Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: Brendan O'Connor Libels Alan Shatter - S. Indo Pays Up

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    951

    Brendan O'Connor Libels Alan Shatter - S. Indo Pays Up

    Brendan O'Connor Libels Alan Shatter - Sunday Indo Pays Up

    The Sunday Independent today was forced to publish a lenghty letter from legal representatives of Fine Gael T.D. Alan Shatter, together with an article saying sorry to Mr Shatter.

    This relates to one of Brendan O'Connor's (endless) Ahern lovefest articles in which he (wrongly) stated that Alan Shatter had represented Ms M Ahern in a previous legal action.

    The article, according to Shatters legal representative, defamed him on a number of points.

    The Sunday Independent apologised for Brendan O'Connors article and agreed to pay sums to charities of Mr Shatters choice.

    The letter that the Sunday Independent was forced to publish:

    We are writing to you in connection with the following passage which appeared in the Sunday Independent on 30th September, 2007, in an article written by Brendan O'Connor:


    "And as people watched Enda Kenny having a go, flanked by Alan Shatter, who represented Miriam Ahern in her separation, it all seemed a little bit grubby. It just wasn't like us. It had a touch of the gutter about it."

    The next paragraph contained the following: "better to be a mouthpiece for Ahern than for whatever unholy alliance of sinister forces and provos are lined up against Ahern"

    The contents of these passages are grossly defamatory of Mr Shatter who is a partner in this firm and impugn his professional integrity. They imply that he became privy in his professional capacity as a solicitor to information concerning a matrimonial conflict between estranged spouses that was subsequently disclosed by him to a third party and expressly describe his alleged conduct in derogatory terms.

    Mr Shatter as a solicitor, together with the other partners and solicitors of this firm is bound to observe the principle of solicitor and client confidentiality. Mr Shatter when dealing with family law litigation, like all family law solicitors, is also required to observe the in camera rule, which prohibits the disclosure of information or documentation concerning an individual's matrimonial proceedings. The express and implied allegations made are damaging to Mr Shatter's professional standing and reputation as well as to that of the other partners and solicitors of this firm.

    As a result of public comment made by some clients of this firm, it is generally known that Gallagher Shatter, and Mr Shatter personally, have, over the years, represented many well-known and prominent Irish people or their spouses in family law proceedings. However, to preserve confidentiality Mr Shatter himself never publicly reveals without authorisation whether he has or has not represented a particular client and has never used in his public life confidential information obtained by him in his capacity as a solicitor in a matrimonial matter to embarrass, to cause harm to or to diminish the reputation of any individual either represented by him or this firm or of any individual with whom any client of this firm has been in conflict. The implication that he would do so in relation to the matrimonial matters of Miriam Ahern and Bertie Ahern, TD is gravely damaging.

    The issue of what solicitor or firm of solicitors represented which party in family law proceedings is from a solicitor's perspective, bound by the obligation of confidentiality. Accordingly, it would be inappropriate for us to comment on the statement in Brendan O'Connor's article that Mr Shatter represented Miriam Ahern in her matrimonial proceedings. It is, of course, open to Miriam Ahern or with her agreement, Bertie Ahern, TD to identify the lawyers who represented each of them. This would clarify whether the statement made in the Sunday Independent that our Mr Shatter acted for Miriam Ahern is true or false.

    What you printed in your newspaper was grossly defamatory of Mr Shatter and the partners and solicitors of this firm. We call upon you to publish this letter in full in next Sunday's edition of your newspaper, together with an apology (in a form agreed in advance with this firm) with appropriate prominence.

    Yours truly,

    Brian M Gallagher,

    Managing Partner,

    Gallagher Shatter Solicitors.

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,274

    no harm to see muttonhead o'connor taken down a peg or two

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Regular Abaddon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,467

    How often do newspapers in this country libel people? The only reason this rag published an apology was that they knew that they couldn't bully Alan Shatter and that He could afford to take them to court.
    IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR A FIGHT, YOU'VE COME TO THE RIGHT SITE = P.ie - Brings out the worst in people!

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    951

    Not only does Shatter have the dough, but O'Connor defamed his legal practice as well.

    The twat wont be so care free in writing his articles from now on.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,728

    To be fair to Mr Shatter I wouldnt share his politics but he has an excellent reputation in the world of legal seperations nice to see him seperating sir anto from some of his lucre.

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,027

    Quote Originally Posted by the-analyst2007
    Not only does Shatter have the dough, but O'Connor defamed his legal practice as well.

    The twat wont be so care free in writing his articles from now on.
    Compared to the massive libel perpetrated on the Taoiseach by FG's sorry flakmen in the botched Sindo briefcase smear (Kenny: 'This is going to be big'), I'd say the damage to Shatter's reputation was slight.

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    111

    Can anybody believe what they read in the Sunday Indo. It beats me why people buy it - it must be for its death notices!

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Clare
    Posts
    3,451

    Quote Originally Posted by polkate
    Can anybody believe what they read in the Sunday Indo. It beats me why people buy it - it must be for its death notices!
    Have you seen it lately? it's breadroll man's News of the World. Good bit of skin in it, the old Skindo.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,552

    Great to see that talentless buffoon have to eat humble pie. Hopefully Sir AJ will now tire of his juvenile slobberings and get him a job as a doorman in Spirit.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    41

    Went for a dreary lunch in an establishment today in Drogheda. The staff dropped 4 coffees at different times, once over a nun! They were giving free copies of the Sunday Independent. I suppose people only read it when it's free or there is nothing on the telly, or if they're looking for a new job

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 101
    Last Post: 27th February 2011, 01:09 PM
  2. Thanks, Alan Shatter
    By myksav in forum Fine Gael
    Replies: 147
    Last Post: 15th January 2009, 12:40 PM
  3. Alan Shatter could be Bertie's Nemesis
    By Hibernophile in forum Justice
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12th February 2008, 03:24 PM
  4. Alan Shatter struggling ?
    By knack in forum Dublin
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25th May 2007, 11:18 PM
  5. Alan Shatter is an idiot
    By salt in forum Fine Gael
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11th May 2006, 02:22 PM