Originally Posted by Desperate Dan

You and Picador are the right pair of tossers. The young girl is dead and you guys are fighting over the Dictionary. Get a life.

Picador is trying to sanitise her murder by giving it a smattering of legitimacy by describing it as an assasination - just as Ren tried to rewrite history by claiming she was accidentally killed in "crossfire".

Originally Posted by Ifor Bach

Fair enough.

Tom Elliot's description of the nationalist electorate was broadly correct so.

Outrage concerning well-paid public positions being given to murderers is hardly 'manufactured' or 'faux'.

Ifpr, do you have the Same beliefs for murderers within RUC,Brit Army and Brit spooks ?

Originally Posted by Desperate Dan

You and Picador are the right pair of tossers. The young girl is dead and you guys are fighting over the Dictionary. Get a life.

To state that Mary Travers was 'assassinated' rather than 'murdered' minimises the crime.

Originally Posted by Northtipp

Ifpr, do you have the Same beliefs for murderers within RUC,Brit Army and Brit spools ?

Yes.

Murder is murder, irrespective of by whom it is committed.

Originally Posted by Cruimh

Picador is trying to sanitise her murder by giving it a smattering of legitimacy by describing it as an assasination - just as Ren tried to rewrite history by claiming she was accidentally killed in "crossfire".

Exactly.

Originally Posted by Ifor Bach

Yes.

Murder is murder, irrespective of by whom it is committed.

And all those who remain within the govts pay. What should happen to them?

Originally Posted by Ifor Bach

Exactly.

Imagine the screams of outrage from the same posters here if the murderers of Pat Finucane had chosen to shoot one of his kids dead at the same time - and a Unionist described the child as being killed in an assassination attempt - or that the child was caught in crossfire ... and then the murderer was subsequently rewarded with a cushy sinecure to a prominent unionist politician .....

Originally Posted by Cruimh

Imagine the screams of outrage from the same posters here if the murderers of Pat Finucane had chosen to shoot one of his kids dead at the same time - and a Unionist described the child as being killed in an assassination attempt - or that the child was caught in crossfire ... and then the murderer was subsequently rewarded with a cushy sinecure to a prominent unionist politician .....

Respectfully, how Do you know some of them have not already? Do you know who killed PF or as importantly, colluded in his death.

Originally Posted by Ifor Bach

Fair enough.

Tom Elliot's description of the nationalist electorate was broadly correct so.

Outrage concerning well-paid public positions being given to murderers is hardly 'manufactured' or 'faux'.

No, Tom Elliot is a hypocrite and is sectarian. He saw no problem at all in endorsing a convicted unionist murderer in the Court ward for Belfast City Council. That murderer was standing for Elliots' party.

Originally Posted by Northtipp

And all those who remain within the govts pay. What should happen to them?

As I said, murder is murder.

If anyone employed by the government commits murder then they should face charges in the same manner as everyone else.