Yes Campaign Funding

[CookieMonster]

Are you a gay bloke?

He appears to think I am one too. It's a little disturbing.

[ibis]

Are you a gay bloke?

No, but I'm occasionally queenly.

[myksav]

CM, you are breaking two Commandments, stop it, you might go the hell.
12th: Thou shalt not ask questions like that of the Yes campaign.
14th: Thou shalt not ask questions like that of the Yes campaign.

[CookieMonster]

CM, you are breaking two Commandments, stop it, you might go the hell.
12th: Thou shalt not ask questions like that of the Yes campaign.
14th: Thou shalt not ask questions like that of the Yes campaign.

I know, they don't seem to like it at all. But with reps like Cox and Sutherland and lovely innocent and transparent organisations like Generation Yes and Bridget Laffan for Europe what do they have to fear?

It's not like they have anything to hide, is it?

[Iwasfrozen]

And you appear to be the definition if idiot. There was one loan which was a bona fide loan and there is no issue with the rest of the funding. I know you don't want it to be true, but it is.

Hence why it's called secret funding.

Which he, what with all his millions and influential connections up the yinyang could easily have done with or without Lisbon.

Nope, he needed an untapped voterbase and the unrepresented Euroskeptics where a perfect choice.

A goal which only appeared after it was very obvious that there would be a second vote on Lisbon. It was what three days later when Sarko was off telling us to vote again.

Lisbon II had little or nothing to do with Ganely's potential seat.

Liking it is one thing, actually having it is another. But the never seemed to shy away from making wild accusations again and again without a shread of proof. They were also adept that keeping quiet things which disproved their nonsense.

What has disproved my nonsense ?

The first of two abortion referendums was taken in 1983 and the second in 2002. That's 19 years apart.
The first Lisbon referendum was held last year and we within a week we knew there would be a second one. The questions asked in each of those referendums were also vastly different to eachother.

Hence why I said by your logic.

[Ah Well]

On their Website, Generation Yes state that they get no Government or EU funding and that funds come from donations from "supporters" - begs the question who exactly fall within the remit of "supporters"

http://www.generationyes.ie/faq/

[CookieMonster]

Hence why it's called secret funding.

It's not secret.

Nope, he needed an untapped voterbase and the unrepresented Euroskeptics where a perfect choice.

Shame he's not a eurosceptic himself though, isn't it.

Lisbon II had little or nothing to do with Ganely's potential seat.

You really don't know what you're on about then, do you? The inevitability of Lisbon 2 was the reason he did what he did.

What has disproved my nonsense ?

You seem to have difficulty reading.

Hence why I said by your logic.[/QUOTE]
My logic has nothing to do with it. The facts are there. There was 19 years between the two referendums and the questions that were asked were vastly different.

The situation we have at the moment is that there was less than a week when it became clear that we'd have another referendum and the question being asked is exactly the same as the last time.

I never said that I had an issue with referendums. It's quite clear to most people that the issue here is the fact that the intention to have a second referendum on the same isssue so soon after the first. It's clearly a ridiculous state of affairs.

[fingolfin]

Now now Iwasfrozen. Cookie Monster is right and thats that.

[CookieMonster]

Now now Iwasfrozen. Cookie Monster is right and thats that.

Quiet, blobby.

[fingolfin]

Clearly your insults are as tragic as your reasons for voting No.