Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Arthur Morgan urging SF delegates to do another U-Turn

  1. #11
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,266

    Just to say thank you to who ever put up the extracts from Arthur Morgan. I have a bit of a history and interest in this topic and look forward to directly qouting Deputy Morgan next year at the Council wehn we adopt a new Book of Estimates. Again Go raibh, mile, mile, maith agat.

  2. #12
    DOD
    DOD is offline
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    10,430

    Quote Originally Posted by cllr
    Just to say thank you to who ever put up the extracts from Arthur Morgan. I have a bit of a history and interest in this topic and look forward to directly qouting Deputy Morgan next year at the Council wehn we adopt a new Book of Estimates. Again Go raibh, mile, mile, maith agat.
    Strangely enough, our councillors are allowed disagree with Arthur Morgan.
    "John Bull has got his hand down your pants and his fist around your bollox and you can't see it."

  3. #13
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    105

    I think delegates were right to vote against the amendment. Of course we're against bin charges ON PRINCIPLE, therefore any councillor that votes against policy and principle should be subject to discipline up to and including expulsion.

    Trying to water down the parties position in this way, like they did with the motion on partnership, is wrong and is the beginning of a slippery slope towards accepting these fundamentaly non socialist and non republican principles.
    To be a student and not a revolutionary is a contradiction.
    -Salvador Allende

  4. #14
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,358

    The amendment wasn't about trying to water down our position. It restated our strong opposition to the service charges and our commitment to trying to get rid of them. It simply recognised the reality that they can no longer be gotten rid of at local government level. It still would require our councillors to vote against them UNLESS they made a very strong case to the Ard Chomhairle why they shouldn't do (which as I noted, in the year when this amendment was party policy, didn't happen).

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Obama's latest U-turn: Florida & Michigan delegates
    By mccafferty cat in forum US Politics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 6th August 2008, 01:25 AM
  2. Are FF canvassers urging 'No' voters not to vote?
    By QuestionsQuigley in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11th June 2008, 09:28 PM
  3. Only 251 Delegates left after May 6th
    By mairteenpak in forum US Politics
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 29th April 2008, 12:53 AM
  4. Arthur McBride
    By felixed in forum Culture & Community
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14th July 2007, 04:00 PM
  5. Arthur Griffiths
    By Ifor in forum History
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 8th May 2007, 07:44 PM