Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: I strongly believe in the 1916 Proclamation, why not you?

  1. #41
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Swords
    Posts
    1,645

    Quote Originally Posted by Mise_Eire
    Quote Originally Posted by farnaby
    The proclamation contains one great, timeless statement that should be the guiding principle of this state:

    The Republic guarantees religious and civil liberty, equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens, and declares its resolve to pursue the happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and of all its parts, cherishing all the children of the nation equally, and oblivious of the differences carefully fostered by an alien government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past.
    The rest of it goes into territory that almost directly undermines this claim (the republic actually demanding the allegiance of the people it is supposed to serve?) - i find little else to inspire me that this is a truly great national document, especially given the division that came after independence.

    That aside, even if unionists saw this line alone as the principle of the irish republic, would they view the Republic in a better light? Their philosophy is one of the last bastions of belief in British superiority - too much equality in there for their liking.
    Shame about the dig at the unionist community in there .... and when one of the more sensible posters from the ROI cannot hide his hostility, you needn't wonder why the unionist community want to keep you lot at arms length.

    Certainly we feel our system is superior to yours - have a read at the B, B, Bertie thread ....
    Is it really controversial to state that unionist politics has its roots in a philosophy of British superiority, or a right-wing (in my definition = divisive among humanity) viewpoint? Wouldn't have thought so...

  2. #42
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,742

    Quote Originally Posted by farnaby
    Is it really controversial to state that unionist politics has its roots in a philosophy of British superiority, or a right-wing (in my definition = divisive among humanity) viewpoint? Wouldn't have thought so...
    I'm not complaining - the honesty about your hostility is like a breath of fresh air.

    if you had specified Unionist Politicians or Unionist politics, that would have been a different matter - But you used a broad brush on the unionist community.

    Obviously we feel our system is better than yours - that's what politics is all about, just as you feel a national republic is better .... But you showed that you harbour a deep resentment against my entire community. Which is very different.

  3. #43
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Swords
    Posts
    1,645

    Quote Originally Posted by Mise_Eire
    Quote Originally Posted by farnaby
    Is it really controversial to state that unionist politics has its roots in a philosophy of British superiority, or a right-wing (in my definition = divisive among humanity) viewpoint? Wouldn't have thought so...
    I'm not complaining - the honesty about your hostility is like a breath of fresh air.

    if you had specified Unionist Politicians or Unionist politics, that would have been a different matter - But you used a broad brush on the unionist community.

    Obviously we feel our system is better than yours - that's what politics is all about, just as you feel a national republic is better .... But you showed that you harbour a deep resentment against my entire community. Which is very different.
    As i understand it unionism is a political concept, so i don't see that i've made anything approaching a racial slur on your community (cue Northern protestants i've known, marrying a protestant etc. ok better not). I just honestly think the statement i quoted from the republican proclamation is anathema to the current unionist centre (primarily DUP-voting these days, no?) in its statements of equality of rights and opportunities, and that this is a bad position for that movement and anyone who believes in it to take.

  4. #44
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,742

    As long as you specify politics, fair enough.

    I do find the whole equality thing a bit dubious though - we have equality.
    It was there to be taken from the days of NICRA getting their demands met and Sunningdale. Equality - genuine equality - isn't an issue.

    What IS an issue is that there is no chance that the unionist/protestant community will ever concede that Terrorists and Murderers such as Gerry Kelly, Sean Kelly, John Whyte or Mad Dog Adair are our equals. They are scum.

  5. #45
    Politics.ie Regular caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    676

    The heart of unionism is fear. Fear of the "one settler, one bullet approach" favoured by "physical force republicanism". No surrender and no, no, no are all we can ever come up with because - well its worked so far.
    With times things might change. If the perceived threat to the protestant community diminished with time you might see attitudes change. Ulster prods have more interest in a united Ireland than you might think.

  6. #46
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Swords
    Posts
    1,645

    Quote Originally Posted by caulfield
    With times things might change. If the perceived threat to the protestant community diminished with time you might see attitudes change. Ulster prods have more interest in a united Ireland than you might think.
    Do you mean Ulster prods see the benefits of a UI, but see obstacles to being entirely comfortable in it so don't discuss it; or they don't see this but should?

    If the former, tell us more (unless it's a UI within the UK...). The latter is, I believe, a common nationalist position especially in these Celtic Tiger days - I certainly believe it but have no northern connections to test against.

  7. #47
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,234

    Quote Originally Posted by Cael
    The selling off of Aer Lingus will be another nail in the coffin for the idea of the resources of Ireland belonging to the people of Ireland.
    Oh god this socialist nonsense is really getting nauseating now. Look the resources of this island are not going to be seized and shipped of to some other land, the market exists so it will be provided for and hopefully with better value and effieceny than at present.
    Life is a beautiful magnificent thing, even to a jelly fish ~ Charlie Chaplin

  8. #48
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,620

    You gotta love this convenient notion that force withheld is in a different category, morally speaking, from force actually used. Like we wouldn't have seen "physical force unionism" if the shoe had been on the other foot at the time of partition. It seems to me that the very existence and survival of the entity, from the Ulster Covenant on, is predicated on the willingness to use and to threaten force. What else is meant by " using all means which may be found necessary to defeat the present conspiracy to set up a Home Rule Parliament in Ireland"? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Covenant)

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 5th April 2008, 08:51 PM
  2. FG finish campaign strongly and will surprise on Thursday...
    By Political_Hardball in forum Fine Gael
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 23rd May 2007, 12:30 PM
  3. Replies: 153
    Last Post: 26th September 2006, 03:30 PM
  4. 1916 Proclamation
    By bikko in forum Sinn Féin
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 31st October 2005, 01:53 AM