Page 113 of 267 FirstFirst ... 1363103111112113114115123163213 ... LastLast
Results 1,121 to 1,130 of 2661

Thread: Irish Mirror Exclusive - Izevbekhai FGM story a lie

  1. #1121
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by corelli View Post
    So it every child in Nigeria at risk, to a greater or lesser degree. Is the answer to let every nigerian with a child who arrives here stay?

    You're reverting back to type.

    Absolutism, not very helpful here.

    As has been pointed out, several EU countries consider FGM as reasonable grounds for claiming asylum. The fact remains those countries have not been inundated with applicants from countries where FGM is practiced including Nigeria.

    The fact of matter is that FGM is considered by many in Nigeria as a cultural dimension to their lives. Many accept it as custom and don’t object, in fact they consider those who are not circumcised to be inferior and unclean. Some people do object but the practice is forced upon them (by extended family members-keeping up with the jones, shame, fear of social exclusion- blah f*ckin blah).

    This woman does not wish this mutilation on her children and used every means at her disposal to ensure her daughters where spared. I accommodate her right to choose and her children’s right to be free of such barbaric practices.

    If anyone, and I mean anyone demanded my daughter have her genitals tampered with so as to make her more acceptable to some misogynist custom I would do anything I could to prevent it, including lying, stealing, cheating, swindling and if the need was warranted killing.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  2. #1122
    Politics.ie Regular bob3344's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,733

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle View Post
    You're reverting back to type.

    Absolutism, not very helpful here.

    As has been pointed out, several EU countries consider FGM as reasonable grounds for claiming asylum. The fact remains those countries have not been inundated with applicants from countries where FGM is practiced including Nigeria.

    The fact of matter is that FGM is considered by many in Nigeria as a cultural dimension to their lives. Many accept it as custom and don’t object, in fact they consider those who are not circumcised to be inferior and unclean. Some people do object but the practice is forced upon them (by extended family members-keeping up with the jones, shame, fear of social exclusion- blah f*ckin blah).

    This woman does not wish this mutilation on her children and used every means at her disposal to ensure her daughters where spared. I accommodate her right to choose and her children’s right to be free of such barbaric practices.

    If anyone, and I mean anyone demanded my daughter have her genitals tampered with so as to make her more acceptable to some misogynist custom I would do anything I could to prevent it, including lying, stealing, cheating, swindling and if the need was warranted killing.
    Fascinating stuff Kev - any chance of answering the question he asked you ?

    So it every child in Nigeria at risk, to a greater or lesser degree. Is the answer to let every nigerian with a child who arrives here stay?

  3. #1123
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ballybay
    Posts
    766

    Quote Originally Posted by Eorna View Post
    A tear jerker question, designed to lead people away from the facts of the case. Pamela has lied at every stage of the process, has defrauded the state, and suckered in many gullible people, and abused their good will in the most awful way possible. The children are not in danger, and should be sent back. Pamela should be deported, once she has served a prison sentence for her actions.
    Excellent post

  4. #1124
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by Eorna View Post
    A tear jerker question,.
    It is the only pertinent question here for people to consider.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eorna View Post
    The children are not in danger
    That has not been established.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  5. #1125
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    My aura is enough
    Posts
    1,458

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew49 View Post
    [COLOR=DarkGreen]Horace Horse wrote[/COLOR] - [COLOR=Red]in a particularly vicious manner[/COLOR]
    Stuff you didn't know about Colm O'Gorman

    Stuff Known About Horace
    Yes we know that John O Gorman did speak out about abuse, he has to be admired he gave men a voice..Horace Horse is a disgrace

  6. #1126
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by bob3344 View Post
    Fascinating stuff Kev - any chance of answering the question he asked you ?
    Its a stupid question.

    Should FGM be grounds to claim asylum? Yes, as it is in many other EU countries.

    Should every child who arrives here from Nigeria be given asylum? No, why should they?

    The lack of ability of some to even consider this objectively is worrying.

    I don't care what uni-dimensional universe you occupy but I quite frankly want nothing to do with it.
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  7. #1127
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    13,615

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle View Post
    You're reverting back to type.

    Absolutism, not very helpful here.

    As has been pointed out, several EU countries consider FGM as reasonable grounds for claiming asylum. The fact remains those countries have not been inundated with applicants from countries where FGM is practiced including Nigeria.

    The fact of matter is that FGM is considered by many in Nigeria as a cultural dimension to their lives. Many accept it as custom and don’t object, in fact they consider those who are not circumcised to be inferior and unclean. Some people do object but the practice is forced upon them (by extended family members-keeping up with the jones, shame, fear of social exclusion- blah f*ckin blah).

    This woman does not wish this mutilation on her children and used every means at her disposal to ensure her daughters where spared. I accommodate her right to choose and her children’s right to be free of such barbaric practices.

    If anyone, and I mean anyone demanded my daughter have her genitals tampered with so as to make her more acceptable to some misogynist custom I would do anything I could to prevent it, including lying, stealing, cheating, swindling and if the need was warranted killing.

    Would you fly directly to a country which would protect you and your daughter, and which had already granted you a visa? Or would you fly to another civilised country and apply for asylum there? Or would you have yourself and daughter smuggled from that country to a third country, carefully avoiding the country which had granted you a visa, and apply for asylum there?

  8. #1128
    Politics.ie Member FutureTaoiseach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dept. of FutureTaoiseach
    Posts
    39,825

    If FGM were the real reason, rather than economic factors, why didn't we have thousads of asylum-seekers in the 1980's? It's economic-migration through illegal immigration.

    Also on the FGM issue and the condemnation of the supposedly widespread practice of FGM in countries like Nigeria, I would like to know how supporters of multiculturalism reconcile this attitude with their belief that all cultures are equal and that the State should be neutral between them? Are you saying that Nigerian culture is worse than Irish culture, and if so, does that make you racist?

  9. #1129
    Politics.ie Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dublin South
    Posts
    11,510

    Quote Originally Posted by Odyessus View Post
    Would you fly directly to a country which would protect you and your daughter, and which had already granted you a visa? Or would you fly to another civilised country and apply for asylum there? Or would you have yourself and daughter smuggled from that country to a third country, carefully avoiding the country which had granted you a visa, and apply for asylum there?
    Whatever it took, as would you if you had children.

    Incidentally, what’s the position of the Father on this?
    Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues.

    George Will

  10. #1130
    Politics.ie Member corelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    17,246

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Doyle View Post
    You're reverting back to type.

    Absolutism, not very helpful here.

    As has been pointed out, several EU countries consider FGM as reasonable grounds for claiming asylum. The fact remains those countries have not been inundated with applicants from countries where FGM is practiced including Nigeria.

    The fact of matter is that FGM is considered by many in Nigeria as a cultural dimension to their lives. Many accept it as custom and don’t object, in fact they consider those who are not circumcised to be inferior and unclean. Some people do object but the practice is forced upon them (by extended family members-keeping up with the jones, shame, fear of social exclusion- blah f*ckin blah).

    This woman does not wish this mutilation on her children and used every means at her disposal to ensure her daughters where spared. I accommodate her right to choose and her children’s right to be free of such barbaric practices.

    If anyone, and I mean anyone demanded my daughter have her genitals tampered with so as to make her more acceptable to some misogynist custom I would do anything I could to prevent it, including lying, stealing, cheating, swindling and if the need was warranted killing.
    It's an acceptable/legitimate ground to claim here too! Absolutely it is. And rightly so. But you HAVE TO PROVE YOU ARE PERSONALLY AT RISK.

    Pamela has not proved her children are personally at risk. Leaving out of it altogether the fake document issue, she has never substantiated her claim to the satisfaction of either the RAC/RAT, Minister or the High Court.

    What more do you want? A decision taken by the local Resident's Against Racism committee?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 6th May 2009, 11:39 AM
  2. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12th September 2006, 08:00 PM
  3. Irish News Collusion Exclusive
    By cain1798 in forum Northern Ireland
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 4th May 2006, 10:13 AM
  4. An "Irish Mirror article from a few years back for all
    By wizzard in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 199
    Last Post: 3rd March 2006, 10:46 PM
  5. Sunday Mirror Story...
    By Vol in forum Current Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 8th August 2005, 05:09 PM