Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: McDowell's position now untenable?

  1. #21
    Politics.ie Member FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dept. of FutureTaoiseach
    Posts
    39,825

    Quote Originally Posted by Leopold Bloom
    Yes, Future Taoiseach, but if Bertie was "selective and partial" (quotes because these are McDowell's words) in his Autumn statement, how can McDowell be any more sure that Bertie's statement later this week on his personal finances will be any different?
    We can't. It will be a judgement call. We should give the Taoiseach an opportunity to respond to the allegations.

    Is it not as plain as the nose on your face that trust has totally broken down between the two men and the PDs are merely hanging on in there for political expediency?
    I think trust has been undermined but perhaps not fatally.

  2. #22
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    east galway
    Posts
    447

    How can two partys that do not trust each other stay in goverment or form a goverment???

  3. #23
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,224

    Future Taoiseach says:

    We can't. It will be a judgement call.
    But McDowell made a similar judgment call last October and it's quite clear that he got it totally arseways - not much of a judge, is he?

    We should give the Taoiseach an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
    Yes, but how many chances are you going to give him?
    Political language. . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
    George Orwell

  4. #24
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    89

    Mc dowells position is indeed untenable. I assume all on this site are adults and as adults we know right from wrong and we can equally recognise stupidity when we see it. What Mc Dowell did was crass stupidity. He has effectivly destroyed his reputation and his party. He applied his maxim "Radical or Redundant". Well try as we might to understand his thinking it surely did not make sense and Redundancy becons.

    The party as part of the coalition is now reduced to asking people to vote PD so he can return to office a man whom Mc Dowell believes is a liar. There is not a democracy on earth where the Deputy Prime Minister would still be in office after such a comment. Surely Aherne should have sacked him. How can the Taoiseach have confidence in a minister who calls him a liar. It undermines the office of Taoiseach that he should accept this.

  5. #25
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    12,454

    Quote Originally Posted by FutureTaoiseach
    Well the PDs are in trouble. The indications are that they will lose seats.
    Like in 2002.
    Yes but in 2002, the PDs had a partner in government and benefited from the vote transfers. Now without those transfers, how will the PDs do? Care to play with the PDs' crystal balls and hazard a guess FT?

    Regards...jmcc

  6. #26
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,764

    well future moron hasnt answered the questions.....again.....but then why should he when his snivelling arguments are so indefensible?

    at least this whole affair settles one thing:

    the pds will not be in government in 4 weeks time!!!!!

  7. #27
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,015

    look for macdowel to resign as party leader to make way for lovely liz after the debacle that this election is gonna be.

    TBH he shouldve pulled out at the last bertie gate scandal because most of the vote they got in 02 was to be the watchdog against FF . that credibility was completly shot last year and now its time to reap the whirlwind.

    ok they wouldve taken a pounding anyway but at least they wouldve had the moral high ground and the respect that comes with it. now he just looks like the byatch of bertie who'll but up with anything to stay in power.

    the PDs will be decimated, liz will take over, and the party will be lost in the desert for about a decade before any sembalance of its former glory comes back. and thats if they dont just call it quits and fold into FF/FG.

    its amazing to see how much damage micky ds caused in so little time

  8. #28
    Politics.ie Member FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dept. of FutureTaoiseach
    Posts
    39,825

    Quote Originally Posted by constitutionus
    look for macdowel to resign as party leader to make way for lovely liz after the debacle that this election is gonna be.

    TBH he shouldve pulled out at the last bertie gate scandal because most of the vote they got in 02 was to be the watchdog against FF . that credibility was completly shot last year and now its time to reap the whirlwind.

    ok they wouldve taken a pounding anyway but at least they wouldve had the moral high ground and the respect that comes with it. now he just looks like the byatch of bertie who'll but up with anything to stay in power.

    the PDs will be decimated, liz will take over, and the party will be lost in the desert for about a decade before any sembalance of its former glory comes back. and thats if they dont just call it quits and fold into FF/FG.

    its amazing to see how much damage micky ds caused in so little time
    Most of the vote we got in 2002 was on the basis of support for our candidates - not simply to be a watchdog. Evidence? In a study of "How Ireland Voted 2002", about 40% of the electorate who voted apparently voted on the basis of the candidate, including 78% (thereabouts) of PD voters. That bodes well I believe.

    It is extremely arrogant for other parties and their lackies to claim that their parties alone are supported for their policies, whereas everyone who votes for us is only doing so in spite of ours. It does not stand up to close scrutiny. If it were true we wouldn't have survived as long as we did.

    Yes but in 2002, the PDs had a partner in government and benefited from the vote transfers. Now without those transfers, how will the PDs do? Care to play with the PDs' crystal balls and hazard a guess FT?
    Excuse me but the votes haven't even been cast yet and we have not pulled out of this govt.

  9. #29
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    14,015

    bollocks, the party was going into meltdown till macdowel went up that poll to protest against an overall majority. the PDs cant pull that trick again so its decimation time

  10. #30
    Politics.ie Member FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dept. of FutureTaoiseach
    Posts
    39,825

    Quote Originally Posted by constitutionus
    bollocks, the party was going into meltdown till macdowel went up that poll to protest against an overall majority. the PDs cant pull that trick again so its decimation time
    People don't need an excuse to vote PD we have policies duh.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Catholic control of schooling untenable -- Diarmaid Martin
    By Toland in forum Education & Science
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: 18th June 2009, 07:06 PM
  2. Is Peter Robinsons position as First Minister untenable?
    By Amach na Casca in forum Northern Ireland
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 1st November 2008, 11:10 AM
  3. Will Lucinda take McDowell's seat?
    By apkavanagh in forum Dublin
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: 27th May 2007, 02:10 PM
  4. McDowell's figures don't add up?
    By Maximus in forum Progressive Democrats
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21st September 2006, 01:16 AM
  5. McDowell's sense of priorities
    By UnrepentantFenian in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 14th September 2005, 08:47 PM