Now I know people will give me stick for posting an article from the BNP's website -I was searching for articles pertaining to their recent membership woes -but I thought this was rather amusing.

Kurdish Asylum Invader Wins Court Review after Having His Genitals Examined

In June this year, the expert said that A was around 15-and-a-half years, basing her conclusions on his sexual, physical and mental development, his physical growth and his teeth. Among the factors which Dr Birch took into account was how hairy A is, how deep his voice is — and the size of his genitalia.

However, in October 2008, Croydon ruled that A was 17 — meaning that they believe he turned 18 earlier this month — and rejected Dr Birch’s findings. At London’s High Court, Judge Stephen Morris QC said Croydon had acted “unreasonably” in coming to the conclusion it did.

“The reasons given by the local authority were unsound,” said Judge Morris, stating its rejection of Dr Birch’s report was “irrational. Had Croydon given proper consideration to Dr Birch’s report, the outcome of the decision may well have been different,” added the judge.

Judge Morris said that Croydon had relied on a March assessment of A, but the reasoning in that report was “relatively superficial” and its conclusion “vague.” Granting the application for judicial review, Judge Morris said Croydon should now reconsider A’s claim to be a vulnerable child

Article lifted almost verbatim from the Croydon Guardian

So he may in fact be 18 years of age -but has a sufficiently small penis that allows him to claim benefit. Uh oh!