A friend of mine has arround 32 count of public order which does not constitute a public order and assult and in that area the solicitor are saying that they are busy with work load and the one that was looking after the case withdraw because he's part of the people that fabricated the case in the first place just because they want to force their way because of ''immoral act'' and the case has been going on for one and half year, the court judges are saying that the black man must pleaded guilty before they could conclude the case otherwise the case will go on how would you sums up such a case ?
R v Kewell apply to that case but there is no violent but nothing than fundamental right, and if you look into the case of people (DPP) v Kelly of that nature but no damages or anything of american plane in this case scenarios.
Can people force their way without proper legal process ?
Atleast when birtie ahern corrupt the office he was summon by the tribunal why cant people be honest and go through normal process rather than all this non-sense ''BLACK IS BEUTIFUL''.![]()
Presumption of innocent prevails in the case scenarios aswell and it's left to the court to provide the ''Burden of prove'' and prosecute and if there is no burden of prove by the court and the defendant has that prove the case should be ''struck out'' rather than wasting our tax on rubish case that lack credibility in the face of the law.![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote