I disagree with the analysis in todays Cork Examiner by Paul O'Brien which states
"Why on earth didn't SF push the issue more aggressively sooner? Yet again, it will raise questions about party strategy "
This in my view is a very naive assessment. Clearly if SF pressed the issue they would have met with the same kind of hostile reaction that was received from a very vocal minority on politics.ie when this matter was first posted. A previous poster has referred to this. Fortunately they were exposed and answered by the open minded majority here.
IMHO SF took a tactical decision to allow others to run with the story in the Dail. I presume that they didn't care who got the praise as long as they got the result that they wanted. And Boy, did they get a result.
Just speaking about the Cork Examiner, I thought that Willie O'Dea got a very soft ride in the articles by Jimmy Woulfe. Jimmy used to be with the Limerick Leader.
In contrast to the soft coverage from the Cork Examiner, I'd like to quote from a letter in todays Irish Times, which I believe speaks for many of us here in Limerick
"Madam, – As a Limerick man, I ask if Limerick city councillors and supporters of Willie O’Dea would stop generalising and being presumptuous by stating that all of Limerick supports Mr O’Dea?
They do not have right to speak for me or any other individual. What Mr O’Dea did was wrong. What he has done for Limerick is questionable. – Yours, etc,
STEPHEN O’DOWD,
The Village,
Adare, Co Limerick."
Aftermath of O'Dea's resignation - The Irish Times - Sat, Feb 20, 2010
.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote