Quote:
Originally Posted by livingstone
Whatever about Coughlan and Cowen - Lenihan and Sherlock I think are more than capable in their own rights and I certainly don't agree with the former very often. Likewise, Dick Spring was well capable in his own right.
Ultimately nepotism means very little when its the people who decide. If the people decide they want a former TD's nephew as a current TD, then that's their perogative. And I'd say that even when Ferris Junior runs ;-)
Ah look who has resurfaced! Livingstone!
You cant hit and run livingstone, you owe me answers from a few pages backs on this thread...
http://www.politics.ie/2614344-post217.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by livingstone
So, aside from stumbling over a couple of words (which at times sounded like a mild stammer) and saying disadvantaged instead of advantaged what precisely is wrong with this? When you leave out the selective transcribing which suggests that the poster doesn't really get the concept of punctuation.
You are so wrong livingstone, there were many major mistakes delivered by Arthur Spring at The Labour Party Conference;
1.) 'this is not a Government that is serious about education we’re the Government that’s serious about education'
2.) 'helping kids that are the least disadvantaged in Society'
3.) 'the Minister for Finance at one time that brought employment to an ever decreasing low'
4.) 'it is commonly acknowledged that our services are nothing shy of deplorable when compared with the rest of Europe'
Where? Romania? Slovenia? Latvia? Estonia? Lithuania?
5.) 'I'm happy to sanction'....
Selective transcribing? I don't think so livingstone - Read and simultaneously listen, the provided transcription was produced by a legal service for me.
It is exactly what Arthur Spring SAID.
You FAIL when you attempt to say it is inaccurate.
Its a pity that Arthur Springs CV wasnt as exact as the transcription of his speech at The Labour Party Conference