish citizens. As such a United Ireland is not viable against the wishes of the Unionist majority. The best that could possibly be hoped for in the short to medium is that Northern Ireland becomes a substate of both Ireland AND Britain. I think that this has already been implied by both governments as the Plan B should Stormont fail. I don't think this plan is in anyone's interests, nor a return to violence and bloodshed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Beginning of The End for Free Speech? A_man_about_a_dog Foreign Affairs 212 30th January 2009 02:43 AM
It's beginning to look an awful lot like .... Heathenmas! Andrew49 Political Humour 10 6th December 2008 03:30 PM
is ahern beginning to crack? digoutday Current Affairs 0 3rd December 2007 02:35 PM
Are we beginning to see the China we want to see? St Disibod Foreign Affairs 11 10th August 2007 10:30 PM
Beginning of the end for the Aherns? KingKane Fianna Fáil 12 19th September 2005 11:14 AM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.