You completely missed the point. At present women are already entitled to 26 weeks paid maternity leave, and 16 weeks unpaid. I'm not proposing that the fathers get the same again, I'm suggesting that it be shared between both parents. In fact the total available paid leave that I proposed comes to 24 weeks, so if anything, it should be cheaper.
The scenario you outline is one that is already happening, and what my suggestion is supposed to redress. Instead of females of child-bearing age being silently passed over, any man would become as much a potential liability for the employer. If anybody comes out of it better off, it would be older women unlikely to have any more children.
So I'm not adding *any* cost whatsoever, except employers who in the past chose a man over a woman will find that he no longer has the surety he thought he did.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote