Register to Comment
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 95 of 95
Like Tree27Likes
  1. #91
    HereWeGoAgain HereWeGoAgain is offline

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    12,504

    One of the survivors of abuse,Frank Doherty, recently lost his battle for life, now his wife continues his campaign, listen to his story here

    BBC Radio 4 - File on 4, The Secrets of Smyllum Park
    The Secrets of Smyllum Park
    File on 4

    Over many generations the Catholic church provided shelter and care for vulnerable children whose families had been broken by death or poverty. But many of those who grew up in these orphanages claim the care they offered amounted to years of serious beatings and emotional abuse which scarred them for life.

    File on 4 investigates one such former institution, Smyllum Park in Lanark, uncovering new evidence of alleged abuse and raising serious questions about child deaths at the orphanage, before it was closed in 1981.

    In Scotland, the ongoing child abuse inquiry has vowed to get to the bottom of what happened at Smyllum Park and other children's homes but it has been beset with delays, resignations and claims of political interference.

    File on 4 asks whether the inquiry is digging deep enough to uncover the truth about what happened at Smyllum Park and why it has taken more than 50 years for the truth to come out.
    BBC Radio 4 - File on 4, The Secrets of Smyllum Park
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  2. #92
    Cruimh Cruimh is offline
    Cruimh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    96,223

    Quote Originally Posted by HereWeGoAgain View Post
    One of the survivors of abuse,Frank Doherty, recently lost his battle for life, now his wife continues his campaign, listen to his story here

    BBC Radio 4 - File on 4, The Secrets of Smyllum Park


    BBC Radio 4 - File on 4, The Secrets of Smyllum Park
    Gosh, records "lost" and destroyed in fires and leaks .....

    Fires seem to have been very common
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  3. #93
    blinding blinding is offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    9,162

    Anyone would think they are buying time and hoping all involved are dead....Then End of .
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  4. #94
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

  5. #95
    Kilbarry1 Kilbarry1 is offline

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,992

    ‘Floundering’ Abuse Inquiry Has hearings on Just 36 Days a Year

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...year-v8fw3gcc0

    The child sex abuse inquiry set up by Theresa May is holding public evidence hearings on only 36 days a year on average, despite costs of £21m a year. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) was set up in 2015 and hearings are due to continue until March 2019. ..........

    Among the many cases being investigated, one involves the late Lord Janner, which has attracted controversy because the IICSA is supposed to be looking at cases of institutional failings, not the alleged guilt or innocence of individuals. When Alexis Jay took over as chairwoman in August last year after the resignation of Lowell Goddard, a judge from New Zealand, the inquiry changed the terms of reference to say it would be looking at whether institutions failed to respond to allegations about Janner, the former Labour MP.

    However, no evidence hearings have been listed for the Janner case. In May, The Sunday Times revealed that all the private claims for damages against Janner’s estate had collapsed. Daniel Janner, a leading QC and son of the late peer, said: “The fact that there are so few public evidence hearings over four years shows how the whole inquiry is floundering. We are appalled and dismayed. This unjust strand on my father should never have started and certainly have been dropped when the civil proceedings were all discontinued in May. ......The IICSA said the Janner case was not being dropped.


    Note that the Inquiry was supposed to look into Institutional Abuse. The late Lord Janner was NOT an Institution but he was the subject of a witch-hunt so the Inquiry just expanded their terms of reference to include him. All claims in the CIVIL court against Lord Janner have now been dropped (the chief accuser claimed he was raped at a time when Janner was actually in Australia!) but the Inquiry is continuing to target him. His son, leading barrister Daniel Janner was refused the right to cross-examine his father's accusers during the Inquiry. At this stage the IICSA probably wish the Janner case would just disappear but if they drop it, the "Victims" will start screaming "Cover-Up". So the insanity continues!
    Sign in or Register Now to reply

Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Sign in to CommentRegister to Comment