A story which, at first glance, seems to be from the wilder realms of Catalpaland.
It seems a Nigerian heroin dealer had a mooted eight-year sentence cut to seven by the trial judge due to his nationality and race.
Man jailed after €500,000 heroin seizure
"A man who was caught with heroin worth almost €500,000 after he sold drugs to an undercover garda, has been jailed for seven years.
Emmanuel Ashibougwu (26), originally from Nigeria but with an address at Crescent Villas Limerick, was arrested by gardaí last August during an elaborate operation set up to target drug trafficking by foreign nationals in the Limerick region.
...
Judge Moran said the Nigerian father of one was entitled to a sentence reduction because of his guilty plea and because he had no serious previous convictions.
He acknowledged that it was difficult for a foreign man and "in particular a black man" to be incarcerated in an Irish prison and reduced Ashibougwu's sentence by a further year because he was a "black Nigerian man"."
Now, while I can see the logic, if not the merits, in reducing a criminal's sentence if there is evidence adduced in pleadings that s/he is more likely to be mistreated by fellow prisoners (there was no mention of the defence submitting any such evidence), what sort of sentencing precedent does this set?
As well as effectively yielding to inmates' racism instead of attempting to combat it, does this mean that men should get lighter sentences than women because they are more likely to be attacked in prison? Does it mean that sex offenders, paedophiles in particular, should get lighter sentences because they are more likely to be attacked? Could this lead to a greater use of black people, even Irish black people, as drug mules if the barons realise they will be given a lighter sentence?
Totally f,ucking ridiculous. (I can already hear Catalpa and FT rubbing their hands with glee).![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
You were having such a good day.