No but she is attacking him for who he is, and inciting others to do so and that is wrong!!!
Yes she does have a right to be wrong but she does not have the right to attack people because they don't conform to her views and to incite others to do so!!!
The latest news--I know a few people were watching this story. I don't know why I defended this crappy cowtown as just needing a little bit of nudging into the 21s century. The final outcome was sad for the students, pathetic and outrageous on the part of the parents and school board.
Miss. lesbian attends 'fake prom' as classmates party in secret -
bye-bye Empire, Empire bye-bye
juvenile school yard stunt carried out by the supposed adults of the school board assisted by gun toting, wild wild west wannabe red necks.
Stories like this really make me wonder about America and it's wars, what was the point of fighting the British for "freedom", what was the point battling the nazis when at home they still had racial segregation, what was the point in "liberating" Iraq when at home their citizens are subjected to the same bile and hatered.
"Attacking" by merely expressing a nonviolent view publicly?
I don't think gays (or blacks, or immigrants - of which I am one, or most other groups) are so vulnerable that they require censorship of mere words (not to be confused with incitement to violence).
"Attacking" is not what she did or incited.Yes she does have a right to be wrong but she does not have the right to attack people because they don't conform to her views and to incite others to do so!!!
NOTE: I am not saying she was right. I am only saying leave her alone.
Last edited by MichaelR; 8th April 2010 at 11:33 PM.