View Poll Results: Would you agree Metro North is a worthwhile project?

Voters
39. You must be logged in to vote on this poll. Please login or register for free
  • Yes

    34 87.18%
  • No

    5 12.82%
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: Route of Metro North announced

  1. #61
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,731

    please remember the land use effects that always occur with rail. One day the Metro will reach capacity. I think too much waffle is spouted by third rate economists on railway investment because they don't understand that if you build it, the people will come.I'm sure people were saying Luas wouldn't be used when it was first planned and look at it now, the green line is already overstretched and will need to be upgraded sooner rather then later

    the figures being quoted are the initial passenger numbers, on day one. These will grow hugely very quickly.

    The other point that's been overlooked in this thread is that Metro will be segregated, rather than on-street like Luas. therefore it is higher quality and faster, making it a far more effective service than Luas
    We need to radically change every system that has enabled the wholesale destruction of the Irish landscape, rural and urban. There is no time for incremental step by step measures. The systems have failed utterly and the only hope for a real recovery requires the rule book to be torn up completely.

  2. #62
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fingal
    Posts
    2,684

    Re: Please pay attention!

    Quote Originally Posted by GJG
    According to wikipedia, Dublin has a higher density than Munich (which has a very good metro) and is not that much lower density than London (4,300/km2 compared to 4,700/km2). My impression of London is that most of the Greater London area is semi-d country a lot like Dublin.
    This Wikipedia page is wildly wrong because it isn't comparing like with like. Dublin has nothing like a population density of 4,300. If you check out this page you will see that this only applies to the city council area, where only a portion of the metro is set to run. Either you consider the city a very small area (city council) in which there isnt enough population to justify a metro, or you draw the boundaries wide (the whole county) in which case the population is much too thin.
    I wouldn't agree with that. If you include the whole county then you are then including vast amounts of undeveloped space, some of which will be developed and you have to then consider the population density as it will be not as it is now.

  3. #63
    GJG
    GJG is online now
    Politics.ie Regular GJG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,663

    Re: Please pay attention!

    Quote Originally Posted by michael1965
    I wouldn't agree with that. If you include the whole county then you are then including vast amounts of undeveloped space, some of which will be developed and you have to then consider the population density as it will be not as it is now.
    I totally agree, but the assessment has to be realistic. I would love Dublin to be high density city with good services, but that ain't comin any time soon. The situation right now is that we have an extremely low-density city. The underdeveloped space is in the inner city as much as on the outskirts.

    Public transport projects are a perfect way to encourage development, and yes, we should build for future capacity, but this government can propose madcap schemes, such as motorways (capacity 12,000 vehicles per hour) to Sligo (pop. 18,000). This is clearly a case of penis-envy rather than sensible transport planning.

    I'm concerned that either we are getting some below-par system (as is suggested by the very low capacity figures - 34M, as opposed to 206M on the Northern Line) or the taxpayer is being asked to fund the Martin Cullen memorial hole in the ground.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    , published by Brandon. "A cracker!" - Eddie Hobbs; "Months of research" - Noel Whelan

  4. #64
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,731

    Quote Originally Posted by GJG
    Quote Originally Posted by michael1965
    I wouldn't agree with that. If you include the whole county then you are then including vast amounts of undeveloped space, some of which will be developed and you have to then consider the population density as it will be not as it is now.
    I totally agree, but the assessment has to be realistic. I would love Dublin to be high density city with good services, but that ain't comin any time soon. The situation right now is that we have an extremely low-density city. The underdeveloped space is in the inner city as much as on the outskirts.

    Public transport projects are a perfect way to encourage development, and yes, we should build for future capacity, but this government can propose madcap schemes, such as motorways (capacity 12,000 vehicles per hour) to Sligo (pop. 18,000). This is clearly a case of penis-envy rather than sensible transport planning.

