
Originally Posted by
clearasmud
I think it would be prudent to know the facts before posting. The article is severely flawed, and in reality further enhances my personal opinion of the sloppy journalism the Indo has been akin to for some time. Laura Noonan has been fishing around this recently and her research is sketchy to say the least. She is trying to turn a seed into an apple and is getting carried away with herself. To put it in perspective Tailwind relates to only 1.8% of the company. The pension fund holding is entirely different. This small 1.8% is not the reason that Ryanair didn't get the company. As I understand it the share has been kept by the company Tailwind as they have now decided to get rid of their outstanding loan with the lending institution by paying the loan off directly by the members themselves. It's the lending instiution that will lose out, as the decision has been taken to pay this back early, thus losing out on the interest on the remainder of the loan term.
Remember 30k is the equivalent of less that one third a brand new pilot's salary in the comany. It's pittance. And you also have to remember you only lose the money if you sell the shares, something Tailwind have no intention of doing at all.
I wouldn't be getting too excited about this story.