The facts of the hunger strikes have already been established

[the dark angel]

Would that DA was merely a random looper. S/he is engaging in an agenda driven campaign to smear me for challenging the PSF narrative, it's rather pathetic and inconsequential compared with the author of the letter contained in the OP being driven from her home with her husband and small children after a protracted intimidation campaign which saw the family home surrounded by aggressive picketers. Richard O Rawe has had his reputation and character slandered and assassinated since he went public with the truth.

DA's comrade Picador has willfully participated in the counter-productive and infantile smear campaign. His actions are in contrast to the declared shinner of the triumverate, Pat McLarnon who at least has the wit to know when to say nothing. There will have been shockwaves over Picador's blabbing of the PSF propaganda management strategy, as evidenced by his frantic backpeddling and attempts to obscure.

The truth is there, it's becoming increasingly apparent and easy to determine as we cut through the spin, concealment and lies emanating from PSF quarters. The most comprehensive archive of material relevant to the debate can be found here - July 1981

You wouldn't know the truth if you MI5 handler wrote it on your tout money. So what about Bap your other TOUT buddy? Does he tell the truth two??

[picador]

Marvelous Picador, now tell us where you heard this:

Mention of the message and the fact that prisoners had discussed it was omitted from Ten Men Dead to prevent contemporary and future enemies of the emerging Adams-McGuinness leadership from making precisely the sort of accusations and insinuations that are being thrown around now

As previously stated it is pure conjecture on my part. And given that it's a long time since I read Ten Men Dead it's foolish conjecture as well.

Then explain why you have been participating in the agenda-driven smear campaign against me over the last couple of days.

I started a thread about Kevin McQuillan which you insisted on hijacking because part of my post suggested his recollections of the hunger-strikes might now be subject to question. The same bile was forthcoming when I started a thread on the recent Ruairí Ó Brádaigh interview. On that occasion it was the journalist who was subject to slander.

[the_beat]

As previously stated it is pure conjecture on my part. And given that it's a long time since I read Ten Men Dead it's foolish conjecture as well.

And yet another example of pic and his meandering waffle and lies. The following statement from you is most obviously not conjecture on your part.

Mention of the message and the fact that prisoners had discussed it was omitted from Ten Men Dead to prevent contemporary and future enemies of the emerging Adams-McGuinness leadership from making precisely the sort of accusations and insinuations that are being thrown around now

You`re quite good at trying to divert from meaningful discussion and reality. Just not good enough pup.

[Katayusha Mk2]

As previously stated it is pure conjecture on my part. And given that it's a long time since I read Ten Men Dead it's foolish conjecture as well.

What's it got to do with reading 10 Men Dead; you talked about what was 'omitted' from the book; not what was in it. You said there was a cover up, the truth was with held. You've done a dishonest little dance since then. attempting to deny it. I can remind you what you wrote again if you want to be a complete gobsh1te.

I started a thread about Kevin McQuillan which you insisted on hijacking because part of my post suggested his recollections of the hunger-strikes might now be subject to question.

Liar. I clearly stated that McQuillan was largely irrelevant to the overall debate. McQuillan wasn't negotiating with Thatcher or making decisions based on the negotiations.

The same bile was forthcoming when I started a thread on the recent Ruairí Ó Brádaigh interview. On that occasion it was the journalist who was subject to slander.

You mean the interview which Ruairí Ó Brádaigh had to follow with a letter of clarification due to the extent to which he was taken out of context. I seem to remember frantic scrabblings on your part.

[the dark angel]

What's it got to do with reading 10 Men Dead; you talked about what was 'omitted' from the book; not what was in it. You said there was a cover up, the truth was with held. You've done a dishonest little dance since then. attempting to deny it. I can remind you what you wrote again if you want to be a complete gobsh1te.



[SIZE="4"]Liar[/SIZE]. I clearly stated that McQuillan was largely irrelevant to the overall debate. McQuillan wasn't negotiating with Thatcher or making decisions based on the negotiations.



You mean the interview which Ruairí Ó Brádaigh had to follow with a letter of clarification due to the extent to which he was taken out of context. I seem to remember frantic scrabblings on your part.

THE IRONY!!

[Katayusha Mk2]

THE IRONY!!

A damning indictment of 'care in the community'.

No doubt it would be way too much to expect that you could back your post up with some relevant quotes or references. Maybe you should email admin and see about uploading one of your crayon drawings instead.

[the dark angel]

A damning indictment of 'care in the community'.

No doubt it would be way too much to expect that you could back your post up with some relevant quotes or references. Maybe you should email admin and see about uploading one of your crayon drawings instead.

MI5 let you out on your own again??

[Katayusha Mk2]

MI5 let you out on your own again??

How many of these men were party to the July 1981 negotiations with the British?

[the dark angel]

How many of these men were party to the July 1981 negotiations with the British?

I see the other MI5 tout Donaldson in that picture. Do you miss your buddie?

[minstrelboy]

Is the guy with the beard an American? Kenny Rodgers perhaps?