Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2101112
Results 111 to 114 of 114

Thread: Campaign against judicial religious oaths

  1. #111
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    850

    Quote Originally Posted by FrankSpeaks View Post
    perprojustice you are missing the point the oaths should preferably be non-religious and at the very least there be non-religious options. This state is supposed to be non-secular and unfortunately its a long way from that.
    I understand your point. My point is that the wording of the oath does not now have religious or secular undertones.
    It bis meerely a vessel on which to ground a charge of perjury.

    Changing the wording of the oath is not a simple task; in fact it would be very involved.

  2. #112
    Politics.ie Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,750

    Quote Originally Posted by perprojustice View Post
    I said it before and I will say it again.
    The oath is only a vehicle on which to ground a charge of perjury.

    Perjury has to be proven beyond doubt and there has to be very strong evidence even before a charge is laid.

    Perjury has to be a wilfull act and had to lend itself to changing the outcome of the case.

    Because of the system not just here in Ireland but throughout Europe and the world the oath is a recognised vehicle( important when it comes to extradition and the likes) on which to base the validity of informations written and informations given orally.

    A judge is not going to decide on the credibility of a witness on what oath he takes.

    The credibility of the witness is based on the accuracy of the information given by that witness to the court.

    A witness can be concluded to be "not a credible witness" for various reasons. This does not mean he has committed perjury.

    Of course there are some judges sitting who make disasterious judgments that are not based on the facts as put before them and this in itself is a disgrace.
    That's not what's at issue: witnesses can either swear an oath or affirm.

    The thread is about the oath that all judges are constitutionally obliged to take before they can take office.

    That oath is a religious oath and is compulsory for anyone wishing to become a judge in Ireland.

  3. #113
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    850

    Quote Originally Posted by marmurr1916 View Post
    That's not what's at issue: witnesses can either swear an oath or affirm.

    The thread is about the oath that all judges are constitutionally obliged to take before they can take office.

    That oath is a religious oath and is compulsory for anyone wishing to become a judge in Ireland.
    Yes I know what you are on about but the posts on this thread digressed many posts back and that response is very relevant to the preceding posts.
    Guess it is time to steer it back on track.

  4. #114
    Politics.ie Regular FrankSpeaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tralee
    Posts
    4,368

    All state oaths should be non-religious or at the very least have non-religious options.

Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2101112

Similar Threads

  1. Irelands Judicial System
    By kittyn in forum Justice
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 28th January 2009, 01:41 PM
  2. Judicial Integrity and Political Influence.
    By MINISTER in forum Justice
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 23rd January 2008, 11:50 AM
  3. Question (Oaths)
    By Universal_001 in forum Justice
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 8th January 2007, 02:11 PM
  4. Judicial Appointments
    By St Disibod in forum Justice
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 13th March 2006, 04:31 PM
  5. Severe Abuse of Judicial Discretion (in India)
    By badinage in forum Justice
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th February 2006, 10:08 AM