Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 77

Thread: 24 Hour Drinking

  1. #1
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    95

    24 Hour Drinking

    Sorry for the long post but this article from the BBC website seems to suggest that introducing '24 hour drinking' has not led to a huge increase in related social and crime problems. Does anybody else agree that whe should look at this area again?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Storm in a pint glass
    By Finlo Rohrer
    BBC News Magazine

    Six months ago pubs in England and Wales were given the right to open 24 hours a day - and drunken mayhem on the streets was widely forecast. So what happened next?

    Anyone reading press coverage of the run up to the act coming into force could be forgiven for being left with the impression that the edifice of British civilisation was about to crumble into the sea.

    The Conservatives led the last-ditch opposition to the law, with then shadow culture spokeswoman Theresa May warning of impending "chaos" sparked by changes "which will fuel even more violence and anti-social behaviour in the streets of Britain".

    They were not alone. The Lib Dems also voted to delay the changes, fearing a rise in binge drinking, while a slew of senior police officers, churchmen, doctors and alcohol campaigners expressed scepticism. Many newspapers made hay with the issue.

    There had been a wave of stories linking longer licensing hours to increased rapes, more deaths on the roads, massively increased binge drinking, more violence and casualty departments being overwhelmed.

    The Labour government had memorably pledged to tackle the age-old issue of drinking hours with a text sent to young voters reading: "Cldnt give a XXXX 4 lst ordrs? Vote Labour 4 extra time."

    But the idea that the government was pushing Britain towards "24-hr drinking" was derided by those in the drinks industry, and while it was assumed that every pub in the country would apply for markedly extended hours, this has not been the case.

    In many areas of the country, according to the councils responsible for licensing, and the industry itself, the norm is large numbers of pubs closing at midnight rather than 11pm and clubs and late bars closing at 3am instead of 2am. Most of the late opening is between Thursday and Sunday. While it's still too soon to make a definitive call on extended hours, last days of Rome it is not.


    Neil Williams from the British Beer and Pub Association says people might have noticed very little change.

    "There has been limited change in city centres. The new system is allowing people to stay in their favourite local pub for a little bit longer on certain nights rather than traipse into town to go to a bar."

    In Newcastle, for instance, there are now 200 premises serving after 11pm as opposed to 100 before the changes. But a city council spokesman insists many of the places with extended hours are in outlying areas reducing the flow of people into the city centre at weekends.

    In Leeds, out of 2,400 applications for licences, only 700 were for extended hours.

    Some newspapers predicted a last days of Rome scenario

    And a spokesman explains: "They are quite selective in when they choose to use them. You see places closed at 10.30 that you know can open much later."

    Of course, councils have an interest in promoting positive outcomes in their backyards. Nevertheless, it seems the chief aim of extending licencing hours, to stagger kicking out times, has had some success.

    Focusing on one city, it is possible to see a spread of closing times. If you were to go to Birmingham this Friday night, 1,336 premises would be licensed up to 11pm, with another 387 having to close at midnight. At 1am another 220 venues would have to close, with a further 290 able to open until 2am. There would be 40 having to close at 3am and 60 at 4am.

    But most of the measures used to judge the effect of the laws are anecdotal.

    People are not drinking any more - it just means people aren't lining up five pints at 11pm

    No definitive answer can be given on whether the Licensing Act has increased or decreased alcohol-related crime and disorder.

    West Yorkshire police says "it has definitely not seen a massive increase in incidents", Northumbria has experienced much the same, while at Merseyside Police some officers believe alcohol-related crime may have gone down.

    But the British Crime Survey, widely regarded as the most reliable measure of crime, will not be out until July, and will only cover the period up until the end of March.

    This will miss what many see as the real crucible for the laws, not Christmas, but the summer.

    Malcolm Moss, shadow minister with responsibility for licensing, insists: "It is still too soon to judge the real effects of licensing changes. The real test will be during the forthcoming months where a combination of the World Cup and hot summer nights could cause potential chaos for many people wanting to enjoy a quiet evening."

    And Alcohol Concern emphasises that a full statistical picture is needed before any judgements are made on whether drinking or violence has increased.

    "It is very much too early to tell. The only research into trends are generally annual studies, or occasionally every two years," says spokeswoman Helen Symonds.

    Even the Department for Culture Media and Sport is waiting before it declares the measures a success, but it is bullish about the other parts of the bill that allowed rogue pubs to have their licences withdrawn and gave more powers to police.

    There is a feeling in the drinks industry, again with a shortage of statistics, that consumption has not rocketed - a sentiment typified by Caroline Nodder, editor of trade magazine The Publican.

    "People are not drinking any more, they are spending the same amount of money overall. It just means people aren't lining up five pints at 11pm. People used to rush to the bar and down pints as quickly as possible," says Ms Nodder

    And there is anger over the media's coverage of the issue.

    "We ran a campaign to boycott the Daily Mail... the reports were based on complete misinformation. The premise was that the pub trade had forced the government to change the law."

    There are no definitive statistics on changes in consumption

    Critics and supporters of the changes alike are sure that Britain has a long way to go to fight the prevalence of weekend binge drinking and alcohol fuelled violence and move to a continental model.

    Go to a big Mediterranean city - like Valencia for example - and you will see crowds of revellers of all ages drinking late into the night at the weekend, without feeling that you are only a mistimed glance away from being glassed in the face.

    And even if things do improve, drinking into the early hours is not everybody's cup of tea.

    As Eddie Gershon, of pub chain Wetherspoons, notes: "There is only so much people wish to drink. Who in the middle of Dudley town centre wants a drink at four in the morning. Or anywhere else for that matter."

  2. #2
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    564

    I'm massively in favour of introducing 24 hour drinking although certain cranks in my party and the IVF are blind to the benefits! I think it was The Independent in February that showed that 3 months after being introduced in the UK violent crime had dropped 24%, stabbings 16% and drunken assaults 11%.

    Personally living in a country that has 24 hour liscensing and socialising with many people from countries which don't or who aren't as liberal to the approach (Ireland, UK, USA) it is quite funny to see how quickly people adjust. After a while it becomes impossible to go out every Friday & Saturday and drink beers, alcopops & spirits at the rate of knots till 7am, I know I've tried it.

    You quickly adjust to a slower pace & a more measured approach, yeah it can still get boisterous but generally its more relaxed and dare I say civilised, theres definetly a lot less puke on the streets or dunken brawls!
    Economic Left/Right: -2.63
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.85

  3. #3
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    95

    Totally agree with you on that. There is such a PC consensus on the situation with alcohol that all the parties seem to be adopting very conservative approaches to the issue that don't seem to fit with what we want

    So for example at a PD meeeting last night people were complaining that the bar closed at bang on 11.30pm with people not able to get a second drink (well it was a long meeting). It was ironic that we along with all other parties support the status quo in principle but in practice we give out about it.

  4. #4
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,353

    worked in a pub in brussels before and think its alot tiddyer. people aren't pooriing out onto the street at the same time.

    if it was introdused here you might have a short rise in drinking, but when the novelty wears of and things even out think it could actualy help alot of public order issues.
    all the latest from the rossport solidaridy camp
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    provided by those nice people in the anarchists. apparently 300 gardai two navy boats and one gardai chopper as of thurs 25th june. so if you want to rob a bank or pirate a ship of say wexford do it this week.

  5. #5
    Politics.ie Regular rockofcashel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    20,778

    FG/SF coalition with Smashey on this one. Have lived in a couple of countries with extended drinking hours, and it definitely decreases the flow of drunken people onto the streets at the same time, as the situation is presently.

    Some of the arguments against it are frankly ridiculous.

    Such as:

    a. we'll be drinking 24 hours a day.

    No we won't. Bar owners are not going to be open 24 hours a day, unless its economically viable. Staying open till 5 in the morning, because 1 lad (or lass), wants to stay drinking, just won't happen.

    On some occasions, say the night Tipp win the All-Ireland, or take last Saturday night, when Munster won the Heineken Cup in Limerick, then maybe yes, pubs might be open very late, but these would be one-offs.

    b. We'll drink more.

    No we won't. People have a finite amount of money to spend on drink. Whether they spend that in 2 hours or 22 hours, they will still spend the same amount, and buy the same amount of drink.

    c. People with alcohol problems will have more access to drink, and this will exacerbate their and their families problems.

    This isn't an issue that should be dealt with under licensing laws, and personally I believe pub owners, who knowingly serve drink to people with alcohol problems should be horsewhipped. A little harsh for some people, but those b'stards know exactly what they are doing, and have no excuse nor sympathy from me.

    Perhaps as an idea, allow pubs to close their doors at a certain time, say 2 am, but then allow them serve inside after that. This would stop people gravitating from one pub to the other to find a late house.

    I know some places might abuse that, but if they do, remove their late licence.
    1,197 people agree with me.. how many agree with you ?

  6. #6
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    95

    Quote Originally Posted by rockofcashel
    FG/SF coalition with Smashey on this one.
    Even more shocking PD/FG/SF coalition!!!

  7. #7
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Workstation 2075
    Posts
    2,771

    alanmcg Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 4:15 pm Post subject:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    rockofcashel wrote:
    FG/SF coalition with Smashey on this one.


    Even more shocking PD/FG/SF coalition!!!
    how about sindo/pd/fg/sf coalition!!!
    Not being able to govern events, I govern myself. -Michel de Montaigne, essayist (1533-1592)

  8. #8
    Politics.ie Regular rockofcashel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    20,778

    right, thats it, I'm against it.. close the pubs at 9
    1,197 people agree with me.. how many agree with you ?

  9. #9
    Politics.ie Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    95

    9am - well not quite 24 hours but 22.5 hours is good enough for me.

  10. #10
    Politics.ie Regular badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    150

    I am definitely in favor of 24 opening, when I was in college in Limerick it was always madness on the streets when every one was pilled into the streets at closing time after gorging on drink trying to get pissed before closing time. Having said that it would be a bit of headache for bar owners when trying to close up. I worked for about 5 years at the weekends in a pub and it was always a struggle to get people to leave after closing time, and that’s when it was the law, I can imagine that will be even harder to move on the last die hards at the end of the night.
    "Luck is probability taken personally" — Chip Denman

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is this the end of Happy Hour? Scot drinking laws.
    By Truth.ie in forum Culture & Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd March 2009, 06:54 PM
  2. Can anyone tell me whats in my drinking water?
    By red365 in forum Environment
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 24th January 2008, 05:21 PM
  3. Anglicisation of our drinking??
    By Rebel CNC in forum Culture & Community
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 27th November 2007, 10:25 PM
  4. Ancient beer drinking
    By discordian in forum History
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12th August 2007, 11:17 PM