Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > General Discussion > Media
Politics.ie RSS (on Feedburner) Politics.ie on Facebook Politics.ie on Twitter
Forgot Password? Get Started - Join P.ie!

Murdoch knew of phone hacking

This is a discussion on Murdoch knew of phone hacking within the Media forums, part of the General Discussion category on Politics.ie. Can someone point me in the direction of what law applies in this instance? What is the 'digital' equivalent of ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 295
Default

Can someone point me in the direction of what law applies in this instance? What is the 'digital' equivalent of the trespass law?

I would be interested to read if the intent to cause damage or fear is as integral a part in the 'virtual world' as it is in the physical.
Reply With Quote
Adbreak

 

These ads aren't visible if you're logged in. To get started create a free account - click here!


  #22 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rightsofman View Post
Can someone point me in the direction of what law applies in this instance? What is the 'digital' equivalent of the trespass law?

I would be interested to read if the intent to cause damage or fear is as integral a part in the 'virtual world' as it is in the physical.
I could be wrong but I don't think we have an equivalent of the UK's law on intercepting phone communications.

I think we should have though, because I think there are still some significant differences between the common law idea of trespass and this situation.

There are plenty of exceptions to the general principle of trespass, eg. people who are implicitly invited on to your property, meter readers, post-men etc. but it's hard to think of any good reasons why someone would be listening to your voicemail (without your permission). So, the malign intent is more clear-cut, in my opinion.

Also, the locked-door analogy works up to a point, but in a lot of cases, people aren't necessarily aware there's an electronic "lock" on their voicemail. You can buy a phone, use the voicemail, without changing, or even knowing there is a password on the voicemail. You only need to know the password if you want to access the VM from another phone.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 18,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orbit View Post
I could be wrong but I don't think we have an equivalent of the UK's law on intercepting phone communications.

I think we should have though, because I think there are still some significant differences between the common law idea of trespass and this situation.

There are plenty of exceptions to the general principle of trespass, eg. people who are implicitly invited on to your property, meter readers, post-men etc. but it's hard to think of any good reasons why someone would be listening to your voicemail (without your permission). So, the malign intent is more clear-cut, in my opinion.

Also, the locked-door analogy works up to a point, but in a lot of cases, people aren't necessarily aware there's an electronic "lock" on their voicemail. You can buy a phone, use the voicemail, without changing, or even knowing there is a password on the voicemail. You only need to know the password if you want to access the VM from another phone.
As usual, there's a good Digital Rights page! Our privacy laws don't seem to cover it, so DRI have complained to the EU Commission...
__________________
Never let the best be the enemy of the good.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rightsofman View Post
Can someone point me in the direction of what law applies in this instance? What is the 'digital' equivalent of the trespass law?

I would be interested to read if the intent to cause damage or fear is as integral a part in the 'virtual world' as it is in the physical.
In the UK the relevant law is the Regulation of Investigative Powers Act 2000 (RIPA).
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ibis View Post
As usual, there's a good Digital Rights page! Our privacy laws don't seem to cover it, so DRI have complained to the EU Commission...
That makes for some truly scary reading, lets hope the situation is addressed, and properly.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 21st July 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,646
Default

If someone listening in on your phone calls doesn't breach your privacy I don't know what does
__________________
Google Reader great for following blogs

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rupert Murdoch says Obama will win in landslide cyberianpan US Politics 9 2nd June 2008 02:05 PM
The Murdoch Empire to assimilate the Wall Street Journal St Disibod Media 10 2nd August 2007 05:01 AM
Journalist charged in phone hacking probe David Cochrane Foreign Affairs 2 10th August 2006 11:40 AM
Iran, Uranium, Congo, Propaganda, Murdoch. SPN Foreign Affairs 10 9th August 2006 11:56 AM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.

Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Privacy Statement - Top - © Pie Media Limited (Ireland)