Is any poster in a position to outline here the various elements of the speech ?
In a related sense, if the GRA/Gardai really 'believed' that there was criminal corruption at the heart of our 'functioning democracy' then why not investigate that ?
* The Gardai are not ever directed by the MoJ as to the investigations they undertake.
* Neither, contrary to common belief, does the DPP have a function in 'directing' the Gardai.
* The Gardai commence investigations on the basis of complaints made or evidence observed, known, presented to them or believed by them to exist and they are provided via the Dail with the investigative tools with which to undertake such.
If there is another basis on which they operate their powers, then please do tell what that is or may be.
Or maybe there was no belief but the 'corruption element' of the statement was being made for the impact it would make.......i.e. the adoption of a false premise for tactical maneouvring.......and if that's true.....where does that leave us ?
To summarise, if there was a genuine belief that there was criminal corruption then they should have acted in accordance with their powers and if there was no such belief, then this was mischief making of a very, very, tall order.
Now which is it ?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote