Page 24 of 24 FirstFirst ... 14222324
Results 231 to 239 of 239

Thread: Ganley Pulls out of Lisbon Debate

  1. #231
    Politics.ie Regular Bobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sesame Street
    Posts
    12,324

    Quote Originally Posted by draiocht23
    PROINSIAS DE ROSSA has just released this press release -

    'GANLEY FEARS RATIONAL DEBATE’

    - Ganley had no problem sharing platform with SF at 6 March NUIG debate

    Labour MEP for Dublin Proinsias De Rossa has accused anti-Lisbon campaigner Declan Ganley of Libertas, of running away from a rational debate on the Lisbon treaty. The debate takes place in the National Forum on Europe on 3 April.

    “Declan Ganley knows his case is deeply flawed and will not stand up to examination. The unspoken reason the likes of Mr Ganley does not want Lisbon to be ratified is that the Lisbon Treaty improves democratic decision-making, enhances the social dimension of Europe, and gives more weight to workers’ and consumers’ rights.

    “His excuse for running away from this debate is that he is being asked to share a platform with Sinn Fein, but Mr.Ganley had absolutely no problem sharing a platform with SF at a debate on Lisbon organised by the NUI Galway Literary and Debating Society on 6 March. I know, because I also took part in that debate. Indeed it was remarkable how close the superficial arguments made by Sinn Fein and Mr Ganley coincided on that occasion, even down to their use of a common slogan, i.e. ‘Ireland deserves better’.

    “Mr Ganley clearly realises that his wild claims will not stand up to forensic scrutiny in the National Forum on Europe where he will not be able to engage in the tearful amateur dramatics that he has engaged in so far at public meetings around the country.”

    Hello everyone, first of, my name is Robert, although, Bob, Bobert, and even Bert are acceptable. This is my first post and first chance to exercise my vote in my first referendum. I will do, and so far have done, traveled to every single debate and discussion within my locality, and by locality I mean the county of Galway. I was in attendance at the debate Mr. DeRossa has mentioned.

    I looked at the front of the lecture hall used by the Lit & Deb society after having arrived (First one there.) Unsure of which side would be sitting on either side, I sat in the middle. Perhaps sub-consciously I was unsure of my own standing in this argument.

    The debate was late starting due to the tardiness of Mr. DeRossa. He was seated on the left of the theatre, alongside Professor Helen Wallace a Economics professor from the London School of Economics. On the right side of the theatre, was Declan Ganley of Libertas, and to his right, sat Shannon Brooke Murphy, policy writer for Sinn Fein.

    Ms. Murphy began firstly by introducing herself in French, English and as any Sinner would, in Irish. She went on to outline Sinn Fein's reasons for opposition to this treaty. She then made a point I took issue with. It was to do with a Sinn Fein policy regarding worker's rights. I can't recall the statement, but, from having come into possession of a Sinn Fein document concerning policy, I noticed she made a slip up. (A biscuit for whoever can tell me what Ms. Murphy's position is).

    Next was Professor Helen Wallace. She began by introducing herself. Speaking with an English Accent, she went on to tell us of her tin whistle playing brother from Tuam, when suddenly, a voice rang out from the audience, a heckler ; "Enough about your family, talk about Europe.". The chairperson, a true professional, demanded order, warned the audience that heckling would not be tolerated, and then allowed the lady to continue. Earlier that day, I read in the NUIG print, "Sin", an article that made the point that, since joining the Eurozone, over forty billion EURO has been lost from the ISEQ Index. It wasn't mentioned. Earlier that week, Westminster had turned refused to hold a referendum on Lisbon. She made the point that we were fortunate to be in a country that was bound by it's constitution to hold a referendum. I couldn't have agreed with her more on that single point. Sadly, the rest went to pot.

    Mr. DeRossa, arose, said his piece, despite being jibbed and jeered. I have little to say about Mr. DeRossa's speech as I found it dull. However, throughout it, Declan Ganley seemed to scoff, scowl and pass notes to Ms. Murphy, who also had a jolly good giggle. Now, I have read here, several times in fact, that one should get used to name calling if one is to be involved in politics. But, when you have two grown men, one a distinguished MEP, the other an international capitalist, argue and sulk in the same ways I saw my fellow Secondary School students argue, you almost feel like both arguments are irrelavent.

    "Don't be fooled; Declan Ganley has his own personal interests in opposing this treaty." said Mr. DeRossa.

    Ganley sprung from his seat, held out his right hand, pointed at DeRossa, and waited, waited for three solid minutes of DeRossa's monologue and then sat. DeRossa wouldn't let him speak.

    Seated three rows behind my, was the Libertas Executive Director, Noaise Nunn. I glanced at him, he appeared unmoved.

    Ganley's turn came around. Ganley, like the anonymous professor, has an English accent. But, his was more welcomed by the audience. He took the podium, carrying with him his infamous yellow folder. Which "Contains the original Treaty of Lisbon your government signed. The one they don't want you to read." he declared.

    Turning to his right, he looked DeRossa in the eyes, and said, without looking away, "Mr. DeRossa is right. I do have a personal interest in this treaty." I expected a sudden gasp from the audience but none came. "My interest is this; I am a patriot, I love my country. I love Europe. I think Ireland has done well under Europe." Had there been a gasp, I'm sure there would've been a "Aww" at the lack of a more sinister motive.

    He went on to tell us of how he traveled Europe, building businesses, saw first hand the benefits Europe offered. This was followed by his declaration that Ireland could do better under this Treaty. "This is our chance to tell the Government to go back to Europe and have them "give us a better product we can sell. We can't sell this."

    Then came the Vetoe argument, he spoke of us loosing our veto. He claimed that, although we hadn't ever had to use it. It always gave us a strong hand at the poker table that is Brussels. He finished up by looking into, and pointing into the audience whilst declaring

    "This affects your democracy, and your democracy, and your democracy." One of those fingers was pointed at me.

    He sat down beside Ms. Murphy again. With great anticipation, I awaited the Q&A from the audience. As I feel I've gone on long enough, I'll only mention the most significant quotes.

    "You will NOT invoke the ghosts of my ancestors who fought in 1916!" A student angry at the mentioning of the erosion of the Proclamation of 1916.

    "Nokia, has eradicated over a hundred jobs at a factory in Germany. This was in a year Nokia made a record profit. It is a result of the greed of business men like Declan Ganley." An elderly gentleman whom I doubt to have been a student.

    "No thank you." A rather powerful civil engineering student who said he had no position as of yet. The "No thank you." was in relation to questions being put to him by his peers."

    "Ah yeah, good man." A phrase from a very sarcastic Declan Ganley addressed to Mr. DeRossa who made a jibe against Mr. Ganley

    "Nah." The final cry from the audience.

    Thank you.

    *As this debate was held some time ago, I feel I should make the point that there is a chance that these quotes aren't accurate. I cannot entirely recall the night.
    Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them.

    - [SIZE=2]Niccolò Machiavelli[/SIZE]

  2. #232
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    531

    Quote Originally Posted by ibis
    I think that really is a different point. It would be the same if, say, Labour were saying that they were pleased with the Treaty because it ushered in the glorious dawn of the workers' paradise,...
    Little chance of the Labour Party even asking for that, unfortunately.

  3. #233
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    23,605

    Quote Originally Posted by spartacus
    Quote Originally Posted by ibis
    I think that really is a different point. It would be the same if, say, Labour were saying that they were pleased with the Treaty because it ushered in the glorious dawn of the workers' paradise,...
    Little chance of the Labour Party even asking for that, unfortunately.
    It's probably not Europe's most socialist socialist party...but then Ireland hasn't had all that much of an industrial proletariat to work with.
    Never let the best be the enemy of the good.

  4. #234
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    D4
    Posts
    1,751

    How on earth has this topic gone on for 10 pages?
    The standard of excellence is an infinite suggestiveness, naturalism is the one thing to be condemned.

  5. #235
    Politics.ie Regular Bobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sesame Street
    Posts
    12,324

    I don't know, but I'm enjoying the read.
    Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them.

    - [SIZE=2]Niccolò Machiavelli[/SIZE]

  6. #236
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    50

    Quote Originally Posted by The Collective.
    From my understanding McQuirk is also a Libertas supporter.
    from my understanding he loves to stir the pot

  7. #237
    Politics.ie Regular Bobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sesame Street
    Posts
    12,324

    Oh? You mean in ways other then Letters to the Editor?
    Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them.

    - [SIZE=2]Niccolò Machiavelli[/SIZE]

  8. #238
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    50

    [quote=Kate P]
    Quote Originally Posted by ibis
    Quote Originally Posted by myk
    Quote Originally Posted by "Kate P":wkm035n9
    All of which ignores the fact that the Yes side are also calling for a yes vote, regardless.

    At the meeting in UCG Michael D Higgins said that the chief reason that they were supporting it was because of the Charter (!?) The Charter was effectively what had swung Labour to propose a yes vote.

    The FF blurb on the their new leaflet is, as far as I can see utterly disingenuous in its presentation of the Charter by excluding any reference to the context in which those rights operate.

