From the Telegraph:
SDLP and SF clash over justice minister plans - Politics, News - Belfasttelegraph.co.uk
I think this is an interesting dilemma that really highlights the problems/benefits of compromise. SF wants devolution (of course), and is willing to play ball to get it, even though it would mean handing it to an Alliance member (as opposed to SDLP). They say it's temporary, but unionists say lots of things. Anyone remember when devolution was actually supposed to have happened by? Is there any reason to believe that a nationalists would ever get their hands on that seat, once it was given to a unionist? Would unionist controlled justice be better for nationalists than non-devolved justice?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

