Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Tribunal lawyers net 1.1m on typo

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular CitiZenJonredux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dublin 1
    Posts
    465

    Tribunal lawyers net 1.1m on typo

    I nearly choked on my cuppa when I read this.
    And now, with coffee dripping from my nose I have to say, I have really had enough.
    [FONT="Arial Black"]WTF!!![/FONT]

    THE TIMES
    A typographical error by a government official in 2002 resulted in two barristers employed by the Moriarty tribunal earning an extra €1m over the past six years.

    The “typo” seven years ago added €250 per day to the agreed €2,250 “per diem” fee paid to John Coughlan and Jerry Healy, the two highest-earning barristers in all the recent tribunals.
    I am so sick of this.
    Despite being spotted shortly after it occurred, the mistake was not corrected by the Department of Finance. After legal advice the higher payment of €2,500 was sanctioned, so Coughlan and Healy were paid a higher per diem than any barrister in any tribunal.
    Did I miss something? Is profiting by defraud at the public's expense acceptable to the state? If not then why do our elected representatives sanction this?

    GODDAMNIT MR BEALE [SIZE="5"]I'M AS MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GONNA TAKE THIS ANY MORE[/SIZE]!!!!!

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu-nhba0Bck]YouTube - Network - Mad As Hell[/ame]
    without condoning or condemning

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular BodyofEvidence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,283

    sure, its only money (source - Dept of Finance).....

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular CitiZenJonredux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dublin 1
    Posts
    465

    without condoning or condemning

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular Gabha Óir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    An Fáinne Fí
    Posts
    4,435

    I love the bit about letting them away with it due to legal advice....so they had to pay another brief more money to tell them whether they could get their money back......wonderful

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    5,891

    I'm telling you...from the moment of the conception of tribunals (probably all drunk in Buswells) those guys are breaking their hearts laughing at us.
    A P.ie moderator stated this on June 25th 2010: P.ie tolerates very broad free speech, and thus allows sectarian bigotry etc

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EU - Atlantic Province
    Posts
    368

    Arrange these words to make a sentence.....

    'Republic' 'f##king' 'Banana'

    Answers on a post to:

    de de de de Dail.
    Dublin 2
    Obama - the first half White US President

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular CitiZenJonredux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dublin 1
    Posts
    465

    Quote Originally Posted by Kev408 View Post
    I'm telling you...from the moment of the conception of tribunals (probably all drunk in Buswells) those guys are breaking their hearts laughing at us.
    well there was one Boswells buddy who wasn't laughing last May. His Mahon golem them turned around to bite him in the ass.

    The 1921 statutes that provide for the Tribunals in the Irish State need to be upgraded, they are profoundly flawed: a state inquiry into matters of urgent public concern should not take over a decade to conclude its investigations.

    Permitting witnesses qualified privilege was bound to run into difficulties if you have those guilty of wrongdoing committing perjury to cover-up corruption in our nation's government. but what else do we have to bring these prodigal scoundrels and bag-men to book.
    Last edited by CitiZenJonredux; 23rd February 2009 at 08:47 PM. Reason: typo
    without condoning or condemning

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    5,891

    Quote Originally Posted by CitiZenJonredux View Post
    well there was one Boswells buddy who wasn't laughing last May. His Mahon golem them turned around to bite him in the ass.

    The 1921 statutes that provide for the Tribunals in the Irish State need to be upgraded, they are profoundly flawed: a state inquiry into matters of urgent public concern should not take over a decade to conclude its investigations.

    Permitting witnesses qualified privilege was bound to run into difficulties if you have those guilty of wrongdoing committing perjury to cover-up corruption in our nation's government. but what else do we have to bring these prodigal scoundrels and the bag-men to book.
    The police?
    A P.ie moderator stated this on June 25th 2010: P.ie tolerates very broad free speech, and thus allows sectarian bigotry etc

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Royalty toxic avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    21,790

    As I understand it, the two lawyers themselves had nothing to do with the typo or with the decision on legal advice not to seek the money back. Calling it fraud is libel...

    As to the general griping about the Tribunals, see here : http://www.politics.ie/tribunals/454...ery-penny.html

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    762

    Originally Posted by CitiZenJonredux
    well there was one Boswells buddy who wasn't laughing last May. His Mahon golem them turned around to bite him in the ass.

    The 1921 statutes that provide for the Tribunals in the Irish State need to be upgraded, they are profoundly flawed: a state inquiry into matters of urgent public concern should not take over a decade to conclude its investigations.

    Permitting witnesses qualified privilege was bound to run into difficulties if you have those guilty of wrongdoing committing perjury to cover-up corruption in our nation's government. but what else do we have to bring these prodigal scoundrels and the bag-men to book.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kev408 View Post
    The police?
    Send the Criminal Assets Bureau after them?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Lawyers' letter blunder
    By Helium Three in forum Europe
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 13th May 2012, 01:47 PM
  2. Lawyers, Consultants untouchable!
    By joel in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2nd July 2009, 08:36 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12th April 2009, 02:44 AM
  4. Lawyers on go slow
    By He3 in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 26th March 2009, 12:15 PM
  5. Lenihan says; Lawyers are not economists !!!
    By droghedasouth in forum Economy
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 19th October 2008, 06:41 PM