    I'm concerned that either we are getting some below-par system (as is suggested by the very low capacity figures - 34M, as opposed to 206M on the Northern Line) or the taxpayer is being asked to fund the Martin Cullen memorial hole in the ground.
    Firstly, Cullen deserves neither blame nor credit for the Metro, just the delays and the general muddiness that has enveloped Transport planning in Dublin since he took over.., where's the DTA ffs??

    what's the source for your capacity figures?

    and as for density, yeh it's true that this is a very low density city. It's impossible to compare cities though coz all countries use different definitions for "city". In Dublin the "metropolitan area" extends from Swords to Greystones and as far west as Maynooth. That's the official definition used.

    what is doubtless is that the residential density guidelines are having a massive effect in Dublin (not so much in the regions outer counties). Take a look at the following locations for an illustration:
    1. N11 at Stillorgan/mount Merrion
    2. Adamstown
    3. Sandyford Industrial Estate
    4. Tallaght Town Centre
    5. Stepaside/Sandyford Village
    6. Docklands
    7. Heuston Station

    Also check out the plans for the North Fringe and the former Dun Laoghaire and Bray Golf Clubs. Consolidation and intensification are happening in the urban area and all these areas are dependent on high quality public transport.

    And I agree totally with your motorway comments. This is exemplified most horribly by the construction of the M1, M2 and M3. At least 2 of these are practically parallel near the city. They never questioned the old network. Do we really need motorways to Derry and Sligo? I sincerely doubt it. Caeucescu-era nonsense...
    We need to radically change every system that has enabled the wholesale destruction of the Irish landscape, rural and urban. There is no time for incremental step by step measures. The systems have failed utterly and the only hope for a real recovery requires the rule book to be torn up completely.

  5. #65
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fingal
    Posts
    2,684

    Quote Originally Posted by alonso
    Quote Originally Posted by GJG
    Quote Originally Posted by michael1965
    I wouldn't agree with that. If you include the whole county then you are then including vast amounts of undeveloped space, some of which will be developed and you have to then consider the population density as it will be not as it is now.
    I totally agree, but the assessment has to be realistic. I would love Dublin to be high density city with good services, but that ain't comin any time soon. The situation right now is that we have an extremely low-density city. The underdeveloped space is in the inner city as much as on the outskirts.

    Public transport projects are a perfect way to encourage development, and yes, we should build for future capacity, but this government can propose madcap schemes, such as motorways (capacity 12,000 vehicles per hour) to Sligo (pop. 18,000). This is clearly a case of penis-envy rather than sensible transport planning.

    I'm concerned that either we are getting some below-par system (as is suggested by the very low capacity figures - 34M, as opposed to 206M on the Northern Line) or the taxpayer is being asked to fund the Martin Cullen memorial hole in the ground.
    Firstly, Cullen deserves neither blame nor credit for the Metro, just the delays and the general muddiness that has enveloped Transport planning in Dublin since he took over.., where's the DTA ffs??

    what's the source for your capacity figures?

    and as for density, yeh it's true that this is a very low density city. It's impossible to compare cities though coz all countries use different definitions for "city". In Dublin the "metropolitan area" extends from Swords to Greystones and as far west as Maynooth. That's the official definition used.

    what is doubtless is that the residential density guidelines are having a massive effect in Dublin (not so much in the regions outer counties). Take a look at the following locations for an illustration:
    1. N11 at Stillorgan/mount Merrion
    2. Adamstown
    3. Sandyford Industrial Estate
    4. Tallaght Town Centre
    5. Stepaside/Sandyford Village
    6. Docklands
    7. Heuston Station

    Also check out the plans for the North Fringe and the former Dun Laoghaire and Bray Golf Clubs. Consolidation and intensification are happening in the urban area and all these areas are dependent on high quality public transport.
    8. Swords.

    All of the latest development in Swords is high density.

    BTW. I'm pretty sure the N4 to Sligo is not motorway. It consists of improvements to the existing road, and single-carriageway bypasses where needed.

  6. #66
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,731

    yeh i meant the N/M3, which in fact leads nowhere of any significance beyond Navan. No offence Cavan and Enniskillen, but jaysus, a motorway??? ffs!
    We need to radically change every system that has enabled the wholesale destruction of the Irish landscape, rural and urban. There is no time for incremental step by step measures. The systems have failed utterly and the only hope for a real recovery requires the rule book to be torn up completely.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Similar Threads

  1. Metro-North decision tomorrow?
    By David Cochrane in forum Transport
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 5th November 2008, 01:10 PM
  2. Metro North a gonner?
    By David Cochrane in forum Transport
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 9th August 2008, 01:47 PM
  3. metro west "emerging prefered route"....
    By constitutionus in forum Transport
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 19th December 2007, 04:51 PM
  4. Bailey brothers set to cash in on Metro North route
    By droghedasouth in forum Economy
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 15th November 2007, 09:29 PM
  5. Metro north diversion to add €2m and 2sec
    By seabhcan in forum Transport
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7th November 2007, 11:52 AM