Dated report. Suggestions of denial of access to judicial review are premature. The latest piece of legislation on immigration makes no such provision.
Is this attempt to counter threads discussing the latest proposed import of
'children' from Calais by Minishter O'Zappy acting on the proposal passed by the snowflakes in the Dail and all the other migrants being shipped in by our Government to please Mutti ('Mammy') Merkel? Or an attempt to big up Frances' street cred with the gender fluid man/woman in the street who have doubts about unlimited mass migration which continues unabated?
Last edited by Dr Pat; 10th January 2017 at 06:42 PM.
I suppose it depends whether there has been any significant change in the overall number of applications processed.
If there were 10% of 200,000 applications that would be 20,000 allowed in. Whereas five years ago we might have been allowing 15% of 100,000 applications which would give a figure of 15,000 allowed in.
Which would mean a net influx of 5,000. I'm not saying there are 200,000 applications but I use these round figures to demonstrate the robustness of my mathematical porridge.
What about the failed 5000 in DP centres for more than 5 years making failed asylum claim after failed asylum claim? When does that end, and by end I mean deportation? The new legislation being introduced seemed promising at first but reading between the lines it just appears to reduce the legal fees and allows for people to be given Leave to Remain after a couple of failed asylum claims?
Politics.ie is one of Ireland's leading politics and current affairs discussion websites with more than 600,000 visitors a month. Founded in 2003, Politics.ie has one of the most engaged, respected and influential politics and current affairs communities.