    FG want us to vote yes but Enda didn't mention the charter at all at that meeting and John Cushnahan made a cursory reference to it at the Waterford Forum meeting.

    In that light it's clear to see that individual reasons for promoting a yes vote are not supported in the same way or with the same interpretation by all of the parties.
    ah fair point Kate, but have any campaigning groups on the Yes side refused to share a platform with another campaigning group on the Yes side? I think the answer is no, and part of the reason why is that there are no glaring inconsistencies between with the yes campaigns, at least not to the extent that there are on the No side.

    Another interesting point is that Sinn Fein have no difficulty sharing a platform with Libertas.
    I think that really is a different point. It would be the same if, say, Labour were saying that they were pleased with the Treaty because it ushered in the glorious dawn of the workers' paradise, and the PDs were saying they liked it because it would allow US multinationals to use slave labour in the mines of Thuringia (I'm exaggerating, but equally dramatic claims are being made by the loony fringe).

    However, there's no contradiction in Labour saying "we particularly like this bit", while FG says "we particularly like that bit". I wouldn't be even slightly surprised that FF is being disingenuous, of course.
    The difference lies in the fact, ibis that the Yes side are supportive of the Treaty as a whole and in general support their views with fluffy stuff like was quoted in the Times this morning as Pat the Cope Gallagher said that Lisbon would ensure the continuation of peace in Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals.

    The Yes side aren't obliged - or at least don't feel themselves obliged in the promotion of their argument to focus on individual aspects in the way that the No side are obliged to pick apart the inconsistencies - that's how the debate works. It's interesting though that the Labour perspective as shown by Michael D has very little to do with the Treaty but with the Charter whose rules, as I understand it, are already in force but will have legal underpinning with Lisbon.

    Is there anyone else out there saying, as Michael D does that Lisbon creates a better space for a more social Europe? FF aren't, that's for sure. One could argue that that's a far more fundamental difference than the variety of economic interpretations suggested by Libertas and SF.[/quote:wkm035n9]


    i think the arguments from sf and libertas are that it cedes too much power to unelected bodies and we lose too much power through the changing institutions. this could eventually lead to a harmonisation of tax rates if qmv is exercised and ireland loses a commisioner(this will hapen sooner or later). this bothers libertas. it also could lead to differnet labour laws being enforced and could erode workers rights this bothers sf. the same thing bothers them for different reasons.
    we should vote no, if only because of the commissioner, prionsias had fought for a different system and dick roche previously stated that the loss of a comissioner was unthinkable. this is a major issue. five years is a long time to be without a representative at the table, would a party be in coalition without a rep at the cabinet table? if little ireland can facillitate ministers and junior ministers then the monolith of the eu can take 27 commissioners.
    europe could create a better treaty, not just for ireland but for all member states.

  9. #239
    Politics.ie Member CookieMonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Fontvieille, Monaco.
    Posts
    37,127

    Quote Originally Posted by irishbeergirl


    i think the arguments from sf and libertas are that it cedes too much power to unelected bodies and we lose too much power through the changing institutions. this could eventually lead to a harmonisation of tax rates if qmv is exercised and ireland loses a commisioner(this will hapen sooner or later). this bothers libertas. it also could lead to differnet labour laws being enforced and could erode workers rights this bothers sf. the same thing bothers them for different reasons.
    we should vote no, if only because of the commissioner, prionsias had fought for a different system and dick roche previously stated that the loss of a comissioner was unthinkable. this is a major issue. five years is a long time to be without a representative at the table, would a party be in coalition without a rep at the cabinet table? if little ireland can facillitate ministers and junior ministers then the monolith of the eu can take 27 commissioners.
    europe could create a better treaty, not just for ireland but for all member states.
    Can you give me back my thoughts now, please.
    A poster of some consequence...

Page 24 of 24 FirstFirst ... 14222324

Similar Threads

  1. The Big Debate: Ganley vs Cohn-Bendit
    By zeleneye in forum Europe
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 17th April 2009, 04:39 PM
  2. Ganley "chickens out" of another Lisbon debate
    By mccafferty cat in forum Europe
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 25th August 2008, 07:39 AM
  3. Harney vs Ganley Debate
    By Ulster-Lad in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 7th June 2008, 12:32 PM
  4. TV3 Ganley-Sutherland debate now
    By FutureTaoiseach in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 27th May 2008, 03:26 PM
  5. TCD Hist debate on EU tonight, UKIP pulls out
    By David Cochrane in forum Lisbon Treaty
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 21st February 2008, 02:06 PM