Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Regional Discussion > Northern Ireland


The beginning of the end of the GFA

This is a discussion on The beginning of the end of the GFA within the Northern Ireland forums, part of the Regional Discussion category on Politics.ie. Originally Posted by Truth.ie The GFA was doomed from the start. It was built on lies, smoke and mirrors. The ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth.ie View Post
The GFA was doomed from the start. It was built on lies, smoke and mirrors.
The Unionists claimed it secured the Union, and defeated Republicanism.
The Constitutional Nationalists claimed it was a step towards unity.
One of the two was lying to it's base.
Seems the Unionists prediction was more accurate.
Draconian legislation was promised to be scrapped, yet it's worse now than the time when Civil Rights protestors were marching in the early 70s.
With Articles 2 and 3 done away with, we are left with some wishy washy aspiration to Irish sovereignty, and Hume like gobble-de gook claiming we can be Irish citizens in the North providing we accept British interference as part of life.

Exactly my sentiments. The provos still claim to have fought for a United Ireland but then wander on to the 'parity of esteem' goal when their failure is put to them. Caral Ni Cuilin on bbc radio today could only wafflle on and on about 'parity of esteeem' and, believe it or not 'the achievement of devolution'. So Poor Bobby Sands and people like him died for 'devolution' not to mention the hundreds and hundreds od completely innocent people who were killed (many by the IRA) and all for 'parity of esteem and Devolution.) It's has been and is a sick joke but Gerry and Martin made a few £s so that's o.k.

PSF, not in my name either
Reply With Quote

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #52 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Tiernanator's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by factual View Post
I think people here would support a UI only if it was supported by a majority of the folks up there in the six counties. That's the position in the GFA.

Interesting Factual that while you reiterated the usual line you did not feel that any of my points on citizenship were worth mentioning. Are you sure your in the right party?
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by factual View Post
Then you were not paying attention. A framework for getting to a United Ireland actually was very much part of the all party talks and was contained in the GFA which was supported by referendum. You lost that.
*sigh* The All party talks simply reinforced the British position. That of the Unionist veto. A United Ireland was not even on the table.
"The Union is Secure", UVF Leader Gusty Spence. Good Friday, 1998.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Pat Mc Larnon's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Belfast
Posts: 1,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth.ie View Post
By allowing an All Ireland referendum on unity. Free from British threats of car bombs in Dublin (see Mo Mowlam 1998).
All the Nationalist parties throughout the island could call for a Yes vote (as they currently pay lip service to).
The Unionists could call for a No vote. The biggest vote wins.
Quite simple. If it's a Yes vote the British must accept this, and make provisions to leave via a declaration of intent to withdraw, and a date, as they did in Hong Kong.
If the majority of the island vote No, I too will accept this, and emigrate to Mexico or as far and exotic as possible, but there must be no British interference in the referendum.
The British left Hong Kong, despite the majority of those living in Hong Kong wishing to keep the Union incidentally.
Your outcome is predicated on the British (and by that I include the 6 county British) agreeing to such a referendum in the first place. In circumstances where they are stridently opposed to such a referendum how do you advocate bringing about a UI?
BTW I am not trying to be difficult for the sake of it, it is just that you are a person who is opposed to the current SF strategy and is willing to discuss alternatives rather than shout slogans.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aindriu View Post
The whole point is that violence didn't work last time and will not work this time. All it will achieve is more death, destruction and grief.

The ONLY way forward is through dialogue.

I do agree that the Westminster government need to engage wikth the Unionists to drive through things like the Irish Language Act though. The Unionists have to accept that there are a group of people in the north who have a democratic right to see themselves as Irish and identify fully with their Irish heritage no matter how much that will stick in the Unionists' throats.

In the same vein, the Nationalists have to accdept the right of the Unionists to see themselves as British and identify with their culture.


Yes but Irish republicanism is not a rational creed, it looks to blood sacrifce and cleansing, hunger martyrdom, death etc for nationalist/tribal motivation.

By its nature its irrational and also fundementalist.


Thus it will always attract those who buy into its original sentiments in ever decreasing circles.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Tiernanator's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,845
Default

I have to say that when people talk of a million protestants being forced into a united Ireland they never say with the same vigour about the 700,0000+ nationalists who have been forced through threat of violence by loyalist paramilitaries to stay part of the UK. I don't agree with forcing anyone to do anything. I don't think it works and that is why I a member of Sinn Féin and tactically support the GFA but I do think some people are rather mealy-mouthed in their democratic credentials.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Tiernanator's Avatar
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greasytrucker View Post
yes but irish republicanism is not a rational creed, it looks to blood sacrifce and cleansing, hunger martyrdom, death etc for nationalist/tribal motivation.

By its nature its irrational and also fundementalist.


Thus it will always attract those who buy into its original sentiments in ever decreasing circles.

do not feed this troll......greasytrucker is a troll.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiernanator View Post
do not feed this troll......greasytrucker is a troll.

Does it not find its motivation from these things ?

From an athropological perspective it has similar psychological aspects similar to those of other fundemenalists around the world. glorfying the dead and their death is its cornerstone.

Look at some republican murals the way their dead are given saint like status, murals of them in clouds etc, to motivate followers to follow their life, example etc.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Mc Larnon View Post
Your outcome is predicated on the British (and by that I include the 6 county British) agreeing to such a referendum in the first place. In circumstances where they are stridently opposed to such a referendum how do you advocate bringing about a UI?
BTW I am not trying to be difficult for the sake of it, it is just that you are a person who is opposed to the current SF strategy and is willing to discuss alternatives rather than shout slogans.
This is a failure of the negotiating teams in the All Party Talks.
A referendum based on the majority of a statelet you don't even recognise is only shelving the problem for another day. The referendum should go ahead with or without British consent. They should be persuaded to take part, and International pressure should be laid,Republicans for their part should cease violence to accomodate a peaceful referendum, but if they refuse to take part they will be denying democracy to the vast majority of the Irish people.
Partition affects both sides of the border. Solutions to partition must involve both sides of the border. The Unionist minority cannot stop democratic constitutional change. Nationalist failure to negotiate, and British failure to lay a strong hand on Unionists condemned us all to decades more of the Status Quo.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 31
Default

okay i am a little off the beaten track here but clearly statements like,

"All people should be entitled to full social, economic and cultural equality." Mary Lou McDonald (Sinn Féin Vice President)

are as much a reason for the people of northern ireland to be disenchanted with local politics. And considering the majority of ireland really dont care for a untied ireland, along with the continuing realisation that the north would only destroy what sh*ty economy we have left in ireland, is it not surprising people would be less interested in all the boll*x that seems to flow out of the north.
__________________
"There's no such thing as a moderate. A moderate is just a liberal disguise, and they are doing everything they can to derail the conservative agenda."

Last edited by IrishConservative; 31st March 2009 at 11:34 AM. Reason: spelling mistake
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Beginning of The End for Free Speech? A_man_about_a_dog Foreign Affairs 212 30th January 2009 02:43 AM
It's beginning to look an awful lot like .... Heathenmas! Andrew49 Political Humour 10 6th December 2008 03:30 PM
is ahern beginning to crack? digoutday Current Affairs 0 3rd December 2007 02:35 PM
Are we beginning to see the China we want to see? St Disibod Foreign Affairs 11 10th August 2007 10:30 PM
Beginning of the end for the Aherns? KingKane Fianna Fáil 12 19th September 2005 11:14 AM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 PM.