Politics.ie
Advertise on Politics.ie

Go Back   Politics.ie > Topical Discussion > Europe > Lisbon Treaty

Has the no to Lisbon campaign in Ireland been terminally damaged?

This is a discussion on Has the no to Lisbon campaign in Ireland been terminally damaged? within the Lisbon Treaty forums, part of the Europe category on Politics.ie. Exactly for all the rest, but not to this : Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach The Dutch PVV's success and that ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brest, fr
Posts: 611
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Exactly for all the rest, but not to this :

Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach View Post
The Dutch PVV's success and that of anti-Lisbon leftists gives us a fair idea.
Many supporters of the No did not want to vote leftist; and many leftist voters did not turn out to vote.
__________________
My name is Plissken

Advertise on Politics.ie

  #192 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnaudherve View Post
No, it isn't.



Because they were afraid of generalized poverty.



I research that. I am indeed always surprised by the depth of the wrong doing
Wow there was just 1 reason that both countries voted against the Constitution!? What are the odds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach View Post
Let the Dutch and French govts put it to referenda if they're so sure their ppls are satisfied with the removal of references to the flag and anthem and renaming the EU Foreign Minister the High Representative is sufficient to overcome the loss of 40 vetoes and the conferral of all the powers of a Supreme Court on the ECJ. The Dutch PVV's success and that of anti-Lisbon leftists gives us a fair idea. The will of the people, expressed in referenda, must be respected or next the politicians will reject election results and dictatorship beckons.
If the French were not happy with Lisbon we would all know about it. It's not like they are afraid to protest or anything. The fact that they haven't plus the fact that they happily (very happily as I recall) elected someone who stated he would ratify Lisbon without a referendum and you have compelling evidence that they were happy enough with the Treaty. That as against absolutely no evidence thus far of them not being happy. If you have some now is the time to share.

It is not your right to demand or insist on referenda in other countries. That is up to them and noone elses. You complain about some apparent loss of sovereignty here but yet you also feel you have the right to ignore the sovereignty of other nations when it suits you. Not avery good quality, hypocracy.
  #193 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by molloyjh View Post
I presume you are referring to the Constitution rather than Lisbon, which is a different thing altogether.

Goodnight.
  #194 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brest, fr
Posts: 611
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by molloyjh View Post
If the French were not happy with Lisbon we would all know about it. It's not like they are afraid to protest or anything. The fact that they haven't plus the fact that they happily (very happily as I recall) elected someone who stated he would ratify Lisbon without a referendum
The majority voted for someone who would ratify a "mini-treaty", by which was meant a constitutional treaty without part III, the economic part.

Quote:
Originally Posted by molloyjh View Post
and you have compelling evidence that they were happy enough with the Treaty. That as against absolutely no evidence thus far of them not being happy. If you have some now is the time to share.
I suggest then that they have a second referendum, since all important people seem to believe it's ok to have second referenda. You will have your compelling evidence then.
__________________
My name is Plissken
  #195 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnaudherve View Post
The majority voted for someone who would ratify a "mini-treaty", by which was meant a constitutional treaty without part III, the economic part.



I suggest then that they have a second referendum, since all important people seem to believe it's ok to have second referenda. You will have your compelling evidence then.
They can't have a second one because it has been ratified already. Either way what you are saying is you have no evidence to back up your claims. Maybe you should think about that before making them yeah?
  #196 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcadius View Post
I think we should be more worried about the Lapps.
We don't want to end up like the reindeer.

*waits excitedly for Adrian Wainer's Youtube video on Santa's war-crimes*
The Santa War

Well actually you've got it all wrong, I have a posting somewhere on the net which examines the possibility that 2009 will be the year that "radical" Islam will declare War on Santa and things will happen like Syrian fighter aircraft will attempt to shoot down Santa's Sleigh, when its cloaking device fails. I am speaking from my memory of this posting, so I might have some aspects wrong, but I hope that gives the general idea.

Official NORAD Santa Tracker

SANTA SLEIGH INSPECTION

Actually, the above DOT link is rather misleading, as it would give the impression that Santa's sleigh is powered by conventional hydrogen fuel cells, the reality is that Santa's sleigh is driven by an atomic nuclear fusion device. That said, the nuclear fusion motor is only the slow speed engine which provides power when Santa's sleigh is maybe very slowly maneuvering to approach people's roofs and chimneys, to when the sleigh is traveling at near light speeds. For acceleration through the light speed barrier and time travel capability, Santa's sleigh uses a different propulsion technology, the details of which, few are known and those that are, are barely understood.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer

Last edited by Adrian Wainer; 10th June 2009 at 10:02 PM.
  #197 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brest, fr
Posts: 611
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by molloyjh View Post
They can't have a second one because it has been ratified already.
Oh that's right. My mistake.

I always forget that if a No result is certain, holding a second referendum is not a good idea. Stupid me.
__________________
My name is Plissken
  #198 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnaudherve View Post
Oh that's right. My mistake.

I always forget that if a No result is certain, holding a second referendum is not a good idea. Stupid me.
First of all a No result is far from certain. In fact I have seen no evidence, read NONE, that a No would be returned. Secondly a second referendum cannot be held about something that has already happened. They could in theory have a referendum to repeal the ratification, although I don't know the legal ins and outs of such a move.

This really isn't difficult stuff, I can't see why you're having such issues with it.
  #199 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brest, fr
Posts: 611
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by molloyjh View Post
First of all a No result is far from certain. In fact I have seen no evidence, read NONE, that a No would be returned. Secondly a second referendum cannot be held about something that has already happened. They could in theory have a referendum to repeal the ratification, although I don't know the legal ins and outs of such a move.

This really isn't difficult stuff, I can't see why you're having such issues with it.
We were talking about the French referendum in the last messages, and the publicly declared decision to ratify it through parliament, because a No was certain.

Or if you were talking about the French referendum, you should have written "was far from certain" instead of "is far from certain", and "would have been returned" instead of "would be returned".

I know it's late, but try to concentrate.
__________________
My name is Plissken
  #200 (permalink)  
Old 10th June 2009
Politics.ie Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Night of the Senses
Posts: 5,414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkpower View Post
The climate has changed and that will be enough.
People felt comfortable 12 months ago and were able to take a free swipe at the EU.
Now they do not and they will be very reluctant to do the same.
It was hardly a "free swipe" at the EU but the expression in various ways of some very real concerns about the loss of sovereignty.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drkpower View Post
You can argue the rights and wrongs till the cows come home. Fear will carry it this time.
Which way though? A lot about the EU is frightening.
__________________
"The perfect liberty they seek is the liberty of making slaves of other people." -- Abraham Lincoln


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 

Tags
ganley, labour, libertas, lisbon, sinnott lisbon europe
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tourism Ireland launches new friendly Ireland campaign...will the Gardai be included? myk Economy 5 9th July 2009 10:07 PM
Green Party terminally ill alchemist Elections 17 7th June 2009 03:26 PM
Will Cowen be seriously damaged if Lisbon Falls? badboy2 Fianna Fáil 44 2nd January 2009 01:55 PM
Lisbon campaign takes to the sky David Cochrane Lisbon Treaty 20 8th June 2008 10:57 PM
Yes to Lisbon...what would it mean for the no campaign? Supermanpolitician Lisbon Treaty 23 19th April 2008 08:33 PM


Advertise on Politics.ie

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 PM.