l am curious to see if it would be workable for a number of reasons, not least among these the road-kill that resulted in the pre-recess guillotined debates on Crime (gangland) and their idiotic response to the Blasphemy legislation. To me a social dividend policy would require looking at co-location and hospital amalgamation- not well placed leaks to the SBP : http://www.thepost.ie/story/eyeymhojmh/

<Mod> This thread has been merged with "Results of Green Party Preferendum..... NAMA to be further modified???" </Mod>

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Recently I cant understand your posts. What are you asking? Road kill?

l reckon Green attempts both in government and formerly in opposition to get their clauses into legislation mostly fail. Despite their inroads into fast-track FF planning.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

So you wan the Green party to use NAMA to negotiate something? What is worth €60bn to you? Tara?

l published their link in the OP, which l feel to be cosmetic given their other failures in achieving clauses in FF legislation : http://www.politics.ie/oireachtas/10...gislation.html

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pinging this April report on NAMA and planning : Planning head urges key role for assets body - The Irish Times - Wed, Apr 29, 2009

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The problem with this is that
a) it would presumably mean NAMA getting lower prices for its properties and thus costing more
b) if it is illegal to lobby NAMA, how is anyone going to "ask" NAMA to let it have properties at "fair" prices?

__________________
Vive le Québec libre ! Ag beathú na dtochardán ón mbliain 2007.

You could have at least tried to explain what is was. This isnt "LookAtThisCoolLink.ie"

hence a junior coalition partner clause...

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

This is the 9.33am report on the Social Dividend issue Via the Irish Times, SBP was
Tweeting this Yesterday evening:

Green Party calls for 'social dividend' in Nama Bill - The Irish Times - Mon, Sep 14, 2009

So I am pinging the April meeting on Planning which first discussed the issue in terms of runaway planning
and the relationship to planning between the main and junior coalition partners:

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...245599352.html

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.