Aindriu,
Indeed its applicability might be limited but when I came across it it seemed to show that the immediate assumption of bigger engines being the problem might not be the problem. Just trying to start a debate.
I think your point on a young driver being able to test in a micra and then move up to a sports car a day later is a good one.
Rebel CNC,
The NRA has a report from 2000 where they define young drivers as those between 18-24. They found that:
[FONT=Arial]In 2000, young car drivers accounted for 37% of all car drivers killed and 18%
of all car drivers injured.
[FONT=Arial]Young motorcycle drivers (18-24) accounted for 51% of all motorcycle drivers
killed and 41% of all injured in 2000.
and ..
[FONT=Arial]In 2000 the young male driver responsibility rate – the proportion of accidents
in which they were involved and deemed to be “to a large extent responsible”
– was higher for fatal (83%) than for serious (70%) or minor (55%) accidents.
That is, the greater the injury severity of accidents involving young male
drivers the greater the likelihood that they would be deemed to be responsible
to a large degree for the accident. Source
The cohort they used is less than the one you asked for but it makes the point you are suggesting. Fatality and age are incontrevertibly linked and the only question is how is this going to be tackled.
[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]