You're presenting the Orangeman's image of the OO as 'largely a social club', then compare your own children to the three Quinn boys who were burnt to death in mass disorder incited by that 'social club'.
That was done by the UVF, who you might recognise among bands that march with the Orange Order. They'd have marched together within hours of torching the Quinn's home. You'd have to have an appreciation of what the Orange Order is, besides a social club, to understand how that could happen.
What do you mean by ethos? It's rather vague compared to your particular objection to the GAA's constitution. The GAA have changed that constitution removing the bar on Crown forces which unionists objected to.
What moves have the Orange Order made towards 'being purely a social, religious and cultural society', have they removed a single objectionable article from their rules and qualifications? They've been discussed extensively here, have you ever suggested they should reform any part of those rules and qualifications?
Comparing 'strengthening of the National Identity in a 32 County Ireland' to fascist aims (by dubious analogy), displaying a divisive and inappropriate aims, and an objectionable exclusive nationalism is rather different approach than that you take to the Orange Order: You present them as largely a social club (in it's own member terms), and continuing to move towards being purely a social, religious and cultural society.
If you're concerned about the children like Jason, Richard and Mark Quinn, try to think of the GAA as 'largely a social club' devoted to Gaelic sports (which it is) and get real about the Orange Order.



39Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote